The result of the discussion was: delete. I'm closing as Delete as not one person has put forth an argument to keep this page. Liz Read! Talk! 06:58, 24 January 2022 (UTC) Liz Read! Talk! 06:58, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
This was tagged for speedy deletion under WP:G6, which I've rejected as I don't consider deletion routine maintenance—although garbled, it does appear to be a sincere attempt to nominate the page for deletion. However, as it stands the AfD has no chance of success since there's no deletion argument based on Wikipedia policy. Under normal circumstances I'd let the AfD run its course, but this nomination is so garbled and incoherent that leaving it in the record would potentially poison the well in the event of any future, policy-based nomination for deletion (as the AfD would inevitably be procedurally closed as "keep", leading to "well, it was kept last time" arguments). ‑ Iridescent 04:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. I'm closing as Delete as not one person has put forth an argument to keep this page. Liz Read! Talk! 06:58, 24 January 2022 (UTC) Liz Read! Talk! 06:58, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
This was tagged for speedy deletion under WP:G6, which I've rejected as I don't consider deletion routine maintenance—although garbled, it does appear to be a sincere attempt to nominate the page for deletion. However, as it stands the AfD has no chance of success since there's no deletion argument based on Wikipedia policy. Under normal circumstances I'd let the AfD run its course, but this nomination is so garbled and incoherent that leaving it in the record would potentially poison the well in the event of any future, policy-based nomination for deletion (as the AfD would inevitably be procedurally closed as "keep", leading to "well, it was kept last time" arguments). ‑ Iridescent 04:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)