The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

keep. Arguments that the free alternative can't function as a fully valid in-character photograph seem valid in this case. 
Fut.Perf. 
☼ 
13:21, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
reply

Image:Bakert.jpg

Image:Bakert.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by PMelvilleAustin ( notify | contribs).

• copyrigted image superceded by the free image Image:Tombakersunderland.jpg (AU) Fasach Nua ( talk) 12:05, 27 July 2008 (UTC) reply
• Keep Alternative image is not in character; not a suitable replacement. — Edokter • Talk • 23:10, 27 July 2008 (UTC) reply
• Keep ditto reason of Edokter Kuralyov ( talk) 00:53, 28 July 2008 (UTC) reply
• Wait — I'd like to see some discussion on pages like Talk:Fourth Doctor about whether the free image of Baker in costume is or is not a suitable replacement for this one, before it's deleted altogether. Is a photo of an actor at a public event dressed as a character he plays, the same as a photo of the character? Does a costume make the character, or does the environment matter? These aren't clear-cut questions, and I'd like to see some debate of them before rushing into a decision. If there's a consensus that this is a suitable free replacement, the nonfree image can be nominated for deletion again later. — Josiah Rowe ( talk • contribs) 08:05, 28 July 2008 (UTC) reply

These are clear-cut questions. Is the picture of him a) from the show itself, or b) an official publicity photo intended to represent the character? It isn't, and therefore is not in-character. Kuralyov ( talk) 19:16, 28 July 2008 (UTC) reply

The reason given to justify the copyrighted image's use on WP is "As a visual representation of the Doctor", the question is, can this be done with the free image Image:Tombakersunderland.jpg ? I would say it can Fasach Nua ( talk) 22:34, 28 July 2008 (UTC) reply

But not "adequately", as mentioned by NFCC. The image simply does not represent the Fourth Doctor. — Edokter • Talk • 23:17, 28 July 2008 (UTC) reply

What are the deficiencies, that cannot be conveyed using GFDL text? Fasach Nua ( talk) 08:06, 29 July 2008 (UTC) reply

Just try to adequately describe the Fourth Doctor's appearence in words to the ignorant... you can't. As for what lacks in the free image; there are several trates that make up the character besides appearence. Posture, attitude and environment for instance. I have never seen the Fourth Doctor so happy and smiling cruising around some public event in the series. The image simply does not represent what the 4th Doctor stands for. — Edokter • Talk • 15:04, 29 July 2008 (UTC) reply

Are you suggesting that Tom Baker does a poor impression of the fourth Doctor? Fasach Nua ( talk) 07:54, 30 July 2008 (UTC) reply

In this instance, yes. — Edokter • Talk • 14:37, 31 July 2008 (UTC) reply

• Keep per Edokter. → Wordbuilder ( talk) 14:17, 29 July 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

Deleted.  Orphaned, with none objecting. 
Wily
D 
15:19, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
reply

Image:Justin Clark.jpg

Image:Justin Clark.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Stitch45457 ( notify | contribs).

• Unused, probably unencyclopedic. Used in the deleted article Justin David Clark (speedily deleted under CSD A7). — Bkell ( talk) 04:29, 27 July 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

Deleted.  Orphaned, none objecting. 
Wily
D 
15:20, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
reply

Image:JasonTimothyThomasMain.jpg

Image:JasonTimothyThomasMain.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jdub983 ( notify | contribs).

• Unused, unencyclopedic. Used in the deleted article Jason timothy thomas (speedily deleted under CSD A7). — Bkell ( talk) 05:24, 27 July 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

Deleted.  Bad licence. 
Wily
D 
15:22, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
reply

Image:IsabelleLynn.jpg

Image:IsabelleLynn.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mikeyeulett ( notify | contribs).

• uploader has uploaded tons of obviously not-self-taken photos like this Calliopejen1 ( talk) 07:57, 27 July 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

Deleted.  Unused, problematic licence. 
Wily
D 
15:24, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
reply

Image:Daniella.jpg

Image:Daniella.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mikeyeulett ( notify | contribs).

• uploader has uploaded tons of obviously not-self-taken photos like this Calliopejen1 ( talk) 07:57, 27 July 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

consensus to keep (nomination withdrawn) 
Fut.Perf. 
☼ 
21:19, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
reply

Image:Seventh_sharp_nine_chord_on_C.mid

Image:Seventh_sharp_nine_chord_on_C.mid ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hyacinth ( notify | contribs).

