Could this image be cropped (and uploaded as a separate file) so that it is a profile picture of Craven (guy on the right). Thanks --
Gaia Octavia AgrippaTalk 13:40, 17 September 2016 (UTC)reply
To be honest, that's really blurry! Could you try a smaller size? Its only for an infobox so if the only way it isn't blurry is to have it quite small that would be fine. Thanks,
Gaia Octavia AgrippaTalk 22:50, 17 September 2016 (UTC)reply
The image will automatically display in the infobox at a smaller size and look fine no matter what size it is on the image's host page. It looks "blurry" at the larger size because the
image from which it was derived is very small to begin with. If there is a larger version available somewhere then let me know and I can make a higher resolution derivative version, but I have been
unable to find one.
Centpacrr (
talk) 03:39, 18 September 2016 (UTC)reply
It still looks blurry even at a smaller size. Could you please have another go at cropping the original picture? Don't make the crop any bigger/blow it up/stretch it (or what ever that's called in technical terms), leaving it as it its original size. As long as its just Craven in the picture, I don't mind how much of his body/the background need including to make it a reasonable size. Better for him to be "far away" and crisp, than a close up that is blurry. Thank you for your help,
Gaia Octavia AgrippaTalk 16:21, 18 September 2016 (UTC)reply
A direct crop from the largest available original looks like
this. Is that what you really want for an infobox image?
Centpacrr (
talk) 20:51, 18 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Thank you for trying. I can see now its not going to work. Could you please try with the new picture I've added above? Thanks,
Gaia Octavia AgrippaTalk 22:11, 18 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Please create a better crop of the USS Vandalia (1828) from the large version of the image (above). Thanks. --
KAVEBEAR (
talk) 00:09, 6 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Because the camera is several miles away from the subject of the photo, there are several miles worth of haze in this image. Is it practical to re-do the color levels so that it doesn't look so hazy, e.g. going to levels comparable to the island at the center of
File:Cave-in-Rock Island from ferry.jpg? If so, please do it, but of course I understand if it's not possible.
Nyttend (
talk) 00:28, 6 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Wow, quite the difference. Thanks a lot!
Nyttend (
talk) 03:50, 6 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Reworked to be closer to the example image given, without colour issues in sky, or odd contrast issues in trees. Requester to revert if preferred. (
Hohum@) 11:08, 6 August 2016 (UTC)reply
I have scanned two images (above) of illustrations but they are grey instead of white background. The difference between two good scans and the scans I've done can be seen
here. Thanks.
Mike Christie (
talk -
contribs -
library) 00:42, 25 July 2016 (UTC)reply
A couple more scanned old illustrations that I would like to get whitened. This time I have left them just as they came through the scan, so the ink needs to be darkened too -- I figured it was best to leave the processing to someone who knows what they're doing. Thanks for the help.
Mike Christie (
talk -
contribs -
library) 02:17, 26 July 2016 (UTC)reply
This was a Chicago Sun Times photo.
We hope, who is helping me with the photo, advised me to resize it and upload it for the article. We hope said you could remove the watermark and to give you
the photo link because it's better to work on a larger copy. We hope said you should be able to remove the watermark and reduce the size of the now unwatermarked photo. I am hoping you can assist me, as it is the only known photograph of her.
SusunW (
talk) 17:15, 17 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Graphist opinion(s)
Done wmr; crp; reduce to 250x250px
Centpacrr (
talk) 19:55, 17 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Thank you, thank you, thank you! It looks awesome.
SusunW (
talk) 20:35, 17 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Can
you remove the background please of all those images once more. I'll be using them in a template Thanks a lot Which tool do you use to do this?VarunFEB2003Offline when signed 13:03, 31 August 2016 (UTC)reply
I request a white background for two images. The first image can be cropped to focus more on the atomizer. The atomizer is a bit unclean. If possible can it be
photoshopped to clean the inside of the atomizer? The second image can also be cropped to focus only on the label in the middle. The other two labels in the background are unfocused and unusable. Only the one in the middle is readable.
QuackGuru (
talk) 23:59, 23 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Also did the same with the first image:
File:Dripping Atomizer crop.png,
File:Dripping Atomizer crop.jpg. I wasn't keen on the results I got trying the "cleaning"
you suggested, so I abandoned that idea, but there are versions of my poor attempt you can look at in the file histories (go to Commons file pages)... --Begoon 07:33, 24 September 2016 (UTC)reply
The images are outstanding. I selected the jpg version for both images.
