- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was No consensus (Non-administrator closure). ~~ Ebe123~~ → report ← Contribs 12:01, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
Book:Editor war
The entire topic here is contained within the editor war article, which by necessity includes enough details on the other two subjects to form a complete picture. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 11:25, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
- I wondered about the usefulness of that book, too, when I moved it. -- The Evil IP address ( talk) 17:11, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Books are collections of articles related to a topic. This is exactly that. The editor war is certainly a notable topic, and having a book on it is not problematic in any way. Headbomb { talk / contribs / physics / books} 00:34, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
- Weak delete I fail to see the usefulness of a book that cannot contain more than these three articles. Books are supposed to contain significantly more information than the eponymous article. — Ruud 10:40, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was No consensus (Non-administrator closure). ~~ Ebe123~~ → report ← Contribs 12:01, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
Book:Editor war
The entire topic here is contained within the editor war article, which by necessity includes enough details on the other two subjects to form a complete picture. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 11:25, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
- I wondered about the usefulness of that book, too, when I moved it. -- The Evil IP address ( talk) 17:11, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Books are collections of articles related to a topic. This is exactly that. The editor war is certainly a notable topic, and having a book on it is not problematic in any way. Headbomb { talk / contribs / physics / books} 00:34, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
- Weak delete I fail to see the usefulness of a book that cannot contain more than these three articles. Books are supposed to contain significantly more information than the eponymous article. — Ruud 10:40, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.