Wikipedia Mediation Cabal | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Article | Carabinieri |
Status | closed |
Request date | 13:44, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
Requesting party | Unknown |
Parties involved |
User:Bibiki User:Noclador |
Mediator(s) | QUANTUM ZENO |
Comment | Stale; both mediator and main party haven't edited since August. |
The dispute is on parts of article Carabinieri and is actively being discussed by the two editors in disagreement on Talk:Carabinieri
The dispute is two pronged and is discussed in two separate sections of the Talk:Carabinieri page:
User:Bibiki would like to have his latest edits, currently reverted by User:Noclador, reinstated in their original form or with alternative phrasing as long as the main points made on Talk:Carabinieri are made in the article.
User:Bibiki would like you to take a look at his latest edits that were reverted by User:Noclador and provide your opinion on whether they should have indeed been reverted based on the evidence provided on the relevant talk page sections here: Talk:Carabinieri. In case you do agree that the issues User:Bibiki brings up do deserve a mention but you believe that they should be phrased differently, please propose alternative phrasing.
Mediation will take place on article's talk page for now. I have presented a summary there. -- QUANTUM ZENO 23:44, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
(Note from a third party)
I don’t know how this works, as I’ve not seen this before, but you should probably know this was filed as a 3O case also, and there is a response from the other party
there.
Wikipedia Mediation Cabal | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Article | Carabinieri |
Status | closed |
Request date | 13:44, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
Requesting party | Unknown |
Parties involved |
User:Bibiki User:Noclador |
Mediator(s) | QUANTUM ZENO |
Comment | Stale; both mediator and main party haven't edited since August. |
The dispute is on parts of article Carabinieri and is actively being discussed by the two editors in disagreement on Talk:Carabinieri
The dispute is two pronged and is discussed in two separate sections of the Talk:Carabinieri page:
User:Bibiki would like to have his latest edits, currently reverted by User:Noclador, reinstated in their original form or with alternative phrasing as long as the main points made on Talk:Carabinieri are made in the article.
User:Bibiki would like you to take a look at his latest edits that were reverted by User:Noclador and provide your opinion on whether they should have indeed been reverted based on the evidence provided on the relevant talk page sections here: Talk:Carabinieri. In case you do agree that the issues User:Bibiki brings up do deserve a mention but you believe that they should be phrased differently, please propose alternative phrasing.
Mediation will take place on article's talk page for now. I have presented a summary there. -- QUANTUM ZENO 23:44, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
(Note from a third party)
I don’t know how this works, as I’ve not seen this before, but you should probably know this was filed as a 3O case also, and there is a response from the other party
there.