looking for some direction on how to improve this article. let me know what you think is missing, needs improvement, or any other ideas you have. thanks!
Randella18:24, 12 November 2006 (UTC)reply
thanks to both for your feedback. haven't had time to review all the automated suggestions, but will review it in detail. also will go ahead and work on integrating the best of the trivia section into the article. although there are 'inline' reference sources, i'll work to make those actual footnotes so the sources are better documented.
Randella02:56, 14 November 2006 (UTC)reply
Indeed, you have the footnotes, but they should be listed in the article itself. You'll need a reference section to list the books, articles and wesbites you used and then a notes section with specific information for each citation. See
WP:CITE. If you have any questions feel free to ask.
*Exeunt* Ganymead |
Dialogue?15:46, 14 November 2006 (UTC)reply
This is a fine start to this article. Here's what you should do to improve it:
looking for some direction on how to improve this article. let me know what you think is missing, needs improvement, or any other ideas you have. thanks!
Randella18:24, 12 November 2006 (UTC)reply
thanks to both for your feedback. haven't had time to review all the automated suggestions, but will review it in detail. also will go ahead and work on integrating the best of the trivia section into the article. although there are 'inline' reference sources, i'll work to make those actual footnotes so the sources are better documented.
Randella02:56, 14 November 2006 (UTC)reply
Indeed, you have the footnotes, but they should be listed in the article itself. You'll need a reference section to list the books, articles and wesbites you used and then a notes section with specific information for each citation. See
WP:CITE. If you have any questions feel free to ask.
*Exeunt* Ganymead |
Dialogue?15:46, 14 November 2006 (UTC)reply
This is a fine start to this article. Here's what you should do to improve it: