From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 23

File:Walter Oesau.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was:  Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 May 31#File:Walter Oesau.jpg. xplicit 00:25, 31 May 2017 (UTC) reply

File:Walter Oesau.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Abel29a ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

A non-free image in an article that also contains a free & properly licensed pencil portrait File:Walter_Oesau_Portrait.png -- I suggest using it instead. The image in question is fairly generic and its omission would not be detrimental to understanding. K.e.coffman ( talk) 00:26, 23 May 2017 (UTC) reply

  • Keep - A sketch portrait is not similar to the authentic photograph. Rather the pencil sketch should be used in the body article as it doesn't look good as the infobox image. The photo truly identifies the person in question, and a free substitute is not adequate to identify the person. Such omission would prompt others into searching for an authentic photo of this person and trying to upload it as non-free. BTW, I tagged the image as PD in EU areas as the image was anonymous created, and the subject of the photo died in 1944, i.e. 73 years ago. However, the image may still be copyrightable in the US per URAA. -- George Ho ( talk) 02:38, 23 May 2017 (UTC) reply
My bad. I must have overlooked some parts of Flickr description. -- George Ho ( talk) 23:47, 23 May 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Faded Restrung.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. czar 07:52, 31 May 2017 (UTC) reply

File:Faded Restrung.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Hayman30 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

I originally tagged this alternate single cover with {{ di-disputed fair use rationale}} with: "Violates WP:NFG. Additionally, fails to meet points three and eight of WP:NFCC. This cover is not significantly different from the main one to justify its inclusion." It was originally used in a non-free gallery. It was then moved to the infobox and the deletion tag was removed by the uploader, using the edit summary: "Issue resolved, moved image back to infobox. This is indeed significantly different from the main one". Although the first half of the concern was addressed, the second half was not. The difference of the alternate cover from the main cover is miniscule that this second cover is not needed ( WP:NFCC#3) and is not subject to critical commentary ( WP:NFCC#8). Its use does not increase the readers' understanding of the article, nor would its removal be detrimental to that understanding. xplicit 00:51, 23 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fouta.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:04, 31 May 2017 (UTC) reply

File:Fouta.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Australian Matt ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused non-free image, no possibility of fair use as a free alternative could be found or created at any time. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 13:02, 23 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BondAndJaws.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:04, 31 May 2017 (UTC) reply

File:BondAndJaws.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ultraviolet scissor flame ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

non-free screenshot used just to decorate a characters list. damiens.rf 16:05, 23 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:White House cemetery war cross crop.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:04, 31 May 2017 (UTC) reply

File:White House cemetery war cross crop.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Redvers ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Delete - unused local copy of Commons:File:White House cemetery war cross.jpg. Marked with {{ keep local}} but uploader has been absent since 2010. Kelly hi! 20:51, 23 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Opal card logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Remain non free. The letter 'O' in the logo is said to be original enogh for the purpose of copyright (non-admin closure) Yashovardhan ( talk) 21:02, 30 May 2017 (UTC) reply

File:Opal card logo.svg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bidgee ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

May not be copyrighted at least in the US Flow 234 (Nina) talk 23:41, 23 May 2017 (UTC) reply

(EC) Comment: I'm not sure if the O is a simple shape (to be {{ PD-shape}}), since I think it has a somewhat complex design to create the shape of the O. In Australia, it is copyrighted (see: Commons:Threshold of originality#Australia (so can't be hosted on Commons). Bidgee ( talk) 01:24, 24 May 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2NE1 Falling in Love cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: convert to fair use. Pretty clear-cut case. xplicit 00:24, 24 May 2017 (UTC) reply

File:2NE1 Falling in Love cover.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Might not be Public Domain in the United States Flow 234 (Nina) talk 23:48, 23 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 23

File:Walter Oesau.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was:  Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 May 31#File:Walter Oesau.jpg. xplicit 00:25, 31 May 2017 (UTC) reply

File:Walter Oesau.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Abel29a ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

A non-free image in an article that also contains a free & properly licensed pencil portrait File:Walter_Oesau_Portrait.png -- I suggest using it instead. The image in question is fairly generic and its omission would not be detrimental to understanding. K.e.coffman ( talk) 00:26, 23 May 2017 (UTC) reply

  • Keep - A sketch portrait is not similar to the authentic photograph. Rather the pencil sketch should be used in the body article as it doesn't look good as the infobox image. The photo truly identifies the person in question, and a free substitute is not adequate to identify the person. Such omission would prompt others into searching for an authentic photo of this person and trying to upload it as non-free. BTW, I tagged the image as PD in EU areas as the image was anonymous created, and the subject of the photo died in 1944, i.e. 73 years ago. However, the image may still be copyrightable in the US per URAA. -- George Ho ( talk) 02:38, 23 May 2017 (UTC) reply
My bad. I must have overlooked some parts of Flickr description. -- George Ho ( talk) 23:47, 23 May 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Faded Restrung.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. czar 07:52, 31 May 2017 (UTC) reply

File:Faded Restrung.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Hayman30 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

I originally tagged this alternate single cover with {{ di-disputed fair use rationale}} with: "Violates WP:NFG. Additionally, fails to meet points three and eight of WP:NFCC. This cover is not significantly different from the main one to justify its inclusion." It was originally used in a non-free gallery. It was then moved to the infobox and the deletion tag was removed by the uploader, using the edit summary: "Issue resolved, moved image back to infobox. This is indeed significantly different from the main one". Although the first half of the concern was addressed, the second half was not. The difference of the alternate cover from the main cover is miniscule that this second cover is not needed ( WP:NFCC#3) and is not subject to critical commentary ( WP:NFCC#8). Its use does not increase the readers' understanding of the article, nor would its removal be detrimental to that understanding. xplicit 00:51, 23 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fouta.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:04, 31 May 2017 (UTC) reply

File:Fouta.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Australian Matt ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused non-free image, no possibility of fair use as a free alternative could be found or created at any time. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 13:02, 23 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BondAndJaws.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:04, 31 May 2017 (UTC) reply

File:BondAndJaws.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ultraviolet scissor flame ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

non-free screenshot used just to decorate a characters list. damiens.rf 16:05, 23 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:White House cemetery war cross crop.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:04, 31 May 2017 (UTC) reply

File:White House cemetery war cross crop.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Redvers ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Delete - unused local copy of Commons:File:White House cemetery war cross.jpg. Marked with {{ keep local}} but uploader has been absent since 2010. Kelly hi! 20:51, 23 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Opal card logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Remain non free. The letter 'O' in the logo is said to be original enogh for the purpose of copyright (non-admin closure) Yashovardhan ( talk) 21:02, 30 May 2017 (UTC) reply

File:Opal card logo.svg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bidgee ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

May not be copyrighted at least in the US Flow 234 (Nina) talk 23:41, 23 May 2017 (UTC) reply

(EC) Comment: I'm not sure if the O is a simple shape (to be {{ PD-shape}}), since I think it has a somewhat complex design to create the shape of the O. In Australia, it is copyrighted (see: Commons:Threshold of originality#Australia (so can't be hosted on Commons). Bidgee ( talk) 01:24, 24 May 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2NE1 Falling in Love cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: convert to fair use. Pretty clear-cut case. xplicit 00:24, 24 May 2017 (UTC) reply

File:2NE1 Falling in Love cover.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Might not be Public Domain in the United States Flow 234 (Nina) talk 23:48, 23 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook