- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: Speedied per WP:SNOW. Added thought: Although the CSD are appropriately construed narrowly in draftspace, we should consider adding a deletion criterion broad enough to encompass screeds that do not even pretend to be aimed at creating an encyclopedia article. Newyorkbrad ( talk) 23:35, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Draft:Guide on how to pull bitches
Was up for CSD by Jan Myšák, and I understand why, rightly declined by Liz for perfectly good procedural reasons, this is misogynist heap of ordure, WP:OR, likely copyvio from some sexist lad fantasy publication, and will never be acceptable as an article here. Much more like trolling than the work of any serious editor. Childish WP:ESSAY 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 10:03, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- Strong Delete as a worthless misogynist trash. — Sundostund mppria ( talk / contribs) 11:11, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- Strong Delete this serves no purpose on an encyclopedia. It reminds me of something I think Hugh Hefner said when asked why he had so many “bitches”: “because I don’t call them bitches”. Dronebogus ( talk) 19:53, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- Strong Delete. Not appropriate for WP. -- Bduke ( talk) 22:01, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Troll page made today. Not G1. I’d have tagged it G5 and G10. — SmokeyJoe ( talk) 22:10, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: Speedied per WP:SNOW. Added thought: Although the CSD are appropriately construed narrowly in draftspace, we should consider adding a deletion criterion broad enough to encompass screeds that do not even pretend to be aimed at creating an encyclopedia article. Newyorkbrad ( talk) 23:35, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Draft:Guide on how to pull bitches
Was up for CSD by Jan Myšák, and I understand why, rightly declined by Liz for perfectly good procedural reasons, this is misogynist heap of ordure, WP:OR, likely copyvio from some sexist lad fantasy publication, and will never be acceptable as an article here. Much more like trolling than the work of any serious editor. Childish WP:ESSAY 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 10:03, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- Strong Delete as a worthless misogynist trash. — Sundostund mppria ( talk / contribs) 11:11, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- Strong Delete this serves no purpose on an encyclopedia. It reminds me of something I think Hugh Hefner said when asked why he had so many “bitches”: “because I don’t call them bitches”. Dronebogus ( talk) 19:53, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- Strong Delete. Not appropriate for WP. -- Bduke ( talk) 22:01, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Troll page made today. Not G1. I’d have tagged it G5 and G10. — SmokeyJoe ( talk) 22:10, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.