The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:09, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Accidentally uploaded the wrong way. Billboard Man ( talk) 15:18, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: procedural close. No action required here. Ricky81682 is welcome to replace the Jesuit logo on the articles discussed below with more relevant logos as he sees appropriate, following the guideline Wikipedia:Logos. Deryck C. 21:25, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
This is a follow-up from the dispute at the COI noticeboard where it is not relevant. I'm going to create separate subheaders for the actual pages where the usage is still there and in question. This may either be handled here or possibly at each page's talk but I think this is preferable, definitely over the COI noticeboard handling it. Most of the pages seem to have them removed. Ricky81682 ( talk) 02:20, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The complaint seems to be that the logo has been used "promotionally". Idk about that, but even if it was, it would be a content dispute, with nothing to do with the logo as such, even if the file was hosted here. The logo was designed in 1541 and is of undeniable notability, and is just as undeniably not coverred by copyright, so there is simply nothing to discuss in terms of the image file. Don't drag content disputes into "for deletion" pages, it's an abuse of process. -- dab (𒁳) 09:51, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
This seems to be a local Jesuit Outreach and seems like it's basically the same as their actual logo but it's possible to replace this with the specific logo for the program. -- Ricky81682 ( talk) 02:26, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Their website here here seems to have a different logo so I'm not sure about using the full Jesuit logo for this group. -- Ricky81682 ( talk) 02:26, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The website link is a PDF and I can't find the actual logo. - Ricky81682 ( talk) 02:26, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Self-promotion, file is not in use and probably won't have an encyclopedic use in the future. Sunmist3 ( talk) 08:17, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Self-promotion, file is not in use and probably won't have an encyclopedic use in the future. Sunmist3 ( talk) 08:22, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Self-promotion, file is not in use and probably won't have an encyclopedic use in the future. Sunmist3 ( talk) 08:22, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Self-promotion, file is not in use and probably won't have an encyclopedic use in the future. Sunmist3 ( talk) 08:23, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: keep. In the absence of further rebuttal, Harrygouvas's PD rationale is accepted AGF. The file description page is updated to reflect this. Deryck C. 21:32, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
The license statement says The unknown photographer died on 1930-1940
but the information template says UNKNOWN PHOTOGRAPHER
. How do we know it's PD then?
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk,
contributions) 09:45, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
ANSWER: Thank you for your discussion. The answer to your question is this. The period 1925-1940 there was ONLY One photographer in Preveza. Nikolaos Thomaides, who came here from Turkey (Νικόλαος Θωμαίδης (1875-1942): The photographer of Kemal Ataturk). The dress style of women in the photo is about 1930. So 99,9999 % the photographer is Nikolaos Thomaides. (2016-1942= 74, So thephoto is public domain). In the same period (1930) we have photos ONLY from the famous photographer from Athens Spyros Melentzis. All his photos have published by Benakis Museum in a Photo Album. This photo does not exist in this Album. So Propably the photo belongs to Nikolaos Thomaides. Again thank you Sit. Dr. Harry Gouvas, MD, PhD Harrygouvas ( talk) 17:24, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Relicense Majora ( talk) 04:03, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
This file is marked as "fair use", but unless the label was unpublished (which sounds unlikely) it seems like it may qualify as {{ PD-US-no notice}} instead in light of the lack of a copyright mark. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 10:25, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:44, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
This is a seal of a Floridian city (see e.g http://www.plantcitygov.com/DocumentCenter/View/19194) and thus falls under the scope of {{ PD-FloridaGov}} rather than {{ Non-free logo}}. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 10:28, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Revisions attributed to other person deleted Majora ( talk) 04:14, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
The current revision of this file is attributed to weedthebestherb
, and I don't see evidence that this is the same person as the uploader. The 2nd version is fine though, per EXIF checking.