QuackGuru (
talk) 17:24, 24 September 2016 (UTC)reply
I request a white background for three images. The first image can be cropped to focus more on the rebuildable dripping atomizer (RDA). The second image can also be cropped to focus on the RDA deck. The third image can be cropped and slightly rotated. The third image seems to be slightly slanting downwards to the right. All three images can be uploaded using the jpg thumbnail.
QuackGuru (
talk) 20:35, 24 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Note that I still provided additional png versions because: jpg cannot have transparent background (limitation of jpg format), they could be useful, and additional image very quick to create at the same time from same master. --Begoon 04:28, 26 September 2016 (UTC)reply
The jpg thumbnails are very sharp and not blurry. Thanks for all your time and attention.
QuackGuru (
talk) 17:21, 26 September 2016 (UTC)reply
I request the image be cropped with a transparent background
like this to look
like this. If the image is blurry then it can be uploaded using a jpg thumbnail.
QuackGuru (
talk) 20:08, 24 September 2016 (UTC)reply
The gif thumbnail is clearer and more vivid. Good job!
QuackGuru (
talk) 02:26, 27 September 2016 (UTC)reply
For this image the gif worked out ok. Often that is not the case, though, because the gif palette is limited, so for detailed full colour photos it can give poorer results. What would be ideal would be if wmf fixed the thumbnailing of png files so that they don't blur. It's annoying. Look at any of the png files here, or in the e-cig sections above at full size and they are clear and sharp, as good as the jpg images - the difference is only when thumbs are generated by wikimedia software - jpg stay sharp, png blur... --Begoon 02:45, 27 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Only when I looked at full size e-cigs images both the jpg images and png images were identical. The images I selected are as good as they can get. The gif image is sharper than even the jpg image.
QuackGuru (
talk) 03:19, 27 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Hello, please remove the watermarks in the images. If possible too, please improve the quality of the portraits. Thank you... --
203.215.117.43 (
talk) 03:38, 19 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Please drop a bio image for
Roger de Pont L'Évêque. He seems to be the figure on the young king's left with Latin text above his head.… --
KAVEBEAR (
talk) 18:49, 29 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Graphist opinion(s)
File:Roger de Pont L'Évêque.jpg.) It's not good resolution, because it's such a small portion. There's a version in the file history, if
you prefer, which is just a crop before I removed extraneous detail. It's a fairly below average cropped image, in the end - but there it is anyway... --Begoon 04:55, 23 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Could this image be cropped (and uploaded as a separate file) so that it is a profile picture of Craven (guy on the right). Thanks --
Gaia Octavia AgrippaTalk 13:40, 17 September 2016 (UTC)reply
To be honest, that's really blurry! Could you try a smaller size? Its only for an infobox so if the only way it isn't blurry is to have it quite small that would be fine. Thanks,
Gaia Octavia AgrippaTalk 22:50, 17 September 2016 (UTC)reply
The image will automatically display in the infobox at a smaller size and look fine no matter what size it is on the image's host page. It looks "blurry" at the larger size because the
image from which it was derived is very small to begin with. If there is a larger version available somewhere then let me know and I can make a higher resolution derivative version, but I have been
unable to find one.
Centpacrr (
talk) 03:39, 18 September 2016 (UTC)reply
It still looks blurry even at a smaller size. Could you please have another go at cropping the original picture? Don't make the crop any bigger/blow it up/stretch it (or what ever that's called in technical terms), leaving it as it its original size. As long as its just Craven in the picture, I don't mind how much of his body/the background need including to make it a reasonable size. Better for him to be "far away" and crisp, than a close up that is blurry. Thank you for your help,
Gaia Octavia AgrippaTalk 16:21, 18 September 2016 (UTC)reply
A direct crop from the largest available original looks like
this. Is that what you really want for an infobox image?
Centpacrr (
talk) 20:51, 18 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Thank you for trying. I can see now its not going to work. Could you please try with the new picture I've added above? Thanks,
Gaia Octavia AgrippaTalk 22:11, 18 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Please create a better crop of the USS Vandalia (1828) from the large version of the image (above). Thanks. --
KAVEBEAR (
talk) 00:09, 6 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Because the camera is several miles away from the subject of the photo, there are several miles worth of haze in this image. Is it practical to re-do the color levels so that it doesn't look so hazy, e.g. going to levels comparable to the island at the center of
File:Cave-in-Rock Island from ferry.jpg? If so, please do it, but of course I understand if it's not possible.
Nyttend (
talk) 00:28, 6 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Wow, quite the difference. Thanks a lot!
Nyttend (
talk) 03:50, 6 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Reworked to be closer to the example image given, without colour issues in sky, or odd contrast issues in trees. Requester to revert if preferred. (
Hohum@) 11:08, 6 August 2016 (UTC)reply
I have scanned two images (above) of illustrations but they are grey instead of white background. The difference between two good scans and the scans I've done can be seen
here. Thanks.
