Can you please help me edit EnderCon MagicalPrince863 ( talk) 23:46, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
I noticed that Padre Pio had multiple error messages in the references, saying "sfnp error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFCastelli2011". These arose from code such as the following: {{sfnp|Castelli|2011|pp=20, 100ff, 139ff}}. The author is trying to refer to multiple locations in that source, but when I look at the documentation for {{ sfnp}}, it does not seem to cater for this situation. I have tried a couple of ideas, including "|loc=pp.20, 100ff, 139ff" without luck, and unfortunately the error message does not show up in Preview so I only see it when I publish. I don't want to continue with trial and error on the published page - is there a way to refer to those multiple locations? Gronk Oz ( talk) 02:04, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
I am editing post East Asian cultural sphere, I just want to say that Vietnam is not really part of Sinosphere. I can't really find a proper source to substantiate this. But I dare say this because the classification of Vietnam in Sinosphere is controversial. The Vietnamese were divided into 3 camps, one pro-Vietnam faction classified as Sinosphere, one pro-Vietnam faction classified as Indosphere, the other saying that Vietnam was a mixture of Sinosphere and Indosphere. I don't know what to do. The pro-Vietnam faction belongs to Sinosphere because they love Chinese culture and especially because they are infected with toxic Chinese cultures such as movies and comics, The pro-Vietnam side belongs to Indosphere because they hate China, the rest are neutral. In addition, the original culture of Vietnam is the Dong Son culture and many other cultures before being invaded by China. If anyone knows about Vietnam, please help me find a source to prove that Vietnam does not belong to Sinosphere, I am grateful to that person. 27.3.1.242 ( talk) 02:06, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Do internal project discussions
for purposes of
WP:ECR include formal merge discussions? —
Red-tailed hawk
(nest)
02:36, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
I would like to know why my info from the Kelly Severide Page keeps getting removed when it is nothing but accurate and I have documentation to prove it. Dsummjr11 ( talk) 05:25, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
I tried to link to another section from Montana (disambiguation)#Naval vessels, but it doesn't work. Clarityfiend ( talk) 07:16, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
About five weeks ago I submitted an article on William Thompson Boos (1943-2014). As far as I know, it had been deemed appropriate in other ways, but because I am related to the subject I needed to fill out a conflict of interest form, which I did. However, I haven't heard back. It's o. k. if it's taking a while, but I don't want it to be lost in the queue. Could you kindly check to be sure it hasn't been lost?
Many thanks.
Florence S. Boos ( talk) 07:16, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia has been automatically expanding all sections when I read content on my phone. I'm using the browser version on an iPhone, I am signed in, and I've reverted to the classic vector legacy 2010 skin because the new one has a completely unacceptable layout. Whenever I open an article all of the sections automatically expand, making it annoying to find the information I'm after. Additionally, I am no longer able to locate the "expand all pages" setting in preferences. Has this issue been reported already? Strangely, when I sign out, the expand all setting comes back, but since I'm not signed in I can't save pages to my watchlist :( Devilsavocado6596 ( talk) 10:54, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi there,
I am trying to add the popular pages script to this page but I am hitting walls to what I am doing wrong. [3] Nocturnal781 ( talk) 14:08, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
To whom it may concern,
Perhaps a little more than a year ago, I established a Wiki account and began working on adding content to a page. I was interupted due to other pressing obligations. Now, as I attempt to locate the content I saved, I cannot find it. Mind you, the page never went live as it was not yet completed. Where do I find the content I saved? Yonupe ( talk) 15:48, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Are IP users allowed to vote in move requests? Treetoes023 ( talk) 17:33, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Good morning. Why is 'pseudo-Arabic' written in capitals on this page ('pseudo-Arabic'): /info/en/?search=Pseudo-Kufic, while on all other pages the term 'pseudo-Kufic' (a variant of 'pseudo-Arabic') is written differently, i.e. with 'pseudo' in lowercase? JackkBrown ( talk) 17:42, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
This article, CAN bus, has 21 inline references, and almost as many external links. However, it's a long article at 61,000 bytes. When I read it, it just feels like citations are lacking. Large sections of the article don't have any inline citations. Is this a case where "general references" can support information in an article? Is this article properly referenced?
In addition, the article goes into a lot of detail, down to the bit level of the protocol, with examples and narratives. Is this too much detail, or is it appropriate?
Finally, the level of detail appears to be what you would get from the specification itself (I have read some ISO specs) -- but you have to purchase the specification from the ISO. The spec itself (or a now-obsolete revision) is cited. Is the spec a primary source, and, are we allowed to purchase an ISO spec and then republish it in an article? David10244 ( talk) 17:50, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Having seen online practice tools included before on several pages about writing systems, I added several from one place. These changes where reverted on the basis that private tools should not be included in EL sections. Is there any consensus on whether online tools are appropriate? The guidelines on external links did not clarify anything for me. 82.43.190.243 ( talk) 19:40, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi there,
i have a problem with the population density in the Infobox. The calculation is clearly wrong in my opinion, but unfortunately I can't make any change. The value is not displayed in the source code. Am I correct and how can I fix the problem?
