The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete 7D/2K gives a very comfortable 77% deletion consensus.
Xoloz 15:55, 30 May 2006 (UTC)reply
DRV Notice, This debate has been restarted due to irregularities that has been raised in
deletion review. I have no opinon on this matter. -
Mailer Diablo 17:40, 25 May 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep - It's time for one new pool to begin. The
Eleventy-Billion Pool has gotten very large, so imaginative users should have a cleaner space to make "guesses". As far as I can tell, it is meant to be a non-serious pool, and it has started to develop a bit already. I see no reason why this can't stay.
Timrem 19:05, 25 May 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete Too soon, maybe reopen when we reach 1 billion
Ydam 10:46, 26 May 2006 (UTC)reply
It was cute for a day or two but the joke's over. Time to delete.
Rossami(talk) 05:23, 27 May 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete. Let's not start a trend of filling up our administrative namespace with WPcruft. --
HughCharlesParker (
talk -
contribs) 15:32, 27 May 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep. This is about the zillionth time this has been listed here.
24.127.224.173 17:54, 27 May 2006 (UTC) sock. —Ruud 20:55, 27 May 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete per what I wrote at
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Billion pool; with the only difference is that it is to be re-created when the number of articles reaches 100,000 million and the preferred title is "Wikipedia:Million-million pool".
Georgia guy 00:27, 28 May 2006 (UTC)reply
Very Strong Keep. Every sort of fun on Wikipedia is being thrown out the window. Let us at least keep this. ~LinuxeristE/
L/
T 11:39, 28 May 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete, impossible. --
Terence Ong 15:56, 28 May 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete, totally pointless. -
BigSmooth 05:30, 30 May 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete 7D/2K gives a very comfortable 77% deletion consensus.
Xoloz 15:55, 30 May 2006 (UTC)reply
DRV Notice, This debate has been restarted due to irregularities that has been raised in
deletion review. I have no opinon on this matter. -
Mailer Diablo 17:40, 25 May 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep - It's time for one new pool to begin. The
Eleventy-Billion Pool has gotten very large, so imaginative users should have a cleaner space to make "guesses". As far as I can tell, it is meant to be a non-serious pool, and it has started to develop a bit already. I see no reason why this can't stay.
Timrem 19:05, 25 May 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete Too soon, maybe reopen when we reach 1 billion
Ydam 10:46, 26 May 2006 (UTC)reply
It was cute for a day or two but the joke's over. Time to delete.
Rossami(talk) 05:23, 27 May 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete. Let's not start a trend of filling up our administrative namespace with WPcruft. --
HughCharlesParker (
talk -
contribs) 15:32, 27 May 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep. This is about the zillionth time this has been listed here.
24.127.224.173 17:54, 27 May 2006 (UTC) sock. —Ruud 20:55, 27 May 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete per what I wrote at
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Billion pool; with the only difference is that it is to be re-created when the number of articles reaches 100,000 million and the preferred title is "Wikipedia:Million-million pool".
Georgia guy 00:27, 28 May 2006 (UTC)reply
Very Strong Keep. Every sort of fun on Wikipedia is being thrown out the window. Let us at least keep this. ~LinuxeristE/
L/
T 11:39, 28 May 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete, impossible. --
Terence Ong 15:56, 28 May 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete, totally pointless. -
BigSmooth 05:30, 30 May 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.