- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Acalamari 02:02, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
Portal:Nine Inch Nails
just blue blocks; and why does each and every band get its own portal these days? They don't have that much coverage. Ultra! 19:39, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete as it is. It was created several months ago so in all probability it isn't going to be filled. However if it is, it would be worth keeping. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 01:49, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Its still in the under construction category, which is why there are "just blue blocks" (thats how portals start off). While I don't see a reason to give all bands portals, this one is different. Trent Reznor has band members on live shows and has numerous albums as well as a lively history. Not to mention he's still active. In my opinion, if any "band" would get one, it would be Nine Inch Nails. I'm considering its deletion only because no one has worked on it, and recreation would be very easy in the event someone decides to keep it active. — Maggot Syn 01:57, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - nothing here, and no meaningful edits in over a year -- T- rex 20:50, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
- 'Delete per the fact its inactive. DA PIE EATER ( talk) 14:31, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Whats the point in keeping this? It has not content whatsoever, so its not a help in anyway, and it hasn't had any real content edits ever(it has existed since 07), so its not going to expand.-- SJP ( talk) 22:14, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Acalamari 02:02, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
Portal:Nine Inch Nails
just blue blocks; and why does each and every band get its own portal these days? They don't have that much coverage. Ultra! 19:39, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete as it is. It was created several months ago so in all probability it isn't going to be filled. However if it is, it would be worth keeping. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 01:49, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Its still in the under construction category, which is why there are "just blue blocks" (thats how portals start off). While I don't see a reason to give all bands portals, this one is different. Trent Reznor has band members on live shows and has numerous albums as well as a lively history. Not to mention he's still active. In my opinion, if any "band" would get one, it would be Nine Inch Nails. I'm considering its deletion only because no one has worked on it, and recreation would be very easy in the event someone decides to keep it active. — Maggot Syn 01:57, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - nothing here, and no meaningful edits in over a year -- T- rex 20:50, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
- 'Delete per the fact its inactive. DA PIE EATER ( talk) 14:31, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Whats the point in keeping this? It has not content whatsoever, so its not a help in anyway, and it hasn't had any real content edits ever(it has existed since 07), so its not going to expand.-- SJP ( talk) 22:14, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.