September 9
File:Carl's Park.JPG
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:Carl's Park.JPG ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Slab rider45 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Orphaned, low-quality blurry photo. Not worth moving to Commons. ✗ plicit 10:28, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Alcazargay.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:Alcazargay.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Londonstan ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Orphaned, low-quality photo of Alcazar (group). The images in Category:Alcazar (musical group) serve as better alternatives. ✗ plicit 10:54, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, redundant and poor quality compared to the Commons files. Salavat ( talk) 14:51, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Amador Valley High School.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:Amador Valley High School.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Xiphos ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Orphaned, near duplicate of File:Amador Valley and Pleasanton Ridge.jpg. The only difference is straightening and a slight crop. ✗ plicit 11:00, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Phillip Jablonski mug shot.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Relicensed per commons tag, No local objections expressed. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 10:20, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:Phillip Jablonski mug shot.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Momoricks ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Booking photo by Californian govt entity, Why is this under NFCC when the Commons one is under a PD-CAGov style licence? ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 12:16, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Photo of Caroline Emily Nevill.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:25, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:Photo of Caroline Emily Nevill.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by WomenArtistUpdates ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Notwithstanding the NPG copyright claim, this is an old image. Why is it under NFCC, when the commons version is PD? ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 12:18, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Photo of Elizabeth Pulman.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:25, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:Photo of Elizabeth Pulman.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by WomenArtistUpdates ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Commons equivalent is apparently PD. Why is the local copy under NFCC? ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 12:18, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Planned Parenthood logo.svg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:25, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:Planned Parenthood logo.svg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Armbrust ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Other than the stylized leaves/ P (left), why is this under NFCC, when the equivalent image on Commons is considered "simple"? ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 12:20, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Princeton Univ seal.svg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn/Deleted as F8 , A file from Commons with the same name is now visible. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 10:33, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:Princeton Univ seal.svg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jamil.V.Estorninos ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Considered to be a PD design at Commons c:File:Princeton seal.svg, why under NFCC locally? ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 12:37, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Quality-Control Logo2.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:25, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:Quality-Control Logo2.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bandittx ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Other than the gradient, this is a text logo- ( c:File:Quality-Control Music logo.jpg is considered simple.) ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 12:49, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Rachel Barrett - Suffragette.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:Rachel Barrett - Suffragette.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by FruitMonkey ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Attributed to Lena Connell (1875-1949), so PD in UK. Why under NFCC? ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 12:53, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Radisson Blu logo.svg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn/Deleted as F8 , A file from Commons with the same name is now visible. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 10:34, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:Radisson Blu logo.svg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Benstown ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Text logo , free at Commons c:File:Radisson Blu logo.svg ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 12:53, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Radyo5 its fresh.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: No action. Currently nominated for DR at Commons, we can revisit this matter if the Commons file is kept - FASTILY 03:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:Radyo5 its fresh.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by 718 Bot ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Text logo - free at Commons c:File:Radyo5 its fresh logo.png but unsourced. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 12:55, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:TheGroup!.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:TheGroup!.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Allangauld ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Orphan, unclear subject, blurry. May be a screen capture. --- Possibly ☎ 13:19, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Rebellion Developments logo.svg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: No action. Currently nominated for DR at Commons, we can revisit this matter if the Commons file is kept - FASTILY 03:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:Rebellion Developments logo.svg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by IceWelder ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
