From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ♠ PMC(talk) 23:46, 30 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Draft:James Britton (badminton)

Draft:James Britton (badminton) ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The statement that he won medals in the 1996 Olympic Games is untrue. The vandalism to Badminton at the 1996 Summer Olympics has been reverted. Since the subject is a real person, this draft is a BLP violation. Robert McClenon ( talk) 03:29, 22 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Robert McClenon, the statement has been removed, so it is not a BLP violation. Does the draft still require deletion? Primefac ( talk) 17:24, 22 May 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ♠ PMC(talk) 23:46, 30 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Draft:James Britton (badminton)

Draft:James Britton (badminton) ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The statement that he won medals in the 1996 Olympic Games is untrue. The vandalism to Badminton at the 1996 Summer Olympics has been reverted. Since the subject is a real person, this draft is a BLP violation. Robert McClenon ( talk) 03:29, 22 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Robert McClenon, the statement has been removed, so it is not a BLP violation. Does the draft still require deletion? Primefac ( talk) 17:24, 22 May 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.



Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook