The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment: What's "pertinent" to merge into that article is matter for consensus discussion at the article; I would suggest userspacing this to the account of active volunteer, someone working on that article, if anyone wants it. I have posted a note at
Talk:Whaling in Japan. — SMcCandlishTalk⇒〈°⌊°〉Contribs.20:06, 16 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Comment: any information that is beneficial to an article is worth saving; if no one takes up the offer of userfication at this time then perhaps a compromise would be to blank the content of the draft as it currently stands so as to at least retain an edit history for future perusal. SuperMarioMan02:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Response - There's no benefit to blanking, in this case. We aren't talking about a
WP:BLP-vio or copyright, so if the information could be useful, we can just keep it as-is. I still support a Merge, however.
Achowat (
talk)
15:58, 29 February 2012 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment: What's "pertinent" to merge into that article is matter for consensus discussion at the article; I would suggest userspacing this to the account of active volunteer, someone working on that article, if anyone wants it. I have posted a note at
Talk:Whaling in Japan. — SMcCandlishTalk⇒〈°⌊°〉Contribs.20:06, 16 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Comment: any information that is beneficial to an article is worth saving; if no one takes up the offer of userfication at this time then perhaps a compromise would be to blank the content of the draft as it currently stands so as to at least retain an edit history for future perusal. SuperMarioMan02:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Response - There's no benefit to blanking, in this case. We aren't talking about a
WP:BLP-vio or copyright, so if the information could be useful, we can just keep it as-is. I still support a Merge, however.
Achowat (
talk)
15:58, 29 February 2012 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.