c:File:Rebellion Developments logo.svg is considered a text-logo. Is it is because it's above UK TOO that it's under NFCC here? ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 13:42, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- ShakespeareFan00, the rationale on Commons is obviously incorrect with the user claiming to be the author. The UK TOO is incredibly low, so I nominated the Commons version for deletion. The non-free version here should be kept. IceWelder [ ✉] 12:38, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Robotmonster.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:10, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:Robotmonster.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Philbertgray ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Common claims this poster art as PD by virture of no notice. Why under NFCC locally? ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 17:00, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Serbian Party Oathkeepers logo.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: No action. Currently nominated for DR at Commons, we can revisit this matter if the Commons file is kept - FASTILY 03:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:Serbian Party Oathkeepers logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Elserbio00 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Commons considered this a simple logo, Other than the circular elements there is only text forming this. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 18:43, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:SkyWayLogo.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: No action. Currently nominated for DR at Commons, we can revisit this matter if the Commons file is kept - FASTILY 03:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:SkyWayLogo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Begoon ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Other than the gradient on the S/W, I am seeing a text logo. Why under NFCC? ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 18:59, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Social Democratic Party of Finland logo.svg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:06, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:Social Democratic Party of Finland logo.svg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Pudeo ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Commons c:File:Sozialdemokratische Partei Finnlands Logo.svg considers this a simple logo. Why is it under NFCC locally? ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 19:09, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Squares crisps designs.jpeg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Textbook WP:NFCC#8 violation. No prejudice to restoration if the article is significantly expanded to explicitly discuss this image in-depth - FASTILY 03:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:Squares crisps designs.jpeg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sahaib3005 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
This non-free collage of product packages is being used to "show all the different logos and designs of Squares", but there is no significant sourced commentary about any of the iterations of packaging and/or logos. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Whpq ( talk) 21:10, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
User:Whpq, I apologise for not adding commentary before, it is mentioned throughout the article. I have added a caption that reads: "Old packets of Squares from left to right: Square Crisps (1980s to 1990s), Square (1990s to early 2000s), Squares (late 2000s) and Squares (late 2000s to 2019)". If that is not enough, then I can add more commentary. Please don’t delete it. Sahaib3005 ( talk) 21:22, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
User:Whpq, I have added a whole section about the design of the packaging. If that is not enough, I don’t know what is. Can you remove your deletion request now? Sahaib3005 ( talk) 20:23, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
User:Whpq, I see that you have made edits after I made my previous comment. So either you’re purposely ignoring me or you didn’t see it. I just want you look at the new changes I made to Squares (crisps). Thanks. Sahaib3005 ( talk) 09:35, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- @ Sahaib3005: It's rather rude to demand that I immediately review your work. I will look at tings in due time. This discussion is open for a minimum of 7 days. -- Whpq ( talk) 11:02, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- @ Sahaib3005: The section you added is sourced to Pinterest, Youtube, and stock photos. That's not the sort of sourcing that is needed. -- Whpq ( talk) 16:00, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Twelve O'clock High Gregory Peck.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Textbook WP:NFCC#8 violation. No prejudice to restoration if the article is significantly expanded to explicitly discuss this image in-depth - FASTILY 03:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:Twelve O'clock High Gregory Peck.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Beyond My Ken ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
The screenshot is used in the plot section of Twelve O'Clock High against WP:FILMNFI in that the plot section describes the film and is not critical commentary of the image itself. The fair use rationale states its purpose is "The image is being used to illustrate an article about the film depicted in the image." The image fails WP:NFCC#3a since the poster already illustrates the article and there is no critical commentary of the image itself in the article, it does nothing to increase the reader's understanding of the film and its exclusion is not detrimental to the understanding of the film, thereby failing WP:NFCC#8. Aspects ( talk) 23:50, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- The image is not a screenshot, it is a publicity shot with no indication of copyright. It illustrates Gregory Peck as the character he plays in the film, which is inherently illustrative of the film. Images do not have to be connected to the section in which they appear, but to the article as a whole. Yet another example of Aspects personal crusade to eliminate as many images as possible from Wikipedia, and minimize as small as possible those he allows to remain. These edits are detrimental to the usefulness of the encyclopedia. Beyond My Ken ( talk) 20:57, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
