The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete - Indeed, this has been idle for years, never managed a single entry on the project talk page. I don't see anything much liking here either,
[1], so I don't see any benefit to leaving a redirect in place, searches that would find this would likely find "Countering systemic bias" without difficulty. --
j⚛e deckertalk18:48, 21 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment Typically, WikiProjects that are inactive and have no chance of being revived are marked {{WikiProject status|defunct}}, they are not deleted (see
Category:Defunct WikiProjects). There is no reason to wipe this WikiProject from the historical record.
Also, according to the MfD instructions, "If you are nominating a WikiProject, please post a notice at
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Council, in addition to the project's talk page and the talk pages of the founder and active members." This needs to be done before considering deletion. (
LizRead!Talk!13:22, 25 March 2014 (UTC)reply
thanks Liz. Just notified. I don't think we need to keep all defunct projects, especially ones that never even got off the ground - and especially given the scope of this one is currently managed by an active wikiproject.--
Obi-Wan Kenobi (
talk)
13:51, 25 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias/Gender bias task force as a likely search term or synonym (the distinction between WikiProjects and task forces isn't always especially clear). While most of this is boilerplate, someone could potentially revive this as its own WikiProject, so I don't see the benefit to deletion. No objections to keeping, since it's already appropriately tagged. --
BDD (
talk)
17:41, 1 April 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete - Indeed, this has been idle for years, never managed a single entry on the project talk page. I don't see anything much liking here either,
[1], so I don't see any benefit to leaving a redirect in place, searches that would find this would likely find "Countering systemic bias" without difficulty. --
j⚛e deckertalk18:48, 21 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment Typically, WikiProjects that are inactive and have no chance of being revived are marked {{WikiProject status|defunct}}, they are not deleted (see
Category:Defunct WikiProjects). There is no reason to wipe this WikiProject from the historical record.
Also, according to the MfD instructions, "If you are nominating a WikiProject, please post a notice at
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Council, in addition to the project's talk page and the talk pages of the founder and active members." This needs to be done before considering deletion. (
LizRead!Talk!13:22, 25 March 2014 (UTC)reply
thanks Liz. Just notified. I don't think we need to keep all defunct projects, especially ones that never even got off the ground - and especially given the scope of this one is currently managed by an active wikiproject.--
Obi-Wan Kenobi (
talk)
13:51, 25 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias/Gender bias task force as a likely search term or synonym (the distinction between WikiProjects and task forces isn't always especially clear). While most of this is boilerplate, someone could potentially revive this as its own WikiProject, so I don't see the benefit to deletion. No objections to keeping, since it's already appropriately tagged. --
BDD (
talk)
17:41, 1 April 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.