![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I was just curious and I saw this diff. [1]. This could eb a bug in updating the list on meta although I added my name without it removing others. ·Add§hore· Talk/ Cont 16:26, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
I just tried to start huggle —as I did many many times before—, but this time I got a warning
Does anyone know how to solve this problem? Thanks in advance. :) — αἰτίας • discussion• 19:43, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Hey, I'm running Vista Business. Every time I close Huggle, I get the following error:
(snipped error message)
Phew....So, any ideas? (Sorry for the length, but it's an exact quote.) Thanks in advance. —Signed by KoЯnfan71 My Talk Sign Here! 00:43, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Ok thanks. One other thing. I have it set so that nothing is a minor change, but all reverts show up as minor, the default. Is this a bug or what? 65.189.241.196 ( talk) 01:34, 22 June 2008 (UTC) (This is Kornfan71's current IP....too lazy to log in; any reply can be put on Kornfan71's talk page.)
Hello all. I have a reoccurring problem: After using huggle for a while I find a page with vandalism, click "revert and warn", the button goes grey, a note in red appears the history section - "Reverting edit to..." and then ... nothing happens. The diff doesn't update, the line in the history section disappears and it is as if I never clicked the button. When I check my contribs I find that the page has been reverted although no warning issued. Huggle still resolutely shows me the unreverted diff as the most recent revision. Once this problem starts happening it continues for every edit I do. None of them appear in the history section either. The only way around it is to close Huggle and restart it. However, the problem re-surfaces within 10 minutes of the restart. It's rather annoying! Avnjay Talk 21:17, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
I've a fealing we have to change the huggle rules in my opinion a huggle user can do around 50-100 edits a day know lets say 5% of his/her edits were mistakes. That would be 5 mistakes in one day. Know lets imagine that user uses huggle twice to three days a weak. By that time someone would have removed his Huggle/rollback rights.
p.s please move this to another article if I posted this at the wrong article. Alexnia ( talk) 09:56, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
... Enigma message 18:16, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
As huggle has been reactivated, I think the config page should be returned to a semi again. —— Ryan | t • c 09:46, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
When the article shown on the Huggle user's screen is edited, Huggle automatically updates the screen. If that happens just one microsecond before the user clicks "Revert" or "Revert and warn" (giving that user no time to react), that's when Huggle Wars occur. Now I've been on both sides of the issue, as both mistakenly warning and being mistakenly warned by other Huggle users. I believe that Huggle screens should be updated only manually (unless the article is edited by the same user whose edit is being shown). In my mind, that would solve about 95% of the Huggle Wars problem. --Blanchardb- Me• MyEars• MyMouth-timed 17:04, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Another possible idea - can you download the contents of Category:Wikipedians_who_use_Huggle on startup, and then if the previous edit was made by one of the users, pop up an 'Are you sure?' box before reverting/warning? Great app, BTW, I love it! Tim ( talk) 00:44, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
I have to say, it's nice being able to exit the program without it digitally constipating on me. Thanks very much addshore :) —— Ryan • (talk) 17:33, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
In the newer versions you can't hide the queue without having a floating dropdown box and scrollbar. It would be nice if this could be fixed. The main reason I don't like the Queue is it is distracting and gives you a sense of being under pressure. That pressure causes you to rush through stuff and make more mistakes. TIn addition to the pressure problem I also find the queue to be distracting because of how frequently it refreshes. If a configuration option could be added to allow the queue to refresh in a given time (say every 5 seconds) it would be far less distracting than it is now. -- Nn123645 ( talk) 18:00, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Actually, since I know for a fact I'll never be able to keep up with the queue, I use it for another purpose: when it grows over a certain size, it's time for me to call it a day. :-) --Blanchardb- Me• MyEars• MyMouth-timed 18:14, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
What happened to the "Revert unexplained removal of content", "Revert dubious addition of unsourced content", etc, edit summaries? They seem to have all been replaced by the generic "Reverted edits by x to last version by Y (using Huggle)". As an aside, why do they get stamped with the fact that they're from Huggle now? Celarnor Talk to me 02:51, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
First of all, i love huggle. Something that bothers me however is that at random times, for no apparent reason, huggle closes. I don't think im disconnecting from the net, and my computer is completely up to date. Could it be a problem with vista compatability? Or could it just be my computer?