- You uploaded the file thirteen years ago with the licensing stating that the file is a screenshot, so it seems convenient that when someone holds it to that standard, you claim the fair use rationale is incorrect, which if true you could have fixed it for years and the rationale still states it is a screenshot after this comment. Fair use files do have to be connected to the sections they are used in and need to have critical commentary for them to pass WP:NFCC. In all of these files for discussion that I have brought about files you have uploaded, you have never once addressed the critical commentary that is necessary for these screenshots to pass WP:NFCC, which is why the discussions have been closed as delete. In the future, I would advise you to not discuss other editors' actions in files for discussion and my edits are not "detrimental to the usefulness of the encyclopedia" since the the screenshots lack critical commentary to pass WP:NFCC and nothing in this comment shows how the file passes WP:NFCC#3a or WP:NFCC#8. Aspects ( talk) 22:57, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Twelve O'clock High.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Textbook WP:NFCC#8 violation. No prejudice to restoration if the article is significantly expanded to explicitly discuss this image in-depth - FASTILY 03:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:Twelve O'clock High.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Beyond My Ken ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
The screenshot is used in the Cast section of A Matter of Life and Death (film). The fair use rationale states its purpose is "The image is being used to illustrate an article about the film depicted in the image." The image fails WP:NFCC#3a since the poster already illustrates the article and there is no critical commentary of the image itself, it does nothing to increase the reader's understanding of the film and its exclusion is not detrimental to the understanding of the film, thereby failing WP:NFCC#8. Aspects ( talk) 23:52, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- The image shows major characters as they appear in the film, which is inherently illustrative of the film. The rationale clearly spells out the usefulness of the image to the film, and it is not duplicate of the poster. Yet another example of Aspects' personal crusade to eliminate as many images as possible from Wikipedia, and minimize as small as possible those he allows to remain. These edits are detrimental to the usefulness of the encyclopedia. Beyond My Ken ( talk) 21:00, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
- Readers do not need to see the cast of a film in character or in relationship to each other to understand the film. If so, every film would have a screenshot. I quoted what the fair use rationale states so there is nothing that "clearly spells out the usefulness of the image in the film". I never stated that the screenshot was a duplicate for the poster, but that if the screenshot it illustrating the film, that the poster already does that, thereby failing WP:NFCC. In all of these files for discussion that I have brought about files you have uploaded, you have never once addressed the critical commentary that is necessary for these screenshots to pass WP:NFCC, which is why the discussions have been closed as delete. In the future, I would advise you to not discuss other editors' actions in files for discussion and my edits are not "detrimental to the usefulness of the encyclopedia" since the the screenshots lack critical commentary to pass WP:NFCC and nothing in this comment shows how the file passes WP:NFCC#3a or WP:NFCC#8. Aspects ( talk) 22:57, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
September 9
File:Carl's Park.JPG
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:Carl's Park.JPG ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Slab rider45 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Orphaned, low-quality blurry photo. Not worth moving to Commons. ✗ plicit 10:28, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Alcazargay.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:Alcazargay.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Londonstan ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Orphaned, low-quality photo of Alcazar (group). The images in Category:Alcazar (musical group) serve as better alternatives. ✗ plicit 10:54, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, redundant and poor quality compared to the Commons files. Salavat ( talk) 14:51, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Amador Valley High School.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:Amador Valley High School.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Xiphos ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Orphaned, near duplicate of File:Amador Valley and Pleasanton Ridge.jpg. The only difference is straightening and a slight crop. ✗ plicit 11:00, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Phillip Jablonski mug shot.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Relicensed per commons tag, No local objections expressed. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 10:20, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:Phillip Jablonski mug shot.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Momoricks ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Booking photo by Californian govt entity, Why is this under NFCC when the Commons one is under a PD-CAGov style licence? ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 12:16, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Photo of Caroline Emily Nevill.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:25, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:Photo of Caroline Emily Nevill.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by WomenArtistUpdates ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Notwithstanding the NPG copyright claim, this is an old image. Why is it under NFCC, when the commons version is PD? ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 12:18, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Photo of Elizabeth Pulman.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:25, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:Photo of Elizabeth Pulman.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by WomenArtistUpdates ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Commons equivalent is apparently PD. Why is the local copy under NFCC? ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 12:18, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Planned Parenthood logo.svg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:25, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:Planned Parenthood logo.svg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Armbrust ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Other than the stylized leaves/ P (left), why is this under NFCC, when the equivalent image on Commons is considered "simple"? ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 12:20, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Princeton Univ seal.svg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn/Deleted as F8 , A file from Commons with the same name is now visible. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 10:33, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:Princeton Univ seal.svg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jamil.V.Estorninos ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Considered to be a PD design at Commons c:File:Princeton seal.svg, why under NFCC locally? ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 12:37, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Quality-Control Logo2.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:25, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:Quality-Control Logo2.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bandittx ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Other than the gradient, this is a text logo- ( c:File:Quality-Control Music logo.jpg is considered simple.) ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 12:49, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Rachel Barrett - Suffragette.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:Rachel Barrett - Suffragette.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by FruitMonkey ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Attributed to Lena Connell (1875-1949), so PD in UK. Why under NFCC? ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 12:53, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Radisson Blu logo.svg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn/Deleted as F8 , A file from Commons with the same name is now visible. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 10:34, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:Radisson Blu logo.svg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Benstown ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Text logo , free at Commons c:File:Radisson Blu logo.svg ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 12:53, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Radyo5 its fresh.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: No action. Currently nominated for DR at Commons, we can revisit this matter if the Commons file is kept - FASTILY 03:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:Radyo5 its fresh.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by 718 Bot ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Text logo - free at Commons c:File:Radyo5 its fresh logo.png but unsourced. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 12:55, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:TheGroup!.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:TheGroup!.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Allangauld ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Orphan, unclear subject, blurry. May be a screen capture. --- Possibly ☎ 13:19, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Rebellion Developments logo.svg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: No action. Currently nominated for DR at Commons, we can revisit this matter if the Commons file is kept - FASTILY 03:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:Rebellion Developments logo.svg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by IceWelder ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
c:File:Rebellion Developments logo.svg is considered a text-logo. Is it is because it's above UK TOO that it's under NFCC here? ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 13:42, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- ShakespeareFan00, the rationale on Commons is obviously incorrect with the user claiming to be the author. The UK TOO is incredibly low, so I nominated the Commons version for deletion. The non-free version here should be kept. IceWelder [ ✉] 12:38, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Robotmonster.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:10, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:Robotmonster.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Philbertgray ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Common claims this poster art as PD by virture of no notice. Why under NFCC locally? ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 17:00, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Serbian Party Oathkeepers logo.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: No action. Currently nominated for DR at Commons, we can revisit this matter if the Commons file is kept - FASTILY 03:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:Serbian Party Oathkeepers logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Elserbio00 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Commons considered this a simple logo, Other than the circular elements there is only text forming this. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 18:43, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:SkyWayLogo.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: No action. Currently nominated for DR at Commons, we can revisit this matter if the Commons file is kept - FASTILY 03:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:SkyWayLogo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Begoon ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Other than the gradient on the S/W, I am seeing a text logo. Why under NFCC? ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 18:59, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Social Democratic Party of Finland logo.svg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:06, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:Social Democratic Party of Finland logo.svg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Pudeo ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Commons c:File:Sozialdemokratische Partei Finnlands Logo.svg considers this a simple logo. Why is it under NFCC locally? ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 19:09, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Squares crisps designs.jpeg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Textbook WP:NFCC#8 violation. No prejudice to restoration if the article is significantly expanded to explicitly discuss this image in-depth - FASTILY 03:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:Squares crisps designs.jpeg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sahaib3005 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
This non-free collage of product packages is being used to "show all the different logos and designs of Squares", but there is no significant sourced commentary about any of the iterations of packaging and/or logos. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Whpq ( talk) 21:10, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
