Toolbox |
---|
![]() | This peer review discussion is closed. |
This is the first list page I have created. Ideally, I would like to get this article to featured list status, but I am not sure if it meets mustard. I understand that an intro will be needed, but I am waiting to add that until I have fleshed out and sourced the main article so I can transpose sourced material. Outside of the intro, does the list meet the standard and if not can someone advise on what improvements are needed?
Thanks, EnigmaMcmxc ( talk) 22:23, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Minor comment by AustralianRupert: G'day, Enigma, I hope you are well. One thing that stands out to me is the name of the list. "Senior officers" implies to me potentially that the list could be about more than just commanders (for instance CRA and CRE etc), although it could just be me. I wonder if it should be renamed "List of commanders of the British 2nd Division". Thoughts? Regards, AustralianRupert ( talk) 04:11, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
I'll leave some comments in the next few days. Aza24 ( talk) 01:12, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Okay, apologies for the delay:
This article is a chronological list of all officers who held command during its long history. Notes draw attention to important milestones or additional information.– this is something that can be inferred by the average reader, from the title and looking at the list alone.
For further information about the other divisions that were formed and who commanded them, see the main 2nd Division article.is needed either; a reader can reasonably infer this.
Toolbox |
---|
![]() | This peer review discussion is closed. |
This is the first list page I have created. Ideally, I would like to get this article to featured list status, but I am not sure if it meets mustard. I understand that an intro will be needed, but I am waiting to add that until I have fleshed out and sourced the main article so I can transpose sourced material. Outside of the intro, does the list meet the standard and if not can someone advise on what improvements are needed?
Thanks, EnigmaMcmxc ( talk) 22:23, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Minor comment by AustralianRupert: G'day, Enigma, I hope you are well. One thing that stands out to me is the name of the list. "Senior officers" implies to me potentially that the list could be about more than just commanders (for instance CRA and CRE etc), although it could just be me. I wonder if it should be renamed "List of commanders of the British 2nd Division". Thoughts? Regards, AustralianRupert ( talk) 04:11, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
I'll leave some comments in the next few days. Aza24 ( talk) 01:12, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Okay, apologies for the delay:
This article is a chronological list of all officers who held command during its long history. Notes draw attention to important milestones or additional information.– this is something that can be inferred by the average reader, from the title and looking at the list alone.
For further information about the other divisions that were formed and who commanded them, see the main 2nd Division article.is needed either; a reader can reasonably infer this.