- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. Xoloz 07:50, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Portal:Avril Lavigne
As per recomendation for WP:AVRWPRO Nathannoblet 23:25, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as the portal has far too narrow a focus to ever be really useful or have many articles shown on it. And thanks to Nathannoblet for catching my goof for me and actually putting his own work up for discussion like this. That demonstrates real character, and I salute him for it. Unless he indicates otherwise, I think we should consider his own opinion on this Neutral, as he was only completing my nomination below. Badbilltucker 00:00, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete -- too narrow a focus. Nominated by the creator also. - Longhair\ talk 01:12, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Too narrow of a focus for a real portal. -- Nishkid64 00:53, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - Jo e I 23:27, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete -- ArmadilloFromHell 07:17, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. Xoloz 07:50, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Portal:Avril Lavigne
As per recomendation for WP:AVRWPRO Nathannoblet 23:25, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as the portal has far too narrow a focus to ever be really useful or have many articles shown on it. And thanks to Nathannoblet for catching my goof for me and actually putting his own work up for discussion like this. That demonstrates real character, and I salute him for it. Unless he indicates otherwise, I think we should consider his own opinion on this Neutral, as he was only completing my nomination below. Badbilltucker 00:00, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete -- too narrow a focus. Nominated by the creator also. - Longhair\ talk 01:12, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Too narrow of a focus for a real portal. -- Nishkid64 00:53, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - Jo e I 23:27, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete -- ArmadilloFromHell 07:17, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.