User:Whpq, I apologise for not adding commentary before, it is mentioned throughout the article. I have added a caption that reads: "Old packets of Squares from left to right: Square Crisps (1980s to 1990s), Square (1990s to early 2000s), Squares (late 2000s) and Squares (late 2000s to 2019)". If that is not enough, then I can add more commentary. Please don’t delete it. Sahaib3005 ( talk) 21:22, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
User:Whpq, I have added a whole section about the design of the packaging. If that is not enough, I don’t know what is. Can you remove your deletion request now? Sahaib3005 ( talk) 20:23, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
User:Whpq, I see that you have made edits after I made my previous comment. So either you’re purposely ignoring me or you didn’t see it. I just want you look at the new changes I made to Squares (crisps). Thanks. Sahaib3005 ( talk) 09:35, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- @ Sahaib3005: It's rather rude to demand that I immediately review your work. I will look at tings in due time. This discussion is open for a minimum of 7 days. -- Whpq ( talk) 11:02, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- @ Sahaib3005: The section you added is sourced to Pinterest, Youtube, and stock photos. That's not the sort of sourcing that is needed. -- Whpq ( talk) 16:00, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Twelve O'clock High Gregory Peck.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Textbook WP:NFCC#8 violation. No prejudice to restoration if the article is significantly expanded to explicitly discuss this image in-depth - FASTILY 03:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:Twelve O'clock High Gregory Peck.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Beyond My Ken ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
The screenshot is used in the plot section of Twelve O'Clock High against WP:FILMNFI in that the plot section describes the film and is not critical commentary of the image itself. The fair use rationale states its purpose is "The image is being used to illustrate an article about the film depicted in the image." The image fails WP:NFCC#3a since the poster already illustrates the article and there is no critical commentary of the image itself in the article, it does nothing to increase the reader's understanding of the film and its exclusion is not detrimental to the understanding of the film, thereby failing WP:NFCC#8. Aspects ( talk) 23:50, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- The image is not a screenshot, it is a publicity shot with no indication of copyright. It illustrates Gregory Peck as the character he plays in the film, which is inherently illustrative of the film. Images do not have to be connected to the section in which they appear, but to the article as a whole. Yet another example of Aspects personal crusade to eliminate as many images as possible from Wikipedia, and minimize as small as possible those he allows to remain. These edits are detrimental to the usefulness of the encyclopedia. Beyond My Ken ( talk) 20:57, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
- You uploaded the file thirteen years ago with the licensing stating that the file is a screenshot, so it seems convenient that when someone holds it to that standard, you claim the fair use rationale is incorrect, which if true you could have fixed it for years and the rationale still states it is a screenshot after this comment. Fair use files do have to be connected to the sections they are used in and need to have critical commentary for them to pass WP:NFCC. In all of these files for discussion that I have brought about files you have uploaded, you have never once addressed the critical commentary that is necessary for these screenshots to pass WP:NFCC, which is why the discussions have been closed as delete. In the future, I would advise you to not discuss other editors' actions in files for discussion and my edits are not "detrimental to the usefulness of the encyclopedia" since the the screenshots lack critical commentary to pass WP:NFCC and nothing in this comment shows how the file passes WP:NFCC#3a or WP:NFCC#8. Aspects ( talk) 22:57, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Twelve O'clock High.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Textbook WP:NFCC#8 violation. No prejudice to restoration if the article is significantly expanded to explicitly discuss this image in-depth - FASTILY 03:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:Twelve O'clock High.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Beyond My Ken ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
The screenshot is used in the Cast section of A Matter of Life and Death (film). The fair use rationale states its purpose is "The image is being used to illustrate an article about the film depicted in the image." The image fails WP:NFCC#3a since the poster already illustrates the article and there is no critical commentary of the image itself, it does nothing to increase the reader's understanding of the film and its exclusion is not detrimental to the understanding of the film, thereby failing WP:NFCC#8. Aspects ( talk) 23:52, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- The image shows major characters as they appear in the film, which is inherently illustrative of the film. The rationale clearly spells out the usefulness of the image to the film, and it is not duplicate of the poster. Yet another example of Aspects' personal crusade to eliminate as many images as possible from Wikipedia, and minimize as small as possible those he allows to remain. These edits are detrimental to the usefulness of the encyclopedia. Beyond My Ken ( talk) 21:00, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
- Readers do not need to see the cast of a film in character or in relationship to each other to understand the film. If so, every film would have a screenshot. I quoted what the fair use rationale states so there is nothing that "clearly spells out the usefulness of the image in the film". I never stated that the screenshot was a duplicate for the poster, but that if the screenshot it illustrating the film, that the poster already does that, thereby failing WP:NFCC. In all of these files for discussion that I have brought about files you have uploaded, you have never once addressed the critical commentary that is necessary for these screenshots to pass WP:NFCC, which is why the discussions have been closed as delete. In the future, I would advise you to not discuss other editors' actions in files for discussion and my edits are not "detrimental to the usefulness of the encyclopedia" since the the screenshots lack critical commentary to pass WP:NFCC and nothing in this comment shows how the file passes WP:NFCC#3a or WP:NFCC#8. Aspects ( talk) 22:57, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.