Also, is there any way at all that huggle conflicts could be stopped? Would auto-whitelisting huggle users mean that they couldn't huggle conflict without the whitelisted user notice coming up? Sorry if this has been suggested before, Metagraph comment 11:30, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
I have over 1,600 and am whitelisted, and still recieve other peoples blocks/warnings. Is there a problem with my set-up or something? I'm talking about the conflicts that happen when two people with huggle revert and warn one person within like a few split seconds of each other.. does the whitelisted status get ignored or something?
Last couple of times I used Huggle, it crashed when I exited, instead of updating the whitelist. Enigma msg! 06:19, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
whats this mean? – ThatWikiGuy ( talk| life) 13:59, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
I received a deletion nomination notification at User talk:Brianjd#'Mumtaz Badruddin' listed for deletion. It links to the wrong page ( Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008 June 20 instead of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2008 June 20). I don't know whether the problem lies with the other user or the software, but the summary does say "Notification: Mumtaz Badruddin listed for deletion (using Huggle)", so I am posting this here (and only here, for now). Brian Jason Drake 14:07, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
I can't get Huggle to filter the New Pages queue to only show mainspace new pages. Is this doable? Pseudomonas( talk) 13:06, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
This is just a thought, but would it be possible to make it so that edits containing common vandal terms move to the top of the queue, similar to how Lupin's Anti-vandal tool works? Epbr123 ( talk) 13:49, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Ont he login screen if there is no project selected then huggle crashes with an unhandeled exception (can produce on 0.7.10) ·Add§hore· Talk/ Cont 18:34, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
I was just thinking but what do you guys think of a notice / new bar in huggle? Something that would display the most recent news or important messages about huggle? ·Add§hore· Talk/ Cont 18:46, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
That's all I can think up of that haven't been mentioned. Calvin 1998 ( t- c) 20:32, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
How does one nominate a Wikipedia editor for abuse of Huggle and get their ability to make mass edits of what they preceive to be "vandalism" revoked? Serious question since I see no ability to lodge formal complaints on the description of Huggle itself. 68.229.185.47 ( talk) 06:24, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Hello. I'm facing login issues with Huggle. While it once says incorrect password, a few trials later it says - "Version is too old. or later required.". This is particularly odd because I have been using Huggle since the past 4-5 days now and I never had this problem. Would anyone mind suggesting me something? TIA Mspraveen ( talk) 16:24, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
The button for the custom warning doesn't do the reverting as well, and the keyboard shortcuts (Shift-T, Shift-S, etc.) don't seem to do anything at all for me. I'd also quite like to be able to add warnings, particularly uw-biog-n and so on, which I'm currently doing by hand. Pseudomonas( talk) 16:59, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
With a bit of work I was able to hack Huggle into working through my proxy. If it would be of use to anyone, I would be happy to share the code. Bartledan ( talk) 18:04, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
I have 7.10, and now when I try to log in, I get the message "Version is too old. or later required." I didn't think version 7.10 is that old. Is there a newer version? -- Spencer T♦ C 19:15, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
I was just thinking what do you guys think of having a general huggle discussion page as well as this page for reporting bugs and feedback? Maybe split the pages up like the AWB guys have done. They have their main talk page(help), Bug reporting page(/bugs) and feature requests. Also if we do this we could adapt their template on Wikipedia_talk:AutoWikiBrowser/Bugs to be used here. ·Add§hore· Talk/ Cont 20:47, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Can you please let me use vs 0.7.10 again? When I try to use vs 0.7.11, as soon as it logs in, the "about huggle" window keeps opening again and again no matter what I do and regardless of how many times I click "OK". I have had to ctrl-alt-delete it 3 times because I didn't have enough time in between popup windows to close it normally. The program is utterly unusable. Also, if I set it not to show the queue, the frame and the scroll bar still show up. In addition, while it no longer comes up with an error message when it tries to update my configuration page, it still doesn't actually do anything. Sorry to have so many complaints in one message... J.delanoy gabs adds 00:32, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
←Not that it matters, but it works now. I love it when MS's updates that break Vista more than it already is... J.delanoy gabs adds 01:51, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
