The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 7 July 2020 (UTC) reply

File:A-tuned-Mitsubishi-Eclipse-(2G).jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Solitude ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused image, don't see how it could be useful. - Rich ^{T| C| E-Mail} 02:07, 27 June 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat ( talk) 04:51, 28 June 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep and transfer to Commons. This is a freely licensed photo of a Mitsubishi Eclipse. It is obviously usable for Eclipse related material even if editorially, we have chosen to use other images. It would certainly be acceptable for Commons so we should transfer it. -- Whpq ( talk) 19:55, 29 June 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 5 July 2020 (UTC) reply

File:A.L. Pansini.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by RichardCacioppo ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused file. Limited usefulness - Rich ^{T| C| E-Mail} 02:08, 27 June 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat ( talk) 04:51, 28 June 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. —  JJMC89 ( T· C) 04:48, 7 September 2020 (UTC) reply

File:Black Mirror - Playtest (Black Mirror).jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Hyliad ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Fails WP:NFCC#8: not used for critical commentary or educational value but purely for decoration in an infobox. Presence of this image does not enhance understanding enough to warrant inclusion of non-free media. ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 06:09, 9 March 2020 (UTC) reply

• Keep: Justin has nominated this as part of a series of FFDs on Black Mirror images made with no previous discussion or notification. They should have been discussed en masse first, rather than aggressively nominated in a spammy bot-like fashion. Justin is wrong to nominate the images for deletion as they satisfy NFCC#8: the captions provide critical commentary and the images are necessary for depicting either the world or the main character(s) of an episode; further justification is given on each non-free use rationale, on several talk pages and in several GA and FA reviews. Justin also attempts to supervote here by ignoring consensus established in many GA and FA reviews, where non-free rationales have been checked by each editor who passed an article. Additionally, many individual images have specific extra reasons why they are necessary to understand a feature of the episode. I am happy to discuss any individual images on a case-by-case basis, but not to engage any further in this spam-like busywork. — Bilorv ( talk) 07:16, 9 March 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete Clearly this episode engaged in use of CGI and if there was more discussion on how CGI was used to build out the episode, there could be an image used to show that (and I'm awre that Inside Black Mirror doesn't give a lot on this side). There may be other possible shots, too based on what's already sourced,but this one shot is not discussed at all, so is deleteable. -- Masem ( t) 13:58, 9 March 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep clearly a key moment in the episode which cannot be recreated and fulfils the rationale. The Rambling Man ( Staying alive since 2005!) 21:14, 9 March 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete I don't see how this image matches up with anything in the plot section of the article. Is this the mole he was supposed to whack? It's not clear. A non-free image of the "mushroom" would be much more appropriate, as that's discussed at length. The Squirrel Conspiracy ( talk) 19:01, 3 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete - stated purpose is for a key moment in the episode yet there is no sourced commentary about how this is a key moment. Fails WP:NFCC#8. -- Whpq ( talk) 19:51, 29 June 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete - per MOS:TVIMAGE which states that a screenshot should only be used in infoboxes "if it is required to illustrate the object of explicit, sourced analytical commentary, and where that commentary is in need of a visual support to be understood." But there is not any explicit, sourced commentary about this scene in the article.  ★  Bigr Tex 02:31, 17 July 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.