The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep.
Titoxd(
?!? -
help us) 02:36, 14 February 2006 (UTC)reply
It's a guide to gaming the system and POV pushing. As such, destructive to the 'pedia, and inappropriate in userspace.
>Radiant< 15:27, 5 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete There are few constructive tips, but they are strewn among evil.
Xoloz 17:23, 5 February 2006 (UTC)reply
If you think any of the tips are constructive... think again... all of them are quite exquisitly insiduous. :-)
Kim Bruning 14:21, 10 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Neutral - Well, it might be a parody, but it's not funny at all. --
Adolar von Csobánka(Talk) 02:51, 8 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete smacks of WP:POINT to me.
ALKIVAR™ 05:38, 6 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete and optionally block
User:Daniel Quinlan for 45 seconds for trivial policy violations.
Stifle 16:55, 7 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete um...maybe it's satire...hopefully.--
MONGO 04:30, 8 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Just delete the fucking thing - why the hell are people still arguing over this? Any admin can speedy this garbage for what it is.
Rob Church (
talk) 13:40, 10 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep, duh. "published exploits, patch to follow". ;-) Need this kind of documentation to figure out what's working and what's not. If can't keep, copy to my userspace. (Wait! It's already IN userspace... make that a speedy keep then)
Kim Bruning 14:18, 10 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep, it got a laugh out of me. It's obvious, if one looks at
Daniel Quinlan's history, that this is a parody / "ha ha only serious" critique of a behaviour we put up with much too much. And userspace IS where one makes a point, if one wishes. —
Matthew Brown (
T:
C) 14:25, 10 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Keepbecause this is a page against userboxen and all pages against userboxen are undeleteable Harmless parody in userspace, doesn't single out any undeserving group of editors, isn't divisive, is reasonably witty.
Physchim62(talk) 14:26, 10 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Strong Keep get out of user space.
Grue 14:27, 10 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep: Good grief. You guys arguing for deletion need to get your humor chips checked for error :) --
Durin 14:34, 10 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep, maybe even give a spot on meta if they'll let us. It's funny, dudes ...
fuddlemark (
fuddle me!) 14:58, 10 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep, no one should delete this fine example of wikipedia meta-humor, to do so would be a crime, a crime against the wiki.
Babajobu 15:02, 10 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Weak Keep While the content might not be "honourable", interference in the user pages is a "worse" crime. --
Evanx(
tag?) 09:21, 12 February 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep.
Titoxd(
?!? -
help us) 02:36, 14 February 2006 (UTC)reply
It's a guide to gaming the system and POV pushing. As such, destructive to the 'pedia, and inappropriate in userspace.
>Radiant< 15:27, 5 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete There are few constructive tips, but they are strewn among evil.
Xoloz 17:23, 5 February 2006 (UTC)reply
If you think any of the tips are constructive... think again... all of them are quite exquisitly insiduous. :-)
Kim Bruning 14:21, 10 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Neutral - Well, it might be a parody, but it's not funny at all. --
Adolar von Csobánka(Talk) 02:51, 8 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete smacks of WP:POINT to me.
ALKIVAR™ 05:38, 6 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete and optionally block
User:Daniel Quinlan for 45 seconds for trivial policy violations.
Stifle 16:55, 7 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete um...maybe it's satire...hopefully.--
MONGO 04:30, 8 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Just delete the fucking thing - why the hell are people still arguing over this? Any admin can speedy this garbage for what it is.
Rob Church (
talk) 13:40, 10 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep, duh. "published exploits, patch to follow". ;-) Need this kind of documentation to figure out what's working and what's not. If can't keep, copy to my userspace. (Wait! It's already IN userspace... make that a speedy keep then)
Kim Bruning 14:18, 10 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep, it got a laugh out of me. It's obvious, if one looks at
Daniel Quinlan's history, that this is a parody / "ha ha only serious" critique of a behaviour we put up with much too much. And userspace IS where one makes a point, if one wishes. —
Matthew Brown (
T:
C) 14:25, 10 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Keepbecause this is a page against userboxen and all pages against userboxen are undeleteable Harmless parody in userspace, doesn't single out any undeserving group of editors, isn't divisive, is reasonably witty.
Physchim62(talk) 14:26, 10 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Strong Keep get out of user space.
Grue 14:27, 10 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep: Good grief. You guys arguing for deletion need to get your humor chips checked for error :) --
Durin 14:34, 10 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep, maybe even give a spot on meta if they'll let us. It's funny, dudes ...
fuddlemark (
fuddle me!) 14:58, 10 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep, no one should delete this fine example of wikipedia meta-humor, to do so would be a crime, a crime against the wiki.
Babajobu 15:02, 10 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Weak Keep While the content might not be "honourable", interference in the user pages is a "worse" crime. --
Evanx(
tag?) 09:21, 12 February 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.