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk,
contributions) 11:39, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Oshwah ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
This file has two small versions, each of dubious copyright status:
Photograph by Bekah Groves Model: Mandy Groves. User:Lola-sama indicates that they are called Mandy Groves, but it's not clear if she's the subject or the photographer.
photo by Salman Ehsan Graphican also used in www.uchsharif.combut User:Ashraf 03006372488 says "Ashraf ali" and "Ashraf Kaleem Sagar". Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 12:10, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 September 12#File:Harland_Sanders.jpg}}
The result of the discussion was: no consensus for deletion. Mini apolis 22:44, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
Uploader is releasing this as public domain but it is a derivative work from a copyrighted Honda brochure ( http://hondanews.ca/Content/hondanews.ca/d6f7e22e-e62f-43de-8221-bf62f2da4aa3/Brochure/2006HondaRidgeline.doc). Although the uploader acknowledges the source, that does not negate the fact that this is a derivative work for which he does not hold the original copyright. I don't know if this makes it eligible for G4 speedy deletion, but this conversation has been had before. See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2016 January 28#File:Drawing of Honda Ridgeline Frame.svg. Whpq ( talk) 12:44, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete all revisions ★ Bigr Tex 20:30, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
The second file revision is clearly copied from http://www.glamsham.com/download/hd-images/hrithik-roshan-hd-pictures/bollywood-actors/8/12/index.htm which doesn't show a free license. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 13:16, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
The second revision of this file exists already at File:Jack Buchanan (15054935160).jpg and should be deleted under WP:CSD#F8. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 13:27, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. Deryck C. 21:50, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
This file has no copyright license or origin, and the prior version already exists at File:Whitesnake Forevermore.jpg. Will message the uploader of the second file, but if they don't have information on license and origin this should be deleted. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 13:34, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Uploaded is claiming to be an of the production company and that this pr photo is being released under a free license however we would need OTRS confirmation Whpq ( talk) 13:45, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: no quorum, permission granted to nominator-admin Jo-Jo Eumerus to do whatever she sees fit with this file. Deryck C. 21:54, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
This file currently contains two revisions:
They need to be split in some way. Also pinging Stefan2 because they tagged the Commons file as "wrong license". Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 14:02, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
This appears to be a picture of the uploader and doesn't seem to be a selfie. No evidence of permission from the photographer. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:32, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:34, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete ★ Bigr Tex 20:35, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Possibly PD because of age, but no verifiable source has been provided. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:35, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:36, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:37, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:38, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:38, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:39, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:39, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Relicense Majora ( talk) 22:31, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Possibly pre-1923, but the article is unclear. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:41, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Hammacher begins its "gnome" campaign - an ad campaign that features diligent little cartoon characters in the pages of its catalogs.dated 1920. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 16:46, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:41, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:42, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:43, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete ★ Bigr Tex 20:45, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Two copies of the same file with different copyright tags. I can't read the text on the source website, but I can't find any mention of Creative Commons on the linked page. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 16:57, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
Appears to be pictures (and text) about a non-notable person. Not currently used in any en-wp page (and unlikely to be used). DexDor (talk) 17:23, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Keep as non-free Majora ( talk) 00:18, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
This is claimed to be unfree. If this is the case, then it violates WP:NFCC#9 on the page Template:PD-USGov-DOE-ANL. However, that page states that all works by Argonne National Laboratory are works by the United States Government. If this is the case (I can't figure out how the laboratory is organised), then there's a fair chance that the laboratory's logo also is a work by the United States Government. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:20, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Documents authored by Argonne National Laboratory employees are the result of work under U.S. Government contract DE-AC02-06CH11357 and are therefore subject to the following license: The Government is granted for itself and others acting on its behalf a paid-up, nonexclusive, irrevocable worldwide license in these documents to reproduce, prepare derivative works, and perform publicly and display publicly by or on behalf of the Government., which seems to exclude third parties, i.e unfree. Contractor work, not government work, so to speak. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 20:36, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Keep only in infobox of ASEAN Football Federation ★ Bigr Tex 20:59, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
This fails WP:NFCC#10c in ASEAN Football Federation as the FUR doesn't reveal which one of the file's uses the FUR refers to or what purpose the image serves.
Additionally, the file fails WP:NFCC#8 at several places in the article. It should only be used in the infobox but not at dozens of places in tables. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:35, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:FREER. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:23, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:06, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8 in List of Wii U software and WP:NFCC#9 in Talk:List of Wii U software. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:37, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8 and WP:FREER. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:39, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
See c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wiki02CinoFront1965.jpg. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:54, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:09, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Accidentally uploaded the wrong way. Billboard Man ( talk) 15:18, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: procedural close. No action required here. Ricky81682 is welcome to replace the Jesuit logo on the articles discussed below with more relevant logos as he sees appropriate, following the guideline Wikipedia:Logos. Deryck C. 21:25, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
This is a follow-up from the dispute at the COI noticeboard where it is not relevant. I'm going to create separate subheaders for the actual pages where the usage is still there and in question. This may either be handled here or possibly at each page's talk but I think this is preferable, definitely over the COI noticeboard handling it. Most of the pages seem to have them removed. Ricky81682 ( talk) 02:20, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The complaint seems to be that the logo has been used "promotionally". Idk about that, but even if it was, it would be a content dispute, with nothing to do with the logo as such, even if the file was hosted here. The logo was designed in 1541 and is of undeniable notability, and is just as undeniably not coverred by copyright, so there is simply nothing to discuss in terms of the image file. Don't drag content disputes into "for deletion" pages, it's an abuse of process. -- dab (𒁳) 09:51, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
This seems to be a local Jesuit Outreach and seems like it's basically the same as their actual logo but it's possible to replace this with the specific logo for the program. -- Ricky81682 ( talk) 02:26, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Their website here here seems to have a different logo so I'm not sure about using the full Jesuit logo for this group. -- Ricky81682 ( talk) 02:26, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The website link is a PDF and I can't find the actual logo. - Ricky81682 ( talk) 02:26, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Self-promotion, file is not in use and probably won't have an encyclopedic use in the future. Sunmist3 ( talk) 08:17, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Self-promotion, file is not in use and probably won't have an encyclopedic use in the future. Sunmist3 ( talk) 08:22, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Self-promotion, file is not in use and probably won't have an encyclopedic use in the future. Sunmist3 ( talk) 08:22, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Self-promotion, file is not in use and probably won't have an encyclopedic use in the future. Sunmist3 ( talk) 08:23, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: keep. In the absence of further rebuttal, Harrygouvas's PD rationale is accepted AGF. The file description page is updated to reflect this. Deryck C. 21:32, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
The license statement says The unknown photographer died on 1930-1940
but the information template says UNKNOWN PHOTOGRAPHER
. How do we know it's PD then?
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk,
contributions) 09:45, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
ANSWER: Thank you for your discussion. The answer to your question is this. The period 1925-1940 there was ONLY One photographer in Preveza. Nikolaos Thomaides, who came here from Turkey (Νικόλαος Θωμαίδης (1875-1942): The photographer of Kemal Ataturk). The dress style of women in the photo is about 1930. So 99,9999 % the photographer is Nikolaos Thomaides. (2016-1942= 74, So thephoto is public domain). In the same period (1930) we have photos ONLY from the famous photographer from Athens Spyros Melentzis. All his photos have published by Benakis Museum in a Photo Album. This photo does not exist in this Album. So Propably the photo belongs to Nikolaos Thomaides. Again thank you Sit. Dr. Harry Gouvas, MD, PhD Harrygouvas ( talk) 17:24, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Relicense Majora ( talk) 04:03, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
This file is marked as "fair use", but unless the label was unpublished (which sounds unlikely) it seems like it may qualify as {{ PD-US-no notice}} instead in light of the lack of a copyright mark. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 10:25, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:44, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
This is a seal of a Floridian city (see e.g http://www.plantcitygov.com/DocumentCenter/View/19194) and thus falls under the scope of {{ PD-FloridaGov}} rather than {{ Non-free logo}}. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 10:28, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Revisions attributed to other person deleted Majora ( talk) 04:14, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
The current revision of this file is attributed to weedthebestherb
, and I don't see evidence that this is the same person as the uploader. The 2nd version is fine though, per EXIF checking.