I know its not specifically related to the scope of huggle but can you add a configuration option to participate in the ClueBot Training Data Project. Using something like huggle to get the diffs would make it much easier to participate in that project :D. -- Nn123645 ( talk) 06:07, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
It might be a good idea to have a list of common mistakes made by Huggle users, which new users can be encouraged to read when downloading Huggle. I've drafted such a page here, which maybe can be developed into something that can be displayed at Wikipedia:Huggle? Epbr123 ( talk) 16:53, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Sorry to be posting so much here, but here is a rather inconsequential but slightly interesting edit summary. (no sarcasm intended) J.delanoy gabs adds 17:09, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Who is running this unauthorised bot and can anyone give me any good reason not to block it right away? – iride scent 19:56, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Cross-posted simultaneously to the /Bugs page:
System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object. at huggle.Processing.ProcessDiff(Object PreloadDataObject, BrowserTab Tab) at huggle.ReadRequests.DiffRequest.Done(Object CacheDataObject)
Calvin 1998 ( t- c) 20:11, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Looks like huggle might be starting AFD log pages in the wrong language; see [3]. It also created Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glis (2nd nomination) (since moved to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glis) although there was no previous nom (possibly because there was other stuff in the prefixindex starting with glis?). delldot talk 18:30, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
It'd be so good to have a way to revert to an arbitrary revision. When there are multiple vandals one often has to page back to find the last good version. Currently I open this in another browser and then use Twinkle, but an integrated way of doing it would be great. Pseudomonas( talk) 20:57, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
I realise people use huggle at their own risk, however say someone edits the config page to change the.. lets say edit summaries (im sure there are worse things that could be done to it, but im still not entirely sure where huggle takes over from the config page) to some warnable/banable offence. Are we still liable for our actions then? Metagraph comment 14:21, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
Where to begin... Well, these recent edit summaries "(using Huggle)" is starting to drive me insane. What happened to not advertising huggle? Why this? And, another thing, why require Rollback for this if it's not put to use? At the very least, please make the edit summary optional. If Twinkle and Friendly can be configured to make edit summaries optional, why not Huggle as well? Glacier Wolf 22:47, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
That's it :S -- Racso ( talk) 00:47, 29 June 2008 (UTC) 0.7.10 did work.
We (other users tried too) can't even log in. It always says that password is incorrect. -- Racso ( talk) 22:30, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Huggle seems to be creating incorrect log pages based on your computer's date, like this, which makes them faulty if you're not using an English computer. StaticGull Talk 11:41, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi; it's me again. I have rollbacking enabled because it is used in most cases, but in some specific cases I would like just to revert just the last edition of a user, and I can't (huggle rollbacks). ¿Can a button (or sub-button) be implemented to revert even if the last editions have been made by the same user? -- Racso ( talk) 22:35, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
If you haven't already signed, please do so here, following the format. Recommend not unindenting, also. Keep it going the way it is. Unusual request, but I think it's desirable. Enigma message 08:27, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
Would it be possible to have Huggle automatically add an AfD nomination here? StaticGull Talk 16:05, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
Notice that my huggle is not enabled [1] , yet here it is. Calvin 1998 ( t- c) 23:47, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
How about a (possibly configurable on/off) option for opening pop-up boxes for more info when the template Huggle is going to use takes variables? For example takes the (barely) optional |url= option. It would be awesome if we could include that information in the CSD tags Huggle automatically makes. Livitup ( talk) 03:50, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
I downloaded Huggle recently, and when I try to log in I get the message 'Huggle is not enabled for your account. Check configuration subpage.' But the line 'enable:true' is there in my configuration subpage. [4] What is wrong here? Chamal Talk 04:00, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
What would you think about making new-pages default to true? It looks like junk pages are created all the time, seems like we could use the help - and people who don't like RC patrolling could change to false. Huggle's RC capabilities are nifty and I'd hate to see that overlooked. -- JaGa ( talk) 06:35, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