PS.: The article in which I would like to correct this is Magdeburg. Bildersindtoll ( talk) 19:56, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Dear Sirs and Mesdames
The [lifetime!] block recently imposed on me by Russian Wikipedia is unnecessarily harsh. Furthermore, I was given absolutely no prior warning that my "sins" were bad enough for that penalty; thus, I had no opportunity to try and rectify or remove the offending item before the ban was enforced.
In fact, it is very debatable whether I really am guilty of any serious, punishable 'incorrect behaviour', because I was only trying to be helpful - attempting to enrich their "Delta-T" site by linking to [what I believe is] a first-class diagram showing recent changes in the value of that important parameter.
Furthermore, I cannot attempt to reason with them by writing to the person who initiated it, because the block extends to not allowing me any access to their personal correspondence file!
I have uploaded the same link [showing that diagram] into the English, German, Spanish and Japanese Wikipedias - and they are all still there, available for public viewing. Certainly, none of these four sites has hinted that I deserve to be blocked.
I am quite happy *not to challenge* the deletion of my last Russian Wikipedia post regarding Delta-T... More than that - I am prepared to never contribute anything more to Russian Wikipedia, but just cannot see why [in this instance] my block there has to affect my membership of other Wikipedias [by being a 'blot' on my record].
There must presumably be a way of appealing against my ban, but my Russian is probably not good enough to investigate where and how to do that. In any event, it looks as if the conditions of my block will probably not allow me to do that!
It seems that it was "Q-bit array" who blocked me: so - may I please ask somebody to forward this complaint and request to a *different* Russian administrator, who could perhaps give a second opinion on this matter.
With thanks in anticipation, Regards, David McNaughton [Wikipedia Identifier: "DLMcN"] DLMcN ( talk) 21:16, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I have prepared a restructure of the Road signs in Ireland article in my sandbox. I was referred to here as well as the WP:Peer review page, as I would like my proposal to be approved by others rather than immediately changing it in an edit, but am unsure what is the best way to go about it. Thanks in advance, EthanL13 ( talk) 21:52, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
I wanted to connect, but an error appears. How can I connect? 망고소녀 ( talk) 23:28, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
[[en:Sanhujoriwon]]
to the wikitext of
ko:산후조리원. In addition you can add [[ko:산후조리원]]
to the redirect page but few people will see it. See more at
Help:Interlanguage links#Local links.
PrimeHunter (
talk)
00:13, 20 March 2023 (UTC)Can you please help me edit EnderCon MagicalPrince863 ( talk) 23:46, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
I noticed that Padre Pio had multiple error messages in the references, saying "sfnp error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFCastelli2011". These arose from code such as the following: {{sfnp|Castelli|2011|pp=20, 100ff, 139ff}}. The author is trying to refer to multiple locations in that source, but when I look at the documentation for {{ sfnp}}, it does not seem to cater for this situation. I have tried a couple of ideas, including "|loc=pp.20, 100ff, 139ff" without luck, and unfortunately the error message does not show up in Preview so I only see it when I publish. I don't want to continue with trial and error on the published page - is there a way to refer to those multiple locations? Gronk Oz ( talk) 02:04, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
I am editing post East Asian cultural sphere, I just want to say that Vietnam is not really part of Sinosphere. I can't really find a proper source to substantiate this. But I dare say this because the classification of Vietnam in Sinosphere is controversial. The Vietnamese were divided into 3 camps, one pro-Vietnam faction classified as Sinosphere, one pro-Vietnam faction classified as Indosphere, the other saying that Vietnam was a mixture of Sinosphere and Indosphere. I don't know what to do. The pro-Vietnam faction belongs to Sinosphere because they love Chinese culture and especially because they are infected with toxic Chinese cultures such as movies and comics, The pro-Vietnam side belongs to Indosphere because they hate China, the rest are neutral. In addition, the original culture of Vietnam is the Dong Son culture and many other cultures before being invaded by China. If anyone knows about Vietnam, please help me find a source to prove that Vietnam does not belong to Sinosphere, I am grateful to that person. 27.3.1.242 ( talk) 02:06, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Do internal project discussions
for purposes of
WP:ECR include formal merge discussions? —
Red-tailed hawk
(nest)
02:36, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
I would like to know why my info from the Kelly Severide Page keeps getting removed when it is nothing but accurate and I have documentation to prove it. Dsummjr11 ( talk) 05:25, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
I tried to link to another section from Montana (disambiguation)#Naval vessels, but it doesn't work. Clarityfiend ( talk) 07:16, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
About five weeks ago I submitted an article on William Thompson Boos (1943-2014). As far as I know, it had been deemed appropriate in other ways, but because I am related to the subject I needed to fill out a conflict of interest form, which I did. However, I haven't heard back. It's o. k. if it's taking a while, but I don't want it to be lost in the queue. Could you kindly check to be sure it hasn't been lost?
Many thanks.
