- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 03:28, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Module:PropertyLink
Unused and redundant to e.g. {{ Wikidata}}. Was called by Template:PropertyLink but that was was deleted a while ago. Was used in two articles Adns and GNU Anubis until I replaced it with simpler uses of {{ Wikidata}}. As that and its module are being maintained and supported far better for editors to use it than this. JohnBlackburne words deeds 00:32, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as unused and redundant, per nom. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 09:16, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support. I don't understand Module space, but the nomination seems sensible and I trust JohnBlackburne. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 06:01, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support Template:Wikidata can be used in more cases than PropertyLink. PropertyLink does make it easier to get image links from wikidata, but doing the same in template:wikidata only requires writing a pipe sign and "p18".-- Snaevar ( talk) 17:19, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
- I don't maintain this Module on enwiki, but on hewiki ( he:Module:PropertyLink). As long as it is not being used in enwiki, I don't think there is a good reason to keep it. PropertyLink is intended to be high level interface for wikidata, to help with common usecases (e.g [[sitelink|label]] which is important for disambig cases) and easy way to import images from Wikidata. The hewiki PropertyLink has some more additional useful common cases. Eran ( talk) 18:42, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 03:28, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Module:PropertyLink
Unused and redundant to e.g. {{ Wikidata}}. Was called by Template:PropertyLink but that was was deleted a while ago. Was used in two articles Adns and GNU Anubis until I replaced it with simpler uses of {{ Wikidata}}. As that and its module are being maintained and supported far better for editors to use it than this. JohnBlackburne words deeds 00:32, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as unused and redundant, per nom. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 09:16, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support. I don't understand Module space, but the nomination seems sensible and I trust JohnBlackburne. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 06:01, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support Template:Wikidata can be used in more cases than PropertyLink. PropertyLink does make it easier to get image links from wikidata, but doing the same in template:wikidata only requires writing a pipe sign and "p18".-- Snaevar ( talk) 17:19, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
- I don't maintain this Module on enwiki, but on hewiki ( he:Module:PropertyLink). As long as it is not being used in enwiki, I don't think there is a good reason to keep it. PropertyLink is intended to be high level interface for wikidata, to help with common usecases (e.g [[sitelink|label]] which is important for disambig cases) and easy way to import images from Wikidata. The hewiki PropertyLink has some more additional useful common cases. Eran ( talk) 18:42, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.