I seems that all of the wikipedia applications are only used on Windows, can this glorious application be possibly used on a mac os??? Hamburglar617 ( talk) 16:13, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
Why did this edit remove me and a lot of other users from the user list? It looks like this was suppose to be an automated addition of a new huggle user to the list and therefore shouldn't have removed anything. -- Ron Ritzman ( talk) 17:39, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Be aware that we are talking about 2 different lists here. The userlist is something you are added to the first time you fire up huggle. It will be rebuilt if blanked. I was just curious as to why the huggle program itself would remove anybody from it. The whitelist is a separate list of both huggle and non-huggle users that huggle ignores. I was on that list before I started using huggle so I have no clue how it's populated. -- Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:35, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Would it be any use having a queue available to be populated by our watchlists (to be chosen in that drop-down menu above the queue)? Perhaps not populated by recent changes so much as showing any articles that do not have "me" as the last editor? I'd quite like to use Huggle to do a fairly intensive examination of my watchlist articles: I've been away from Wikipedia for quite a while and would like to use Huggle to browse quickly through article histories. I realise I can type in the name of any article to bring it up in Huggle but getting my watchlist queued would save a lot of hassle, I think. -- bodnotbod ( talk) 03:40, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
·Add§hore· Talk/ Cont 15:01, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
I recognise the value of labelling Huggle edits as such, but I wonder about the necessity of doing it in quite such a loud fashion. The current code is (using [[Wikipedia:HG|Huggle]])
, which provides (using
Huggle) -- an unattractive and obtrusive presence in a contributions list. Would it be possible instead to use code such as [[WP:HG|.]]
at the end of an edit summary, or even [[WP:HG|(HG)]]
if the full stop is insufficiently visible?
I for one would be much less put off using the program (silly, I know, but true) if this were either the default or a configuration option.
Many thanks. Sam Korn (smoddy) 13:40, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
I don't really feel strongly about any of this, but it kind of strikes me as odd. It's an edit summary, so the more descriptive it is, the better. Seeing Huggle spelled out doesn't strike me as loud, it just strikes me as an edit made with Huggle. -- Ned Scott 03:29, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
I'm not a computer geek, and I noticed in reading the article that there is NO DISCUSSION of the merits and demerits of Huggle, no discussion of criteria for choosing between article undo tools. Hurmata ( talk) 05:53, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I was just curious and I saw this diff. [1]. This could eb a bug in updating the list on meta although I added my name without it removing others. ·Add§hore· Talk/ Cont 16:26, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
I just tried to start huggle —as I did many many times before—, but this time I got a warning
Does anyone know how to solve this problem? Thanks in advance. :) — αἰτίας • discussion• 19:43, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Hey, I'm running Vista Business. Every time I close Huggle, I get the following error:
(snipped error message)
Phew....So, any ideas? (Sorry for the length, but it's an exact quote.) Thanks in advance. —Signed by KoЯnfan71 My Talk Sign Here! 00:43, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Ok thanks. One other thing. I have it set so that nothing is a minor change, but all reverts show up as minor, the default. Is this a bug or what? 65.189.241.196 ( talk) 01:34, 22 June 2008 (UTC) (This is Kornfan71's current IP....too lazy to log in; any reply can be put on Kornfan71's talk page.)
Hello all. I have a reoccurring problem: After using huggle for a while I find a page with vandalism, click "revert and warn", the button goes grey, a note in red appears the history section - "Reverting edit to..." and then ... nothing happens. The diff doesn't update, the line in the history section disappears and it is as if I never clicked the button. When I check my contribs I find that the page has been reverted although no warning issued. Huggle still resolutely shows me the unreverted diff as the most recent revision. Once this problem starts happening it continues for every edit I do. None of them appear in the history section either. The only way around it is to close Huggle and restart it. However, the problem re-surfaces within 10 minutes of the restart. It's rather annoying! Avnjay Talk 21:17, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
I've a fealing we have to change the huggle rules in my opinion a huggle user can do around 50-100 edits a day know lets say 5% of his/her edits were mistakes. That would be 5 mistakes in one day. Know lets imagine that user uses huggle twice to three days a weak. By that time someone would have removed his Huggle/rollback rights.
