From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

76th Infantry Division (United Kingdom)

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review as it has been overhauled from a stub and i am looking to take it through a GA review in the near future. Regards EnigmaMcmxc ( talk) 03:55, 1 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Comments. As always, feel free to revert my copyediting ... sporadic, in this case. These are my edits. - Dank ( push to talk) 02:28, 2 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Thanks very much Dank, much appreciated as always. EnigmaMcmxc ( talk) 15:57, 2 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Comments

  • Use a consistent variety of English - you've got "re-organisation" in the lead but then "reorganization" later in the article
Thats what you get when you get an English guy living in the US using a US-ENG word processor :) fixed! EnigmaMcmxc ( talk) 17:28, 8 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Not my strong suit, examples would need to be highlighted, sorry. EnigmaMcmxc ( talk) 17:28, 8 June 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Your Churchill ref (footnote 5) currently doesn't link properly. Nikkimaria ( talk) 15:28, 8 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Addressed, thank you for time and comments. EnigmaMcmxc ( talk) 17:28, 8 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Comments: G'day, nice work.

  • I made a few tweaks, please check that you are happy with these changes. I have the following other suggestions: AustralianRupert ( talk) 09:02, 15 July 2015 (UTC) reply
  • the first sentence in the Deception section seems a bit abrupt
  • in the References, some of the works have publisher locations, but others don't. For A-class and higher, this should be consistent. Regards, AustralianRupert ( talk) 09:02, 15 July 2015 (UTC) reply
Sorry for the delay in responding, I have not been that active recently. Like the changes. I will make amendments per your suggestions. EnigmaMcmxc ( talk) 22:54, 28 July 2015 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

76th Infantry Division (United Kingdom)

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review as it has been overhauled from a stub and i am looking to take it through a GA review in the near future. Regards EnigmaMcmxc ( talk) 03:55, 1 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Comments. As always, feel free to revert my copyediting ... sporadic, in this case. These are my edits. - Dank ( push to talk) 02:28, 2 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Thanks very much Dank, much appreciated as always. EnigmaMcmxc ( talk) 15:57, 2 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Comments

  • Use a consistent variety of English - you've got "re-organisation" in the lead but then "reorganization" later in the article
Thats what you get when you get an English guy living in the US using a US-ENG word processor :) fixed! EnigmaMcmxc ( talk) 17:28, 8 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Not my strong suit, examples would need to be highlighted, sorry. EnigmaMcmxc ( talk) 17:28, 8 June 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Your Churchill ref (footnote 5) currently doesn't link properly. Nikkimaria ( talk) 15:28, 8 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Addressed, thank you for time and comments. EnigmaMcmxc ( talk) 17:28, 8 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Comments: G'day, nice work.

  • I made a few tweaks, please check that you are happy with these changes. I have the following other suggestions: AustralianRupert ( talk) 09:02, 15 July 2015 (UTC) reply
  • the first sentence in the Deception section seems a bit abrupt
  • in the References, some of the works have publisher locations, but others don't. For A-class and higher, this should be consistent. Regards, AustralianRupert ( talk) 09:02, 15 July 2015 (UTC) reply
Sorry for the delay in responding, I have not been that active recently. Like the changes. I will make amendments per your suggestions. EnigmaMcmxc ( talk) 22:54, 28 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook