The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 06:05, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. Described as "an artist's impression of...". Seems to indicate the work itself is made by someone else. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:43, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Czar ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. This uploader contributed many images all at once for use on Rameshwar Dockyard. They seem to be from different time periods and with different cameras. Highly likely to be copyright violations. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:44, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 06:40, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. This uploader contributed many images all at once for use on Rameshwar Dockyard. They seem to be from different time periods and with different cameras. Highly likely to be copyright violations. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:44, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Czar ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. This uploader contributed many images all at once for use on Rameshwar Dockyard. They seem to be from different time periods and with different cameras. Highly likely to be copyright violations. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Czar ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. This uploader contributed many images all at once for use on Rameshwar Dockyard. They seem to be from different time periods and with different cameras. Highly likely to be copyright violations. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 06:06, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. This uploader contributed many images all at once for use on Rameshwar Dockyard. They seem to be from different time periods and with different cameras. Highly likely to be copyright violations. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Czar ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. This uploader contributed many images all at once for use on Rameshwar Dockyard. They seem to be from different time periods and with different cameras. Highly likely to be copyright violations. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Czar ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. This uploader contributed many images all at once for use on Rameshwar Dockyard. They seem to be from different time periods and with different cameras. Highly likely to be copyright violations. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 06:02, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. This uploader contributed many images all at once for use on Rameshwar Dockyard. They seem to be from different time periods and with different cameras. Highly likely to be copyright violations. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 06:02, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. This uploader contributed many images all at once for use on Rameshwar Dockyard. They seem to be from different time periods and with different cameras. Highly likely to be copyright violations. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 06:02, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. This uploader contributed many images all at once for use on Rameshwar Dockyard. They seem to be from different time periods and with different cameras. Highly likely to be copyright violations. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 06:02, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. This uploader contributed many images all at once for use on Rameshwar Dockyard. They seem to be from different time periods and with different cameras. Highly likely to be copyright violations. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 06:02, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. This uploader contributed many images all at once for use on Rameshwar Dockyard. They seem to be from different time periods and with different cameras. Highly likely to be copyright violations. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 06:02, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. This uploader contributed many images all at once for use on Rameshwar Dockyard. They seem to be from different time periods and with different cameras. Highly likely to be copyright violations. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 06:02, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. This uploader contributed many images all at once for use on Rameshwar Dockyard. They seem to be from different time periods and with different cameras. Highly likely to be copyright violations. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:46, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 06:40, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. This uploader contributed many images all at once for use on a couple articles. They seem to be from different time periods and with different cameras. Highly likely to be copyright violations. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:46, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 06:00, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. This uploader contributed many images all at once for use on a couple articles. They seem to be from different time periods and with different cameras. Highly likely to be copyright violations. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:47, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 05:58, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Another dubious upload from that same user. Small resolution and varied photos makes this a likely violation. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:55, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 05:58, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Another dubious upload from that same user. Small resolution and varied photos makes this a likely violation. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:56, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 06:39, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
NEU. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 07:52, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Keep Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 10:20, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
NEU. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 07:52, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Convert to non-free and put in the article Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 10:21, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Clearly a title card, so not necessarily self work as claimed. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 08:37, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by BU Rob13 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
NC Gov terms linked seem to be non-commerical terms. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 08:57, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Primefac ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned Public Domain file. This version is no longer accepted by the University of Notre Dame and this file is the only accepted version of the Latin seal seal per the university's Public Affairs website. Corkythe hornetfan (ping me) 18:20, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: move to Commons czar 06:41, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
This was tagged as "keep local", originally with another template indicating the author did not know if this was PD in the source country. We now know it's PD worldwide based on the date of death of the author, so the original reason not to move to Commons no longer applies. This should be moved to Commons and deleted, which must go through FFD due to the "keep local" template. ~ Rob13 Talk 20:13, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete Mz7 ( talk) 20:24, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Derivative of non-free work. No FOP in the United States for 3D art. ~ Rob13 Talk 20:20, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 February 10#File:1924Stanfordcoaches.jpg}}
The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 February 10#File:1927NYYankees5.jpg}}
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:05, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Derivative of non-free content (there is no FOP in the USA for 3D works) FASTILY 22:00, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 06:48, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
unused personal image, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 23:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 05:41, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