p.s please move this to another article if I posted this at the wrong article. Alexnia ( talk) 09:56, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
... Enigma message 18:16, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
As huggle has been reactivated, I think the config page should be returned to a semi again. —— Ryan | t • c 09:46, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
When the article shown on the Huggle user's screen is edited, Huggle automatically updates the screen. If that happens just one microsecond before the user clicks "Revert" or "Revert and warn" (giving that user no time to react), that's when Huggle Wars occur. Now I've been on both sides of the issue, as both mistakenly warning and being mistakenly warned by other Huggle users. I believe that Huggle screens should be updated only manually (unless the article is edited by the same user whose edit is being shown). In my mind, that would solve about 95% of the Huggle Wars problem. --Blanchardb- Me• MyEars• MyMouth-timed 17:04, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Another possible idea - can you download the contents of Category:Wikipedians_who_use_Huggle on startup, and then if the previous edit was made by one of the users, pop up an 'Are you sure?' box before reverting/warning? Great app, BTW, I love it! Tim ( talk) 00:44, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
I have to say, it's nice being able to exit the program without it digitally constipating on me. Thanks very much addshore :) —— Ryan • (talk) 17:33, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
In the newer versions you can't hide the queue without having a floating dropdown box and scrollbar. It would be nice if this could be fixed. The main reason I don't like the Queue is it is distracting and gives you a sense of being under pressure. That pressure causes you to rush through stuff and make more mistakes. TIn addition to the pressure problem I also find the queue to be distracting because of how frequently it refreshes. If a configuration option could be added to allow the queue to refresh in a given time (say every 5 seconds) it would be far less distracting than it is now. -- Nn123645 ( talk) 18:00, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Actually, since I know for a fact I'll never be able to keep up with the queue, I use it for another purpose: when it grows over a certain size, it's time for me to call it a day. :-) --Blanchardb- Me• MyEars• MyMouth-timed 18:14, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
What happened to the "Revert unexplained removal of content", "Revert dubious addition of unsourced content", etc, edit summaries? They seem to have all been replaced by the generic "Reverted edits by x to last version by Y (using Huggle)". As an aside, why do they get stamped with the fact that they're from Huggle now? Celarnor Talk to me 02:51, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
First of all, i love huggle. Something that bothers me however is that at random times, for no apparent reason, huggle closes. I don't think im disconnecting from the net, and my computer is completely up to date. Could it be a problem with vista compatability? Or could it just be my computer?
Also, is there any way at all that huggle conflicts could be stopped? Would auto-whitelisting huggle users mean that they couldn't huggle conflict without the whitelisted user notice coming up? Sorry if this has been suggested before, Metagraph comment 11:30, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
I have over 1,600 and am whitelisted, and still recieve other peoples blocks/warnings. Is there a problem with my set-up or something? I'm talking about the conflicts that happen when two people with huggle revert and warn one person within like a few split seconds of each other.. does the whitelisted status get ignored or something?
Last couple of times I used Huggle, it crashed when I exited, instead of updating the whitelist. Enigma msg! 06:19, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
whats this mean? – ThatWikiGuy ( talk| life) 13:59, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
I received a deletion nomination notification at User talk:Brianjd#'Mumtaz Badruddin' listed for deletion. It links to the wrong page ( Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008 June 20 instead of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2008 June 20). I don't know whether the problem lies with the other user or the software, but the summary does say "Notification: Mumtaz Badruddin listed for deletion (using Huggle)", so I am posting this here (and only here, for now). Brian Jason Drake 14:07, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
I can't get Huggle to filter the New Pages queue to only show mainspace new pages. Is this doable? Pseudomonas( talk) 13:06, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
This is just a thought, but would it be possible to make it so that edits containing common vandal terms move to the top of the queue, similar to how Lupin's Anti-vandal tool works? Epbr123 ( talk) 13:49, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Ont he login screen if there is no project selected then huggle crashes with an unhandeled exception (can produce on 0.7.10) ·Add§hore· Talk/ Cont 18:34, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
I was just thinking but what do you guys think of a notice / new bar in huggle? Something that would display the most recent news or important messages about huggle? ·Add§hore· Talk/ Cont 18:46, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
That's all I can think up of that haven't been mentioned. Calvin 1998 ( t- c) 20:32, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
