The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was
delete.
Acalamari 20:25, 5 June 2008 (UTC)reply
Portal with very narrow scope; hasn't been updated in over a year.
CrazyLegsKC 18:04, 30 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete abandoned portal that was never updated. Notice that it has not been updated at all since it was created on 8 January 2007 except for 3 edits: silly vandalism, removal of that vandalism, and removal of a image placeholder. Doesn't appear to be any content or history worth preserving for historical purposes. --
Enric Naval (
talk) 05:58, 1 June 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete - non-active portal, there's no need to keep it.
macytalk 18:41, 1 June 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete Hardly 100 articles within scope.
Ultra! 09:26, 5 June 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was
delete.
Acalamari 20:25, 5 June 2008 (UTC)reply
Portal with very narrow scope; hasn't been updated in over a year.
CrazyLegsKC 18:04, 30 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete abandoned portal that was never updated. Notice that it has not been updated at all since it was created on 8 January 2007 except for 3 edits: silly vandalism, removal of that vandalism, and removal of a image placeholder. Doesn't appear to be any content or history worth preserving for historical purposes. --
Enric Naval (
talk) 05:58, 1 June 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete - non-active portal, there's no need to keep it.
macytalk 18:41, 1 June 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete Hardly 100 articles within scope.
Ultra! 09:26, 5 June 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.