- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was Keep Withdrawn. ( NAC) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 13:36, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Wikipedia for World Heritage
Although I support this cause, we really do not need such a page on enwiki, maybe we can have a redirect to the meta or foundation wiki page. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 13:14, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - and publicize. This is not only a great use of Project Space, it's a great project. Absent a meta or foundation page to merge to (which would be preferred) we should keep hosting it. Achowat ( talk) 13:19, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. It is project related. It is reasonable. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 13:24, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - I think that it is important to have the page. By adding the names it will be easy to keep a note on who ever from en wikipedia has signed it. It will help in spreading awarness. I know that a redirect will be equally helpful but still it is better to have the page. The page will be totally focused in getting suggestions and signs from en wikipedia. The page is not going to bother anyone or will disturb anything. It will be little easy for a en editor to collaborate at a wikiproject on en wikipedia then a page on meta or foundation page. Yash t 101 :) 13:29, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - per all, it's project related, keeping it does no harm. B music ian 13:32, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was Keep Withdrawn. ( NAC) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 13:36, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Wikipedia for World Heritage
Although I support this cause, we really do not need such a page on enwiki, maybe we can have a redirect to the meta or foundation wiki page. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 13:14, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - and publicize. This is not only a great use of Project Space, it's a great project. Absent a meta or foundation page to merge to (which would be preferred) we should keep hosting it. Achowat ( talk) 13:19, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. It is project related. It is reasonable. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 13:24, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - I think that it is important to have the page. By adding the names it will be easy to keep a note on who ever from en wikipedia has signed it. It will help in spreading awarness. I know that a redirect will be equally helpful but still it is better to have the page. The page will be totally focused in getting suggestions and signs from en wikipedia. The page is not going to bother anyone or will disturb anything. It will be little easy for a en editor to collaborate at a wikiproject on en wikipedia then a page on meta or foundation page. Yash t 101 :) 13:29, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - per all, it's project related, keeping it does no harm. B music ian 13:32, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.