How does one nominate a Wikipedia editor for abuse of Huggle and get their ability to make mass edits of what they preceive to be "vandalism" revoked? Serious question since I see no ability to lodge formal complaints on the description of Huggle itself. 68.229.185.47 ( talk) 06:24, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Hello. I'm facing login issues with Huggle. While it once says incorrect password, a few trials later it says - "Version is too old. or later required.". This is particularly odd because I have been using Huggle since the past 4-5 days now and I never had this problem. Would anyone mind suggesting me something? TIA Mspraveen ( talk) 16:24, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
The button for the custom warning doesn't do the reverting as well, and the keyboard shortcuts (Shift-T, Shift-S, etc.) don't seem to do anything at all for me. I'd also quite like to be able to add warnings, particularly uw-biog-n and so on, which I'm currently doing by hand. Pseudomonas( talk) 16:59, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
With a bit of work I was able to hack Huggle into working through my proxy. If it would be of use to anyone, I would be happy to share the code. Bartledan ( talk) 18:04, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
I have 7.10, and now when I try to log in, I get the message "Version is too old. or later required." I didn't think version 7.10 is that old. Is there a newer version? -- Spencer T♦ C 19:15, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
I was just thinking what do you guys think of having a general huggle discussion page as well as this page for reporting bugs and feedback? Maybe split the pages up like the AWB guys have done. They have their main talk page(help), Bug reporting page(/bugs) and feature requests. Also if we do this we could adapt their template on Wikipedia_talk:AutoWikiBrowser/Bugs to be used here. ·Add§hore· Talk/ Cont 20:47, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Can you please let me use vs 0.7.10 again? When I try to use vs 0.7.11, as soon as it logs in, the "about huggle" window keeps opening again and again no matter what I do and regardless of how many times I click "OK". I have had to ctrl-alt-delete it 3 times because I didn't have enough time in between popup windows to close it normally. The program is utterly unusable. Also, if I set it not to show the queue, the frame and the scroll bar still show up. In addition, while it no longer comes up with an error message when it tries to update my configuration page, it still doesn't actually do anything. Sorry to have so many complaints in one message... J.delanoy gabs adds 00:32, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
←Not that it matters, but it works now. I love it when MS's updates that break Vista more than it already is... J.delanoy gabs adds 01:51, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
I know its not specifically related to the scope of huggle but can you add a configuration option to participate in the ClueBot Training Data Project. Using something like huggle to get the diffs would make it much easier to participate in that project :D. -- Nn123645 ( talk) 06:07, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
It might be a good idea to have a list of common mistakes made by Huggle users, which new users can be encouraged to read when downloading Huggle. I've drafted such a page here, which maybe can be developed into something that can be displayed at Wikipedia:Huggle? Epbr123 ( talk) 16:53, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Sorry to be posting so much here, but here is a rather inconsequential but slightly interesting edit summary. (no sarcasm intended) J.delanoy gabs adds 17:09, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Who is running this unauthorised bot and can anyone give me any good reason not to block it right away? – iride scent 19:56, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Cross-posted simultaneously to the /Bugs page:
System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object. at huggle.Processing.ProcessDiff(Object PreloadDataObject, BrowserTab Tab) at huggle.ReadRequests.DiffRequest.Done(Object CacheDataObject)
Calvin 1998 ( t- c) 20:11, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Looks like huggle might be starting AFD log pages in the wrong language; see [3]. It also created Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glis (2nd nomination) (since moved to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glis) although there was no previous nom (possibly because there was other stuff in the prefixindex starting with glis?). delldot talk 18:30, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
It'd be so good to have a way to revert to an arbitrary revision. When there are multiple vandals one often has to page back to find the last good version. Currently I open this in another browser and then use Twinkle, but an integrated way of doing it would be great. Pseudomonas( talk) 20:57, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
I realise people use huggle at their own risk, however say someone edits the config page to change the.. lets say edit summaries (im sure there are worse things that could be done to it, but im still not entirely sure where huggle takes over from the config page) to some warnable/banable offence. Are we still liable for our actions then? Metagraph comment 14:21, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
Where to begin... Well, these recent edit summaries "(using Huggle)" is starting to drive me insane. What happened to not advertising huggle? Why this? And, another thing, why require Rollback for this if it's not put to use? At the very least, please make the edit summary optional. If Twinkle and Friendly can be configured to make edit summaries optional, why not Huggle as well? Glacier Wolf 22:47, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
That's it :S -- Racso ( talk) 00:47, 29 June 2008 (UTC) 0.7.10 did work.
