| Wikipedia Mediation Cabal | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Article | Kabul Province |
| Status | Closed |
| Request date | 22:29, 1 December 2009 (UTC) |
| Requesting party | Unknown |
Request details
Where is the dispute?
- Kabul Province is the article and the issue is being discussed at Talk:Kabul_Province#NPS_tribal_map
Who is involved?
What is the dispute?
- Use of a week source.
What would you like to change about this?
I don't see any reason why that particular source should be used in that particular case. I have given few reasons in the discussion page on why the sources should not be used.
How do you think we can help?
I would request some neutral members to go over the source (which is a tribal map) and the discussion so we can settle the issue.
Mediator notes
Administrative notes
Cabalistas, please note that a WP:3O request was more or less simultaneously made (diff) with this request and I provided a Third Opinion which appears to have had some results. Had I known this request was pending, I would have declined to opine pursuant to the WP:3O FAQ. Do with it as you will, but my recommendation would be not to open this mediation until it is seen whether the dispute continues. — TRANSPORTERMAN ( TALK) 22:31, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- Holding off Awaiting 3O results.
Netalarm
talk 05:43, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- Did 3O solve it to satisfaction?
Xavexgoem (
talk) 19:03, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
- The 3O opinion (or maybe the page protection) seems to have ended the dispute, so I'm changing this to Closed. TRANSPORTERMAN ( TALK) 16:43, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
- Did 3O solve it to satisfaction?
Xavexgoem (
talk) 19:03, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
Discussion
| Wikipedia Mediation Cabal | |
|---|---|
|
| |
| Article | Kabul Province |
| Status | Closed |
| Request date | 22:29, 1 December 2009 (UTC) |
| Requesting party | Unknown |
Request details
Where is the dispute?
- Kabul Province is the article and the issue is being discussed at Talk:Kabul_Province#NPS_tribal_map
Who is involved?
What is the dispute?
- Use of a week source.
What would you like to change about this?
I don't see any reason why that particular source should be used in that particular case. I have given few reasons in the discussion page on why the sources should not be used.
How do you think we can help?
I would request some neutral members to go over the source (which is a tribal map) and the discussion so we can settle the issue.
Mediator notes
Administrative notes
Cabalistas, please note that a WP:3O request was more or less simultaneously made (diff) with this request and I provided a Third Opinion which appears to have had some results. Had I known this request was pending, I would have declined to opine pursuant to the WP:3O FAQ. Do with it as you will, but my recommendation would be not to open this mediation until it is seen whether the dispute continues. — TRANSPORTERMAN ( TALK) 22:31, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- Holding off Awaiting 3O results.
Netalarm
talk 05:43, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- Did 3O solve it to satisfaction?
Xavexgoem (
talk) 19:03, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
- The 3O opinion (or maybe the page protection) seems to have ended the dispute, so I'm changing this to Closed. TRANSPORTERMAN ( TALK) 16:43, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
- Did 3O solve it to satisfaction?
Xavexgoem (
talk) 19:03, 17 December 2009 (UTC)