The result of the discussion was: delete. It's also unclear if the uploader even owns the rights to the image as it had appeared elsewhere prior to the upload to Wikipedia. Ixfd64 ( talk) 17:05, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
GFDL only is no longer a valid license per Template:No more GFDL. MGA73 ( talk) 12:40, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: convert to non-free - FASTILY 02:12, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
GFDL only is no longer a valid license per Template:No more GFDL. MGA73 ( talk) 12:40, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
GFDL only is no longer a valid license per Template:No more GFDL. MGA73 ( talk) 12:41, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: convert to non-free - FASTILY 02:12, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
GFDL only is no longer a valid license per Template:No more GFDL. MGA73 ( talk) 12:42, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Photo of Lilabati Bhattacharjee. My guess is that the photo is from 1950-1960 and uploader claimed that the photo is from from the personal collection of Dr Subrata Bhattacherjee. Uploader User:BudhadityaBhattacharyya is blocked as a sock. To me the names look similar so I guess it is a family photo. But can we AGF here or should we delete? The photo could easily be Template:PD-India so it is not likely a violation of copyright. MGA73 ( talk) 13:58, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
This image of a building is claimed to be PD because of publication without notice between 1928 and 1977. This claim is based on the building having been demolished in 1950 so the photo must be 1950 or earlier, and th uploader cannot find evidence of a copyright notice. However, there is no information about where and when this image was originally published to evaluate this claim for PD. Whpq ( talk) 15:35, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:35, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Non-free image of a living person :3 F4U ( they /it) 16:14, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Note: This discussion originated on WP:MFD, before User: Glades12 pointed out it should be here, instead. I've taken the liberty of moving the discussion.-- Jerome Frank Disciple ( talk) 17:47, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Non-free image of a living person :3 F4U ( they /it) 16:14, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Moot/not actionable. The "replacement" on Commons has been nominated for deletion as per the discussion below, nothing left to do here - FASTILY 23:44, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
I don't think we need this non-free image anymore as NASA has released its own rendering of the orbiter. [1] Ixfd64 ( talk) 19:14, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Image is of a living person, uploaded as a non-free image as the source does not have a compatible license. This fails WP:NFCC#1 as this is a living person and there could be a free equivalent available or that could be taken by someone. Ravensfire ( talk) 20:01, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Fails NFCC#1 - this is of a living person Ravensfire ( talk) 20:29, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Fails NFCC#1 - image is of a living person Ravensfire ( talk) 20:29, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:36, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation for all their uploads Doctorhawkes ( talk) 21:55, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. It's also unclear if the uploader even owns the rights to the image as it had appeared elsewhere prior to the upload to Wikipedia. Ixfd64 ( talk) 17:05, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
GFDL only is no longer a valid license per Template:No more GFDL. MGA73 ( talk) 12:40, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: convert to non-free - FASTILY 02:12, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
GFDL only is no longer a valid license per Template:No more GFDL. MGA73 ( talk) 12:40, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
GFDL only is no longer a valid license per Template:No more GFDL. MGA73 ( talk) 12:41, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: convert to non-free - FASTILY 02:12, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
GFDL only is no longer a valid license per Template:No more GFDL. MGA73 ( talk) 12:42, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Photo of Lilabati Bhattacharjee. My guess is that the photo is from 1950-1960 and uploader claimed that the photo is from from the personal collection of Dr Subrata Bhattacherjee. Uploader User:BudhadityaBhattacharyya is blocked as a sock. To me the names look similar so I guess it is a family photo. But can we AGF here or should we delete? The photo could easily be Template:PD-India so it is not likely a violation of copyright. MGA73 ( talk) 13:58, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
This image of a building is claimed to be PD because of publication without notice between 1928 and 1977. This claim is based on the building having been demolished in 1950 so the photo must be 1950 or earlier, and th uploader cannot find evidence of a copyright notice. However, there is no information about where and when this image was originally published to evaluate this claim for PD. Whpq ( talk) 15:35, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:35, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Non-free image of a living person :3 F4U ( they /it) 16:14, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Note: This discussion originated on WP:MFD, before User: Glades12 pointed out it should be here, instead. I've taken the liberty of moving the discussion.-- Jerome Frank Disciple ( talk) 17:47, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Non-free image of a living person :3 F4U ( they /it) 16:14, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Moot/not actionable. The "replacement" on Commons has been nominated for deletion as per the discussion below, nothing left to do here - FASTILY 23:44, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
I don't think we need this non-free image anymore as NASA has released its own rendering of the orbiter. [1] Ixfd64 ( talk) 19:14, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Image is of a living person, uploaded as a non-free image as the source does not have a compatible license. This fails WP:NFCC#1 as this is a living person and there could be a free equivalent available or that could be taken by someone. Ravensfire ( talk) 20:01, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Fails NFCC#1 - this is of a living person Ravensfire ( talk) 20:29, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Fails NFCC#1 - image is of a living person Ravensfire ( talk) 20:29, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:36, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation for all their uploads Doctorhawkes ( talk) 21:55, 7 April 2023 (UTC)