Florence S. Boos ( talk) 07:16, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia has been automatically expanding all sections when I read content on my phone. I'm using the browser version on an iPhone, I am signed in, and I've reverted to the classic vector legacy 2010 skin because the new one has a completely unacceptable layout. Whenever I open an article all of the sections automatically expand, making it annoying to find the information I'm after. Additionally, I am no longer able to locate the "expand all pages" setting in preferences. Has this issue been reported already? Strangely, when I sign out, the expand all setting comes back, but since I'm not signed in I can't save pages to my watchlist :( Devilsavocado6596 ( talk) 10:54, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi there,
I am trying to add the popular pages script to this page but I am hitting walls to what I am doing wrong. [3] Nocturnal781 ( talk) 14:08, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
To whom it may concern,
Perhaps a little more than a year ago, I established a Wiki account and began working on adding content to a page. I was interupted due to other pressing obligations. Now, as I attempt to locate the content I saved, I cannot find it. Mind you, the page never went live as it was not yet completed. Where do I find the content I saved? Yonupe ( talk) 15:48, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Are IP users allowed to vote in move requests? Treetoes023 ( talk) 17:33, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Good morning. Why is 'pseudo-Arabic' written in capitals on this page ('pseudo-Arabic'): /info/en/?search=Pseudo-Kufic, while on all other pages the term 'pseudo-Kufic' (a variant of 'pseudo-Arabic') is written differently, i.e. with 'pseudo' in lowercase? JackkBrown ( talk) 17:42, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
This article, CAN bus, has 21 inline references, and almost as many external links. However, it's a long article at 61,000 bytes. When I read it, it just feels like citations are lacking. Large sections of the article don't have any inline citations. Is this a case where "general references" can support information in an article? Is this article properly referenced?
In addition, the article goes into a lot of detail, down to the bit level of the protocol, with examples and narratives. Is this too much detail, or is it appropriate?
Finally, the level of detail appears to be what you would get from the specification itself (I have read some ISO specs) -- but you have to purchase the specification from the ISO. The spec itself (or a now-obsolete revision) is cited. Is the spec a primary source, and, are we allowed to purchase an ISO spec and then republish it in an article? David10244 ( talk) 17:50, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Having seen online practice tools included before on several pages about writing systems, I added several from one place. These changes where reverted on the basis that private tools should not be included in EL sections. Is there any consensus on whether online tools are appropriate? The guidelines on external links did not clarify anything for me. 82.43.190.243 ( talk) 19:40, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi there,
i have a problem with the population density in the Infobox. The calculation is clearly wrong in my opinion, but unfortunately I can't make any change. The value is not displayed in the source code. Am I correct and how can I fix the problem?
PS.: The article in which I would like to correct this is Magdeburg. Bildersindtoll ( talk) 19:56, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Dear Sirs and Mesdames
The [lifetime!] block recently imposed on me by Russian Wikipedia is unnecessarily harsh. Furthermore, I was given absolutely no prior warning that my "sins" were bad enough for that penalty; thus, I had no opportunity to try and rectify or remove the offending item before the ban was enforced.
In fact, it is very debatable whether I really am guilty of any serious, punishable 'incorrect behaviour', because I was only trying to be helpful - attempting to enrich their "Delta-T" site by linking to [what I believe is] a first-class diagram showing recent changes in the value of that important parameter.
Furthermore, I cannot attempt to reason with them by writing to the person who initiated it, because the block extends to not allowing me any access to their personal correspondence file!
I have uploaded the same link [showing that diagram] into the English, German, Spanish and Japanese Wikipedias - and they are all still there, available for public viewing. Certainly, none of these four sites has hinted that I deserve to be blocked.
I am quite happy *not to challenge* the deletion of my last Russian Wikipedia post regarding Delta-T... More than that - I am prepared to never contribute anything more to Russian Wikipedia, but just cannot see why [in this instance] my block there has to affect my membership of other Wikipedias [by being a 'blot' on my record].
There must presumably be a way of appealing against my ban, but my Russian is probably not good enough to investigate where and how to do that. In any event, it looks as if the conditions of my block will probably not allow me to do that!
It seems that it was "Q-bit array" who blocked me: so - may I please ask somebody to forward this complaint and request to a *different* Russian administrator, who could perhaps give a second opinion on this matter.
With thanks in anticipation, Regards, David McNaughton [Wikipedia Identifier: "DLMcN"] DLMcN ( talk) 21:16, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I have prepared a restructure of the Road signs in Ireland article in my sandbox. I was referred to here as well as the WP:Peer review page, as I would like my proposal to be approved by others rather than immediately changing it in an edit, but am unsure what is the best way to go about it. Thanks in advance, EthanL13 ( talk) 21:52, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
I wanted to connect, but an error appears. How can I connect? 망고소녀 ( talk) 23:28, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
[[en:Sanhujoriwon]]
to the wikitext of
ko:산후조리원. In addition you can add [[ko:산후조리원]]
to the redirect page but few people will see it. See more at
Help:Interlanguage links#Local links.
PrimeHunter (
talk)
00:13, 20 March 2023 (UTC)