The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Wikiacc ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Highly unlikely that film produced by 20th Century Fox would be released without a copyright notice. Ramaksoud2000 ( Talk to me) 00:02, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Available on Commons as File:US-DefenseThreatReductionAgency-Seal.svg. XXN, 00:06, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Available on Commons as File:Flaga Sandomierza.svg. XXN, 00:18, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Too poor in quality to be of decent use. Jon Kolbert ( talk) 05:43, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Unidentified person. Low quality. Ramaksoud2000 ( Talk to me) 00:30, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Compass logo inclusion pushes this above Threshold of originality. Clarifcation of uploader connection with logo entity desirable. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 01:38, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Invalid public domain claim. According to the IDF, their material is copyrighted and is not public domain. Whpq ( talk) 02:39, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
copyvio, per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Young ahmad kashani.jpg Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 03:44, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Unfree per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Spectator5-5-1970r-3.jpg Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 04:15, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Currently unused and unlikely to be of use to anyone. Unless the creator would rather it be moved to Commons, probably best to delete this one. ~ Rob13 Talk 09:13, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Author did not take this photo Ramaksoud2000 ( Talk to me) 09:19, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Not in the PD in the United States. ~ Rob13 Talk 09:37, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Equivalent at Commons was considered as being too simple. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:29, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Equivalent at Commons, was being treated as too simple. This is mostly text, so why is this under a non-free license here? Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:34, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
This is mostly text, equivalent at Commons is free. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:36, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Equivalent at Commons is under a 'free' license, or was considered too simple. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:38, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Equivalent at Commons, is considered too simple, so querying why this is treated as non-free locally. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:40, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Considered below threshold of originality at Commons, so querying why it's under a non-free license here. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:44, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Only seeing text, Why is thus under fair use? Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:48, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Only seeing text, why is this under fair use? Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:48, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Textlogo., Why is this under fair use locally? Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:49, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Text logo (so querying non-free use). But too small to be of practical use. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:50, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Equivalent at Commons was considered too be too simple (below threshold of originality.) Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:53, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Mostly Text, considered too simple (below threshold of originality at Commons, but I'm not sure given the stylised combination of U,M,L in a cube (right.). Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:54, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Equivalent at Commons, is 'free', so querying why this is considered non-free locally. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:56, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Replaced with File:Effective Programming for America logo.svg . XXN, 12:33, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Unused non-free logo. It is above threshold of originality, probably. I think Magog deletes such images on Commons. XXN, 12:36, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Actually it's a non-free logo, above threshold of originality. XXN, 12:41, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Actually it's a non-free logo, improperly licensed. XXN, 12:49, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:08, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Non-free film screenshot, derivative work, improperly licensed. XXN, 13:03, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:08, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Actually it's a non-free logo, improperly licensed. XXN, 13:13, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:08, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Unused old wikipedia screenshots. XXN, 13:15, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:08, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Unused non-free logo, improperly licensed. XXN, 13:26, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:08, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Unused file. GXXF T • C 14:42, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
The design on the jersey that was copied for this image is copyrightable. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:01, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Lion design is copyrightable and copied from actual jersey. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:02, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Copy of copyrightable design. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:12, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
The Bear design being copied here seems copyrightable. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:15, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Design is copyrightable. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:17, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Bulldog design seems copyrightable. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:17, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Panther design seems copyrightable. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:18, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyrightable design ~ Rob13 Talk 18:22, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyrightable design ~ Rob13 Talk 18:23, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyrightable design ~ Rob13 Talk 18:23, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyrightable design ~ Rob13 Talk 18:23, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Marked as wrong license for years, probably because of a belief that this passes the threshold of originality. Does it? ~ Rob13 Talk 18:25, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyrightable design. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:26, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyrightable logo. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:26, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Possibly copyrightable design (referring to the kangaroo outline) ~ Rob13 Talk 18:26, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Profile of a man is a copyrightable design. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:27, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Alternative version of a jersey nominated above as possibly passing the threshold of originality. See File:St.Marys Senior Football Club Jumper.png. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:28, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyrightable design. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:28, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyrightable design. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:40, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyrightable design. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:40, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyrightable design. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:40, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyrightable bear design. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:41, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyrightable design. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:42, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyrightable design. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:43, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Unable to find any reference to this logo/image in connection to the football club or location anywhere but here. Not in use anywhere on the project. Out of scope? ~ Rob13 Talk 19:12, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable company. Uploaded by an SPA, and the article was deleted as promotional. ~ Rob13 Talk 19:18, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Armes sundgau.png. Maybe convert to fair use? Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 23:12, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete. The fair use rationale's "purpose" needs to match a textual need for visualization (WP:NFCC#8), which was not forthcoming in this discussion. czar 10:04, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Fails NFCC #8 in every way imaginable, at least the way it's presently used. The Death of Eric Garner article already states multiple times that Garner is African-American; no picture is necessary to enhance the reader's understanding of that fact unless we presume the vast majority of readers have never seen any dark-skinned person, which I highly doubt is the case. He is deceased so the image is no longer needed to identify him as nobody is going to run into him when they're going to get cigarettes. There is no commentary on that image, sourced or even unsourced, in the accompanying "background" section, a serious violation of the non-free content policy. It may just be a Facebook profile photo, but U.S. copyright law does not discriminate and copyright attaches to it automatically, copyright we cannot disregard The article is not a biography of Garner, which might justify an image of him; instead is about his death. If an unfree image is deemed necessary to illustrate the article, I suggest instead that we get a still from the cell-phone video of the cops killing him, which would be relevant as it would be a picture of the event that is the subject of the article, or even a portion of that video itself, which could be obtained and converted to our formats Daniel Case ( talk) 23:45, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
a 6 ft 3 in (1.91 m) tall, 350-pound (160 kg), 43-year-old African American manadequate enough without the non-free pre-death image of him? Well, the lead image and the pre-death image don't have the same purpose. "Contextual significance" would mean circumstantial or factorial significance of Garner's death. Before I vote, I am conflicted about whether readers are trusted to understand Garner's death without the image of him before his death. Statistics say that the article has huge audience.
