- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: keep . Returning to mainspace. Sources are decent, and it's not any worse than a number of other mainspace pages. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 02:46, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Draft:Frister & Rossmann
The draft has been dormant for over 5 months and the creator has been blocked. MT Train Discuss 17:00, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Just needs research work.... Frister & Rossman (1905), Manual Sewing Machine - Frister and Rossmann, circa 1905, Museum Victoria, retrieved 15 January 2018 --- I will try to come up with more. Regards, Ariconte ( talk) 18:48, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep even (at least) two of the AfC reviewers think it's notable. It should be purged of problematic content and moved to mainspace (with references like the one pointed out by Ariconte added). – Finnusertop ( talk ⋅ contribs) 19:15, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Please don't nominate articles here that are deemed notable by AFC reviewers. Egaoblai ( talk) 21:49, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep A notable and historic manufacturing company, and Wikipedia should have an article about it. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 22:32, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Move back to mainspace. Sources added, that's all that was required. "Likely notable to accept but we need all available major independent news added to enhance the page" was a pretty poor reason to deny its return to mainspace. Notable topics only get improved by experienced editors in mainspace. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 01:02, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- I'd say this has the basis for something we can keep, isn't there an article rescue squadron around here somewhere? – Athaenara ✉ 09:54, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- (Nominating this page here was a good move, I think. Who knows how much longer it would have mouldered away in the shadows without an open discussion of its predicament?) – Athaenara ✉ 09:58, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: keep . Returning to mainspace. Sources are decent, and it's not any worse than a number of other mainspace pages. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 02:46, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Draft:Frister & Rossmann
The draft has been dormant for over 5 months and the creator has been blocked. MT Train Discuss 17:00, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Just needs research work.... Frister & Rossman (1905), Manual Sewing Machine - Frister and Rossmann, circa 1905, Museum Victoria, retrieved 15 January 2018 --- I will try to come up with more. Regards, Ariconte ( talk) 18:48, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep even (at least) two of the AfC reviewers think it's notable. It should be purged of problematic content and moved to mainspace (with references like the one pointed out by Ariconte added). – Finnusertop ( talk ⋅ contribs) 19:15, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Please don't nominate articles here that are deemed notable by AFC reviewers. Egaoblai ( talk) 21:49, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep A notable and historic manufacturing company, and Wikipedia should have an article about it. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 22:32, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Move back to mainspace. Sources added, that's all that was required. "Likely notable to accept but we need all available major independent news added to enhance the page" was a pretty poor reason to deny its return to mainspace. Notable topics only get improved by experienced editors in mainspace. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 01:02, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- I'd say this has the basis for something we can keep, isn't there an article rescue squadron around here somewhere? – Athaenara ✉ 09:54, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- (Nominating this page here was a good move, I think. Who knows how much longer it would have mouldered away in the shadows without an open discussion of its predicament?) – Athaenara ✉ 09:58, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.