Mike Christie (
talk -
contribs -
library) 00:42, 25 July 2016 (UTC)reply
A couple more scanned old illustrations that I would like to get whitened. This time I have left them just as they came through the scan, so the ink needs to be darkened too -- I figured it was best to leave the processing to someone who knows what they're doing. Thanks for the help.
Mike Christie (
talk -
contribs -
library) 02:17, 26 July 2016 (UTC)reply
This was a Chicago Sun Times photo.
We hope, who is helping me with the photo, advised me to resize it and upload it for the article. We hope said you could remove the watermark and to give you
the photo link because it's better to work on a larger copy. We hope said you should be able to remove the watermark and reduce the size of the now unwatermarked photo. I am hoping you can assist me, as it is the only known photograph of her.
SusunW (
talk) 17:15, 17 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Graphist opinion(s)
Done wmr; crp; reduce to 250x250px
Centpacrr (
talk) 19:55, 17 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Thank you, thank you, thank you! It looks awesome.
SusunW (
talk) 20:35, 17 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Can
you remove the background please of all those images once more. I'll be using them in a template Thanks a lot Which tool do you use to do this?VarunFEB2003Offline when signed 13:03, 31 August 2016 (UTC)reply
I request a white background for two images. The first image can be cropped to focus more on the atomizer. The atomizer is a bit unclean. If possible can it be
photoshopped to clean the inside of the atomizer? The second image can also be cropped to focus only on the label in the middle. The other two labels in the background are unfocused and unusable. Only the one in the middle is readable.
QuackGuru (
talk) 23:59, 23 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Also did the same with the first image:
File:Dripping Atomizer crop.png,
File:Dripping Atomizer crop.jpg. I wasn't keen on the results I got trying the "cleaning"
you suggested, so I abandoned that idea, but there are versions of my poor attempt you can look at in the file histories (go to Commons file pages)... --Begoon 07:33, 24 September 2016 (UTC)reply
The images are outstanding. I selected the jpg version for both images.
QuackGuru (
talk) 17:24, 24 September 2016 (UTC)reply
I request a white background for three images. The first image can be cropped to focus more on the rebuildable dripping atomizer (RDA). The second image can also be cropped to focus on the RDA deck. The third image can be cropped and slightly rotated. The third image seems to be slightly slanting downwards to the right. All three images can be uploaded using the jpg thumbnail.
QuackGuru (
talk) 20:35, 24 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Note that I still provided additional png versions because: jpg cannot have transparent background (limitation of jpg format), they could be useful, and additional image very quick to create at the same time from same master. --Begoon 04:28, 26 September 2016 (UTC)reply
The jpg thumbnails are very sharp and not blurry. Thanks for all your time and attention.
QuackGuru (
talk) 17:21, 26 September 2016 (UTC)reply
I request the image be cropped with a transparent background
like this to look
like this. If the image is blurry then it can be uploaded using a jpg thumbnail.
QuackGuru (
talk) 20:08, 24 September 2016 (UTC)reply
The gif thumbnail is clearer and more vivid. Good job!
QuackGuru (
talk) 02:26, 27 September 2016 (UTC)reply
For this image the gif worked out ok. Often that is not the case, though, because the gif palette is limited, so for detailed full colour photos it can give poorer results. What would be ideal would be if wmf fixed the thumbnailing of png files so that they don't blur. It's annoying. Look at any of the png files here, or in the e-cig sections above at full size and they are clear and sharp, as good as the jpg images - the difference is only when thumbs are generated by wikimedia software - jpg stay sharp, png blur... --Begoon 02:45, 27 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Only when I looked at full size e-cigs images both the jpg images and png images were identical. The images I selected are as good as they can get. The gif image is sharper than even the jpg image.
QuackGuru (
talk) 03:19, 27 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Hello, please remove the watermarks in the images. If possible too, please improve the quality of the portraits. Thank you... --
203.215.117.43 (
talk) 03:38, 19 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Please drop a bio image for
Roger de Pont L'Évêque. He seems to be the figure on the young king's left with Latin text above his head.… --
KAVEBEAR (
talk) 18:49, 29 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Graphist opinion(s)
File:Roger de Pont L'Évêque.jpg.) It's not good resolution, because it's such a small portion. There's a version in the file history, if
you prefer, which is just a crop before I removed extraneous detail. It's a fairly below average cropped image, in the end - but there it is anyway... --Begoon 04:55, 23 September 2016 (UTC)reply