• Very small file (132 B), I tried playing it, but I could not; I think it is 'missing file'. Could someone try it? O sama K 09:11, 27 July 2008 (UTC) reply
• Keep. Small file size is the advantage of midi. The problem may be your browser. Wikipedia:Media help (MIDI) is currently highly uninformative. See Wikipedia talk:Media help (MIDI). Hyacinth ( talk) 09:14, 27 July 2008 (UTC) reply
• Keep. Plays for me (2 sec. with Firefox 3.0, Totem plugin, Linux). Check your mixer settings too. -- Jtir ( talk) 20:19, 27 July 2008 (UTC) reply
• Then, Keep.-- O sama K 20:54, 27 July 2008 (UTC) reply
• Keep per all of above. — BQZip01 —  ^talk 03:34, 29 July 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

- Kept - no longer orphaned and license appears ok - 
Peripitus 
(Talk) 
04:48, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
reply

Image:Redeye_2006.jpg

Image:Redeye_2006.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Redeye27 ( notify | contribs).

• Orphaned Unencyclopedic personal image O sama K 10:59, 27 July 2008 (UTC) reply
• Oppose - Now it's used in an article. See also ( Google image search). Joshua Issac ( talk) 21:00, 4 August 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

- Keep - consensus is that it's encyclopedic and the image is no longer orphaned - 
Peripitus 
(Talk) 
05:47, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
reply

Image:Reg_Smyth_from_a_family_photograph_owned_by_the_Smyth_family_2007..jpg

Image:Reg_Smyth_from_a_family_photograph_owned_by_the_Smyth_family_2007..jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Holmcroft ( notify | contribs).

• Orphaned Unencyclopedic personal image O sama K 11:29, 27 July 2008 (UTC) reply

• It's currently orphaned, but is not unencyclopedic: it's the cartoonist Reg Smythe and is presumably destined for that article. A bit of clarification about the copyright would be useful though; it seems to be all over the place without attribution. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] Gordonofcartoon ( talk) 12:09, 27 July 2008 (UTC) reply

Then, I suggest keeping.-- O sama K 12:26, 27 July 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

keep. Identity confirmed via OTRS. 
howcheng  {
chat} 
17:54, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
reply

Image:Harisc_4.jpg

Image:Harisc_4.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lionette ( notify | contribs).

• pro photo, no OTRS permission, all others by uploader have been deleted for this reason Calliopejen1 ( talk) 19:48, 27 July 2008 (UTC) reply
• Oppose - I've sent a request for OTRS. See also ( some diff). -- Joshua Issac ( talk) 20:45, 4 August 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

- Keep - 
Peripitus 
(Talk) 
05:54, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
reply

Image:Dublin Dr Pepper IMG 0959.JPG

Image:Dublin Dr Pepper IMG 0959.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Billy Hathorn ( notify | contribs).

• Derivative of copyrighted work with no fair-use claim. → Wordbuilder ( talk) 20:36, 27 July 2008 (UTC) reply

I took the picture from a product I purchased. There is nothing on the packaging about it being copyrighted. Billy Hathorn ( talk) 23:12, 27 July 2008 (UTC) reply

• It doesn't have to specifically state that it is copyrighted. Further, the logos for Dr. Pepper and Imperial Suger carry the registered trademark logo. → Wordbuilder ( talk) 13:44, 28 July 2008 (UTC) reply
• DeleteKeep unless a fair use rationale is added, image is added to an article, and appropriately tagged as containing trademarks, it should be deleted. I concur that this image was appropriately made, but Wikipedia's image policy is more restrictive than general fair use criteria. This image could be useful as Dr Pepper only makes a limited quantity of Dr. Pepper from its original recipe from pure cane sugar. Please hold off for 24 hours before deletion as I intend to assist in keeping this image. — BQZip01 —  ^talk 23:17, 2 August 2008 (UTC) reply

  Image now contains all appropriate information & is properly used in Wikipedia. — BQZip01 —  ^talk 23:40, 2 August 2008 (UTC) reply

  Looks good. I have no objection to the image being kept. → Wordbuilder ( talk) 00:38, 3 August 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

- Keep - 
Peripitus 
(Talk) 
05:58, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
reply

Image:Omhcent.jpg

Image:Omhcent.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cbailward ( notify | contribs).

• Unused, probably unencyclopedic. — Bkell ( talk) 21:45, 27 July 2008 (UTC) reply
  • Never mind; it turns out it's used in The Old Malthouse (or it is now—previously the scaled-down Image:Omhcent3.jpg was being used). Withdraw this listing. — Bkell ( talk) 21:49, 27 July 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.