We (other users tried too) can't even log in. It always says that password is incorrect. -- Racso ( talk) 22:30, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Huggle seems to be creating incorrect log pages based on your computer's date, like this, which makes them faulty if you're not using an English computer. StaticGull Talk 11:41, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi; it's me again. I have rollbacking enabled because it is used in most cases, but in some specific cases I would like just to revert just the last edition of a user, and I can't (huggle rollbacks). ¿Can a button (or sub-button) be implemented to revert even if the last editions have been made by the same user? -- Racso ( talk) 22:35, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
If you haven't already signed, please do so here, following the format. Recommend not unindenting, also. Keep it going the way it is. Unusual request, but I think it's desirable. Enigma message 08:27, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
Would it be possible to have Huggle automatically add an AfD nomination here? StaticGull Talk 16:05, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
Notice that my huggle is not enabled [1] , yet here it is. Calvin 1998 ( t- c) 23:47, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
How about a (possibly configurable on/off) option for opening pop-up boxes for more info when the template Huggle is going to use takes variables? For example takes the (barely) optional |url= option. It would be awesome if we could include that information in the CSD tags Huggle automatically makes. Livitup ( talk) 03:50, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
I downloaded Huggle recently, and when I try to log in I get the message 'Huggle is not enabled for your account. Check configuration subpage.' But the line 'enable:true' is there in my configuration subpage. [4] What is wrong here? Chamal Talk 04:00, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
What would you think about making new-pages default to true? It looks like junk pages are created all the time, seems like we could use the help - and people who don't like RC patrolling could change to false. Huggle's RC capabilities are nifty and I'd hate to see that overlooked. -- JaGa ( talk) 06:35, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
I seems that all of the wikipedia applications are only used on Windows, can this glorious application be possibly used on a mac os??? Hamburglar617 ( talk) 16:13, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
Why did this edit remove me and a lot of other users from the user list? It looks like this was suppose to be an automated addition of a new huggle user to the list and therefore shouldn't have removed anything. -- Ron Ritzman ( talk) 17:39, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Be aware that we are talking about 2 different lists here. The userlist is something you are added to the first time you fire up huggle. It will be rebuilt if blanked. I was just curious as to why the huggle program itself would remove anybody from it. The whitelist is a separate list of both huggle and non-huggle users that huggle ignores. I was on that list before I started using huggle so I have no clue how it's populated. -- Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:35, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Would it be any use having a queue available to be populated by our watchlists (to be chosen in that drop-down menu above the queue)? Perhaps not populated by recent changes so much as showing any articles that do not have "me" as the last editor? I'd quite like to use Huggle to do a fairly intensive examination of my watchlist articles: I've been away from Wikipedia for quite a while and would like to use Huggle to browse quickly through article histories. I realise I can type in the name of any article to bring it up in Huggle but getting my watchlist queued would save a lot of hassle, I think. -- bodnotbod ( talk) 03:40, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
·Add§hore· Talk/ Cont 15:01, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
I recognise the value of labelling Huggle edits as such, but I wonder about the necessity of doing it in quite such a loud fashion. The current code is (using [[Wikipedia:HG|Huggle]])
, which provides (using
Huggle) -- an unattractive and obtrusive presence in a contributions list. Would it be possible instead to use code such as [[WP:HG|.]]
at the end of an edit summary, or even [[WP:HG|(HG)]]
if the full stop is insufficiently visible?
I for one would be much less put off using the program (silly, I know, but true) if this were either the default or a configuration option.
Many thanks. Sam Korn (smoddy) 13:40, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
I don't really feel strongly about any of this, but it kind of strikes me as odd. It's an edit summary, so the more descriptive it is, the better. Seeing Huggle spelled out doesn't strike me as loud, it just strikes me as an edit made with Huggle. -- Ned Scott 03:29, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
I'm not a computer geek, and I noticed in reading the article that there is NO DISCUSSION of the merits and demerits of Huggle, no discussion of criteria for choosing between article undo tools. Hurmata ( talk) 05:53, 11 July 2008 (UTC)