The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Source of ZIPR Consultancy but licensed as own work. Two other similar images were deleted through FFD recently ( Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 August 7#File:Ivan Karačić.jpg and Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 August 7#File:Nikola Prce.jpg). ★ Bigr Tex 03:38, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused, superior version available: File:Rotate right.svg FASTILY 07:20, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused, superior version available: File:Rotate left.svg FASTILY 07:14, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Non-free use rationale requires update; it doesn't mention either of the articles this song clip is used in. Kelly hi! 07:55, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused low quality. There are bond angle and alignment problems in several places. Commons has File:Formation of 1,2,3 triazoles with 4-chlorophenyl azideREDRAWN.svg that has problems of its own but is higher resolution and better alignment and nothing "worse" than this en.wp image. DMacks ( talk) 07:40, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
This image is the logo of a company whose Wikipedia article qualifies for speedy deletion under CSD G11. Luis150902 ( talk | contribs) 10:37, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
This file says it is non-free and is used in a way that a lot more free images are available. It is used on 2 articles to show that they campaign in an extremely small size that the image in particular shows nothing except 2 people waving their hands! If that is the use free images are available to replace it! Varun FEB2003 I am Offline 10:48, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused, superior version available: File:PolarizedOutlet.svg FASTILY 18:16, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused, superior version available: File:Lambert Cosine Law 2.svg FASTILY 18:18, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Delete. PAR ( talk) 12:10, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused, superior version available: File:Triangle diagram.svg FASTILY 18:18, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused, superior version available: File:Seal of the New York Court of Appeals.svg FASTILY 18:18, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused, superior version available: File:Mexican Service Medal ribbon.svg FASTILY 18:19, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused, superior version available: File:Bombe-menu.svg FASTILY 18:20, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Appears to be a derivative of non-free content (artwork/costume) FASTILY 18:30, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Authorship is claimed by one person (Marilyn Hamilton), but uploaded by a different person (apparently) User:Евгений Пустошкин so licensing seems suspect. jps ( talk) 21:12, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Authorship is claimed by one person (Marilyn Hamilton), but uploaded by a different person (apparently) User:Евгений Пустошкин so licensing seems suspect. jps ( talk) 21:12, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Authorship is claimed by one person (Marilyn Hamilton), but uploaded by a different person (apparently) User:Евгений Пустошкин so licensing seems suspect. jps ( talk) 21:13, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Authorship is claimed by one person (Marilyn Hamilton), but uploaded by a different person (apparently) User:Евгений Пустошкин so licensing seems suspect. jps ( talk) 21:13, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Possibly PD-Logo? AntiCompositeNumber ( Leave a message) 21:17, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Remove from all except Batman: The Dark Knight Returns ★ Bigr Tex 18:49, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Non-free cover art being used in The Dark Knight Returns, Frank Miller (comics creator)#Batman: The Dark Knight Returns and the late 1980s, Batman#The Dark Knight Returns, Modern Age of Comic Books#The rise of anti-heroes and American comic book#The Modern Age. File has a non-free use rationale for each, but only the one for the stand-alone article about comic book mini series itself seems to comply with WP:NFCC.
Use in "The Dark Knight Returns" seem appropriate for the reasons explained in WP:NFC#cite_note-2 because this is a stand-alone article about the work itself and the cover art is being used in the main infobox as the primary means of identifying this written work. Suggest keep for this article.
Use in the BLP about Frank Miller seems appropriate because per the aforementioned "cite note 2", the non-free use of cover art is typically not allowed in article about the work's author unless the cover art itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary because context required for such use by WP:NFCC#8 is lacking. Although there is a short sentence about the paper used for the comic and brief plot synopsis, there is really no need for the reader to see the cover art to understand any of what is written. Moreover, the "purpose" claimed by the non-free use rationale is "Illustration of the artist's work" which basically implies decorative use which not allowed per the NFCC. Finally, there is a wikilink to the work's stand alone article provided, so there's really no need for the image to be used again per WP:NFCC#3 for the reasons given in No. 6 of WP:NFC#UUI. Suggest remove from the the Frank Miller article.
Use in the Batman article also does not satisfy for the reasons given above. There is no sourced discussion of the cover art and it is not being used as the primary means of identification of the character at the top of the article, so the context required by NFCC#8 is lacking. There is no content in the article which requires the reader see this particular cover art to be understood and non-free use rationale's claim the the image is needed as an "Illustration of a specific point within the article" again implies decorative use. A wikilink to the stand-alone is provided, so readers can see the cover art there as explained by No. 6 NFC#UUI. Suggest remove from the character article.