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk,
contributions) 11:39, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Oshwah ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
This file has two small versions, each of dubious copyright status:
Photograph by Bekah Groves Model: Mandy Groves. User:Lola-sama indicates that they are called Mandy Groves, but it's not clear if she's the subject or the photographer.
photo by Salman Ehsan Graphican also used in www.uchsharif.combut User:Ashraf 03006372488 says "Ashraf ali" and "Ashraf Kaleem Sagar". Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 12:10, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 September 12#File:Harland_Sanders.jpg}}
The result of the discussion was: no consensus for deletion. Mini apolis 22:44, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
Uploader is releasing this as public domain but it is a derivative work from a copyrighted Honda brochure ( http://hondanews.ca/Content/hondanews.ca/d6f7e22e-e62f-43de-8221-bf62f2da4aa3/Brochure/2006HondaRidgeline.doc). Although the uploader acknowledges the source, that does not negate the fact that this is a derivative work for which he does not hold the original copyright. I don't know if this makes it eligible for G4 speedy deletion, but this conversation has been had before. See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2016 January 28#File:Drawing of Honda Ridgeline Frame.svg. Whpq ( talk) 12:44, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete all revisions ★ Bigr Tex 20:30, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
The second file revision is clearly copied from http://www.glamsham.com/download/hd-images/hrithik-roshan-hd-pictures/bollywood-actors/8/12/index.htm which doesn't show a free license. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 13:16, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
The second revision of this file exists already at File:Jack Buchanan (15054935160).jpg and should be deleted under WP:CSD#F8. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 13:27, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. Deryck C. 21:50, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
This file has no copyright license or origin, and the prior version already exists at File:Whitesnake Forevermore.jpg. Will message the uploader of the second file, but if they don't have information on license and origin this should be deleted. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 13:34, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Uploaded is claiming to be an of the production company and that this pr photo is being released under a free license however we would need OTRS confirmation Whpq ( talk) 13:45, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: no quorum, permission granted to nominator-admin Jo-Jo Eumerus to do whatever she sees fit with this file. Deryck C. 21:54, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
This file currently contains two revisions:
They need to be split in some way. Also pinging Stefan2 because they tagged the Commons file as "wrong license". Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 14:02, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
This appears to be a picture of the uploader and doesn't seem to be a selfie. No evidence of permission from the photographer. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:32, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:34, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete ★ Bigr Tex 20:35, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Possibly PD because of age, but no verifiable source has been provided. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:35, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:36, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:37, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:38, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:38, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:39, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:39, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Relicense Majora ( talk) 22:31, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Possibly pre-1923, but the article is unclear. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:41, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Hammacher begins its "gnome" campaign - an ad campaign that features diligent little cartoon characters in the pages of its catalogs.dated 1920. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 16:46, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:41, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:42, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:43, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete ★ Bigr Tex 20:45, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Two copies of the same file with different copyright tags. I can't read the text on the source website, but I can't find any mention of Creative Commons on the linked page. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 16:57, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
Appears to be pictures (and text) about a non-notable person. Not currently used in any en-wp page (and unlikely to be used). DexDor (talk) 17:23, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Keep as non-free Majora ( talk) 00:18, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
This is claimed to be unfree. If this is the case, then it violates WP:NFCC#9 on the page Template:PD-USGov-DOE-ANL. However, that page states that all works by Argonne National Laboratory are works by the United States Government. If this is the case (I can't figure out how the laboratory is organised), then there's a fair chance that the laboratory's logo also is a work by the United States Government. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:20, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Documents authored by Argonne National Laboratory employees are the result of work under U.S. Government contract DE-AC02-06CH11357 and are therefore subject to the following license: The Government is granted for itself and others acting on its behalf a paid-up, nonexclusive, irrevocable worldwide license in these documents to reproduce, prepare derivative works, and perform publicly and display publicly by or on behalf of the Government., which seems to exclude third parties, i.e unfree. Contractor work, not government work, so to speak. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 20:36, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Keep only in infobox of ASEAN Football Federation ★ Bigr Tex 20:59, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
This fails WP:NFCC#10c in ASEAN Football Federation as the FUR doesn't reveal which one of the file's uses the FUR refers to or what purpose the image serves.
Additionally, the file fails WP:NFCC#8 at several places in the article. It should only be used in the infobox but not at dozens of places in tables. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:35, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:FREER. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:23, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:06, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8 in List of Wii U software and WP:NFCC#9 in Talk:List of Wii U software. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:37, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8 and WP:FREER. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:39, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
See c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wiki02CinoFront1965.jpg. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:54, 10 July 2016 (UTC)