unused personal image, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 23:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 06:05, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. Described as "an artist's impression of...". Seems to indicate the work itself is made by someone else. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:43, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Czar ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. This uploader contributed many images all at once for use on Rameshwar Dockyard. They seem to be from different time periods and with different cameras. Highly likely to be copyright violations. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:44, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 06:40, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. This uploader contributed many images all at once for use on Rameshwar Dockyard. They seem to be from different time periods and with different cameras. Highly likely to be copyright violations. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:44, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Czar ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. This uploader contributed many images all at once for use on Rameshwar Dockyard. They seem to be from different time periods and with different cameras. Highly likely to be copyright violations. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Czar ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. This uploader contributed many images all at once for use on Rameshwar Dockyard. They seem to be from different time periods and with different cameras. Highly likely to be copyright violations. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 06:06, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. This uploader contributed many images all at once for use on Rameshwar Dockyard. They seem to be from different time periods and with different cameras. Highly likely to be copyright violations. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Czar ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. This uploader contributed many images all at once for use on Rameshwar Dockyard. They seem to be from different time periods and with different cameras. Highly likely to be copyright violations. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Czar ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. This uploader contributed many images all at once for use on Rameshwar Dockyard. They seem to be from different time periods and with different cameras. Highly likely to be copyright violations. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 06:02, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. This uploader contributed many images all at once for use on Rameshwar Dockyard. They seem to be from different time periods and with different cameras. Highly likely to be copyright violations. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 06:02, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. This uploader contributed many images all at once for use on Rameshwar Dockyard. They seem to be from different time periods and with different cameras. Highly likely to be copyright violations. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 06:02, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. This uploader contributed many images all at once for use on Rameshwar Dockyard. They seem to be from different time periods and with different cameras. Highly likely to be copyright violations. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 06:02, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. This uploader contributed many images all at once for use on Rameshwar Dockyard. They seem to be from different time periods and with different cameras. Highly likely to be copyright violations. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 06:02, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. This uploader contributed many images all at once for use on Rameshwar Dockyard. They seem to be from different time periods and with different cameras. Highly likely to be copyright violations. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 06:02, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. This uploader contributed many images all at once for use on Rameshwar Dockyard. They seem to be from different time periods and with different cameras. Highly likely to be copyright violations. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 06:02, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. This uploader contributed many images all at once for use on Rameshwar Dockyard. They seem to be from different time periods and with different cameras. Highly likely to be copyright violations. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:46, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 06:40, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. This uploader contributed many images all at once for use on a couple articles. They seem to be from different time periods and with different cameras. Highly likely to be copyright violations. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:46, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 06:00, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. This uploader contributed many images all at once for use on a couple articles. They seem to be from different time periods and with different cameras. Highly likely to be copyright violations. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:47, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 05:58, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Another dubious upload from that same user. Small resolution and varied photos makes this a likely violation. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:55, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 05:58, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Another dubious upload from that same user. Small resolution and varied photos makes this a likely violation. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:56, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 06:39, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
NEU. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 07:52, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Keep Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 10:20, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
NEU. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 07:52, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Convert to non-free and put in the article Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 10:21, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Clearly a title card, so not necessarily self work as claimed. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 08:37, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by BU Rob13 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
NC Gov terms linked seem to be non-commerical terms. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 08:57, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Primefac ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned Public Domain file. This version is no longer accepted by the University of Notre Dame and this file is the only accepted version of the Latin seal seal per the university's Public Affairs website. Corkythe hornetfan (ping me) 18:20, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: move to Commons czar 06:41, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
This was tagged as "keep local", originally with another template indicating the author did not know if this was PD in the source country. We now know it's PD worldwide based on the date of death of the author, so the original reason not to move to Commons no longer applies. This should be moved to Commons and deleted, which must go through FFD due to the "keep local" template. ~ Rob13 Talk 20:13, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete Mz7 ( talk) 20:24, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Derivative of non-free work. No FOP in the United States for 3D art. ~ Rob13 Talk 20:20, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 February 10#File:1924Stanfordcoaches.jpg}}
The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 February 10#File:1927NYYankees5.jpg}}
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:05, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Derivative of non-free content (there is no FOP in the USA for 3D works) FASTILY 22:00, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 06:48, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
unused personal image, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 23:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 05:41, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
unused personal image, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 23:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)