If we included a fair-use picture of Officer Pantaleo, would you defend it on the grounds that it would help readers see he was a human being who had to make a difficult decision? That's essentially the same thing.
" Without the pre-death image of Garner, readers would see the death as too sensational to be in Wikipedia but also to be deleted." Hmm? The death itself was the subject of considerable news coverage at the time that was enough to establish its notability without having to have a picture of the deceased. In fact, I do not know of any reading of the the notability criteria where the article's inclusion of a picture was deemed relevant.
"Also, how else would a reader understand the importance and impact of the incident? By reading the whole thing?" Well, they could read the intro, which is supposed to tell them that, and then if they're interested in understanding it better they can, and should, read the whole article.
"If 'Eric Garner' is not the topic of the article, how else would a reader recognize him?" He isn't the topic of the article. His death is. Daniel Case ( talk) 02:20, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
I mean, if it were in the article infobox I think the image would be on stronger ground with this argument ... Daniel Case ( talk) 04:16, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Also, another image File:Alan kurdi smiling playground.jpg was nominated for deletion, and the result was "keep", though other non-participants felt they were too late to vote. Not sure whether that discussion is a good precedent to this discussion, but I am providing links for a closer to decide. George Ho ( talk) 05:42, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
As for " reticence", I thought I was pretty wordy; can you either ask for what you would like to hear more argument on or perhaps choose a different word?
The "racial angle" is because I was trying to anticipate every possible counterargument; that did not seem to be problematic for anyone else in this discussion. Daniel Case ( talk) 18:47, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Wikiacc ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Highly unlikely that film produced by 20th Century Fox would be released without a copyright notice. Ramaksoud2000 ( Talk to me) 00:02, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Available on Commons as File:US-DefenseThreatReductionAgency-Seal.svg. XXN, 00:06, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Available on Commons as File:Flaga Sandomierza.svg. XXN, 00:18, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Too poor in quality to be of decent use. Jon Kolbert ( talk) 05:43, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Unidentified person. Low quality. Ramaksoud2000 ( Talk to me) 00:30, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Compass logo inclusion pushes this above Threshold of originality. Clarifcation of uploader connection with logo entity desirable. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 01:38, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Invalid public domain claim. According to the IDF, their material is copyrighted and is not public domain. Whpq ( talk) 02:39, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
copyvio, per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Young ahmad kashani.jpg Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 03:44, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Unfree per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Spectator5-5-1970r-3.jpg Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 04:15, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Currently unused and unlikely to be of use to anyone. Unless the creator would rather it be moved to Commons, probably best to delete this one. ~ Rob13 Talk 09:13, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Author did not take this photo Ramaksoud2000 ( Talk to me) 09:19, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Not in the PD in the United States. ~ Rob13 Talk 09:37, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Equivalent at Commons was considered as being too simple. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:29, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Equivalent at Commons, was being treated as too simple. This is mostly text, so why is this under a non-free license here? Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:34, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
This is mostly text, equivalent at Commons is free. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:36, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Equivalent at Commons is under a 'free' license, or was considered too simple. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:38, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Equivalent at Commons, is considered too simple, so querying why this is treated as non-free locally. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:40, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Considered below threshold of originality at Commons, so querying why it's under a non-free license here. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:44, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Only seeing text, Why is thus under fair use? Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:48, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Only seeing text, why is this under fair use? Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:48, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Textlogo., Why is this under fair use locally? Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:49, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Text logo (so querying non-free use). But too small to be of practical use. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:50, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Equivalent at Commons was considered too be too simple (below threshold of originality.) Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:53, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Mostly Text, considered too simple (below threshold of originality at Commons, but I'm not sure given the stylised combination of U,M,L in a cube (right.). Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:54, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Equivalent at Commons, is 'free', so querying why this is considered non-free locally. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:56, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Replaced with File:Effective Programming for America logo.svg . XXN, 12:33, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Unused non-free logo. It is above threshold of originality, probably. I think Magog deletes such images on Commons. XXN, 12:36, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Actually it's a non-free logo, above threshold of originality. XXN, 12:41, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Actually it's a non-free logo, improperly licensed. XXN, 12:49, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:08, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Non-free film screenshot, derivative work, improperly licensed. XXN, 13:03, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:08, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Actually it's a non-free logo, improperly licensed. XXN, 13:13, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:08, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Unused old wikipedia screenshots. XXN, 13:15, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:08, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Unused non-free logo, improperly licensed. XXN, 13:26, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:08, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Unused file. GXXF T • C 14:42, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
The design on the jersey that was copied for this image is copyrightable. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:01, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Lion design is copyrightable and copied from actual jersey. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:02, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Copy of copyrightable design. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:12, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
The Bear design being copied here seems copyrightable. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:15, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Design is copyrightable. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:17, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Bulldog design seems copyrightable. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:17, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Panther design seems copyrightable. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:18, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyrightable design ~ Rob13 Talk 18:22, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyrightable design ~ Rob13 Talk 18:23, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyrightable design ~ Rob13 Talk 18:23, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyrightable design ~ Rob13 Talk 18:23, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Marked as wrong license for years, probably because of a belief that this passes the threshold of originality. Does it? ~ Rob13 Talk 18:25, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyrightable design. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:26, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyrightable logo. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:26, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Possibly copyrightable design (referring to the kangaroo outline) ~ Rob13 Talk 18:26, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Profile of a man is a copyrightable design. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:27, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Alternative version of a jersey nominated above as possibly passing the threshold of originality. See File:St.Marys Senior Football Club Jumper.png. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:28, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyrightable design. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:28, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyrightable design. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:40, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyrightable design. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:40, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyrightable design. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:40, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyrightable bear design. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:41, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyrightable design. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:42, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyrightable design. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:43, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Unable to find any reference to this logo/image in connection to the football club or location anywhere but here. Not in use anywhere on the project. Out of scope? ~ Rob13 Talk 19:12, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable company. Uploaded by an SPA, and the article was deleted as promotional. ~ Rob13 Talk 19:18, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Armes sundgau.png. Maybe convert to fair use? Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 23:12, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete. The fair use rationale's "purpose" needs to match a textual need for visualization (WP:NFCC#8), which was not forthcoming in this discussion. czar 10:04, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Fails NFCC #8 in every way imaginable, at least the way it's presently used. The Death of Eric Garner article already states multiple times that Garner is African-American; no picture is necessary to enhance the reader's understanding of that fact unless we presume the vast majority of readers have never seen any dark-skinned person, which I highly doubt is the case. He is deceased so the image is no longer needed to identify him as nobody is going to run into him when they're going to get cigarettes. There is no commentary on that image, sourced or even unsourced, in the accompanying "background" section, a serious violation of the non-free content policy. It may just be a Facebook profile photo, but U.S. copyright law does not discriminate and copyright attaches to it automatically, copyright we cannot disregard The article is not a biography of Garner, which might justify an image of him; instead is about his death. If an unfree image is deemed necessary to illustrate the article, I suggest instead that we get a still from the cell-phone video of the cops killing him, which would be relevant as it would be a picture of the event that is the subject of the article, or even a portion of that video itself, which could be obtained and converted to our formats Daniel Case ( talk) 23:45, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
a 6 ft 3 in (1.91 m) tall, 350-pound (160 kg), 43-year-old African American manadequate enough without the non-free pre-death image of him? Well, the lead image and the pre-death image don't have the same purpose. "Contextual significance" would mean circumstantial or factorial significance of Garner's death. Before I vote, I am conflicted about whether readers are trusted to understand Garner's death without the image of him before his death. Statistics say that the article has huge audience.
If we included a fair-use picture of Officer Pantaleo, would you defend it on the grounds that it would help readers see he was a human being who had to make a difficult decision? That's essentially the same thing.
" Without the pre-death image of Garner, readers would see the death as too sensational to be in Wikipedia but also to be deleted." Hmm? The death itself was the subject of considerable news coverage at the time that was enough to establish its notability without having to have a picture of the deceased. In fact, I do not know of any reading of the the notability criteria where the article's inclusion of a picture was deemed relevant.
"Also, how else would a reader understand the importance and impact of the incident? By reading the whole thing?" Well, they could read the intro, which is supposed to tell them that, and then if they're interested in understanding it better they can, and should, read the whole article.
"If 'Eric Garner' is not the topic of the article, how else would a reader recognize him?" He isn't the topic of the article. His death is. Daniel Case ( talk) 02:20, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
I mean, if it were in the article infobox I think the image would be on stronger ground with this argument ... Daniel Case ( talk) 04:16, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Also, another image File:Alan kurdi smiling playground.jpg was nominated for deletion, and the result was "keep", though other non-participants felt they were too late to vote. Not sure whether that discussion is a good precedent to this discussion, but I am providing links for a closer to decide. George Ho ( talk) 05:42, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
As for " reticence", I thought I was pretty wordy; can you either ask for what you would like to hear more argument on or perhaps choose a different word?
The "racial angle" is because I was trying to anticipate every possible counterargument; that did not seem to be problematic for anyone else in this discussion. Daniel Case ( talk) 18:47, 23 December 2016 (UTC)