"American comic book" and "Modern Age of Comic Books" are general articles about the subject of comic books. There is no specific sourced commentary about this particular cover art in either article, so the context required by NFCC#8 is lacking. Nothing in either article requires the reader see this particular cover art to be understood and the reader can see the cover art by clicking on the wikilink to the stand-alone article. The non-free rationales for these two uses claim the image is needed as an "Illustration of an example within the article" which once again implies decorative, not contextual, use. Suggest remove from both articles. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 00:18, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Keep this in the Batman article, obviously, since it does meet WP:NFCC#8, in that the whole point of that discussion is the dark tone set by that comic. The cover depicts that very tone, and this comic was instrumental in the character's development, as not only noted in the subsection about this comic but also in the lead of the Batman article. If you're going to overreach, as many of you are, then you should delete just about every comic book cover in other characters' articles. This is one of the few times where a picture of it is very appropriate. Remove it from Modern Age of Comic Books and American comic book since there's no reason for it to be in those articles. If you're going to keep this for any articles, it should be for the Batman article and The Dark Knight Returns articles. DrRC ( talk) 20:35, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
If you're going to overreach, as many of you are, then you should delete just about every comic book cover in other characters' articlesseem more like WP:OTHERFILE and WP:DELETEALL arguments than showing how the use in the Batman article meets policy. FWIW, a few hours before I started this FFD, you added a non-free use rationale for "American comic book" this edit. Now, however, you apparently you feel (per above) that the file does not belong in that article. Why add a rationale for an image you feel does not belong in the article? Simply adding a non-free use rationale does not automatically mean the file's non-free use is justified. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 00:49, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Source of ZIPR Consultancy but licensed as own work. Two other similar images were deleted through FFD recently ( Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 August 7#File:Ivan Karačić.jpg and Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 August 7#File:Nikola Prce.jpg). ★ Bigr Tex 03:38, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused, superior version available: File:Rotate right.svg FASTILY 07:20, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused, superior version available: File:Rotate left.svg FASTILY 07:14, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Non-free use rationale requires update; it doesn't mention either of the articles this song clip is used in. Kelly hi! 07:55, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused low quality. There are bond angle and alignment problems in several places. Commons has File:Formation of 1,2,3 triazoles with 4-chlorophenyl azideREDRAWN.svg that has problems of its own but is higher resolution and better alignment and nothing "worse" than this en.wp image. DMacks ( talk) 07:40, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
This image is the logo of a company whose Wikipedia article qualifies for speedy deletion under CSD G11. Luis150902 ( talk | contribs) 10:37, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
This file says it is non-free and is used in a way that a lot more free images are available. It is used on 2 articles to show that they campaign in an extremely small size that the image in particular shows nothing except 2 people waving their hands! If that is the use free images are available to replace it! Varun FEB2003 I am Offline 10:48, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused, superior version available: File:PolarizedOutlet.svg FASTILY 18:16, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused, superior version available: File:Lambert Cosine Law 2.svg FASTILY 18:18, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Delete. PAR ( talk) 12:10, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused, superior version available: File:Triangle diagram.svg FASTILY 18:18, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused, superior version available: File:Seal of the New York Court of Appeals.svg FASTILY 18:18, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused, superior version available: File:Mexican Service Medal ribbon.svg FASTILY 18:19, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused, superior version available: File:Bombe-menu.svg FASTILY 18:20, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Appears to be a derivative of non-free content (artwork/costume) FASTILY 18:30, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Authorship is claimed by one person (Marilyn Hamilton), but uploaded by a different person (apparently) User:Евгений Пустошкин so licensing seems suspect. jps ( talk) 21:12, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Authorship is claimed by one person (Marilyn Hamilton), but uploaded by a different person (apparently) User:Евгений Пустошкин so licensing seems suspect. jps ( talk) 21:12, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Authorship is claimed by one person (Marilyn Hamilton), but uploaded by a different person (apparently) User:Евгений Пустошкин so licensing seems suspect. jps ( talk) 21:13, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Authorship is claimed by one person (Marilyn Hamilton), but uploaded by a different person (apparently) User:Евгений Пустошкин so licensing seems suspect. jps ( talk) 21:13, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Possibly PD-Logo? AntiCompositeNumber ( Leave a message) 21:17, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Remove from all except Batman: The Dark Knight Returns ★ Bigr Tex 18:49, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Non-free cover art being used in The Dark Knight Returns, Frank Miller (comics creator)#Batman: The Dark Knight Returns and the late 1980s, Batman#The Dark Knight Returns, Modern Age of Comic Books#The rise of anti-heroes and American comic book#The Modern Age. File has a non-free use rationale for each, but only the one for the stand-alone article about comic book mini series itself seems to comply with WP:NFCC.
Use in "The Dark Knight Returns" seem appropriate for the reasons explained in WP:NFC#cite_note-2 because this is a stand-alone article about the work itself and the cover art is being used in the main infobox as the primary means of identifying this written work. Suggest keep for this article.
Use in the BLP about Frank Miller seems appropriate because per the aforementioned "cite note 2", the non-free use of cover art is typically not allowed in article about the work's author unless the cover art itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary because context required for such use by WP:NFCC#8 is lacking. Although there is a short sentence about the paper used for the comic and brief plot synopsis, there is really no need for the reader to see the cover art to understand any of what is written. Moreover, the "purpose" claimed by the non-free use rationale is "Illustration of the artist's work" which basically implies decorative use which not allowed per the NFCC. Finally, there is a wikilink to the work's stand alone article provided, so there's really no need for the image to be used again per WP:NFCC#3 for the reasons given in No. 6 of WP:NFC#UUI. Suggest remove from the the Frank Miller article.
Use in the Batman article also does not satisfy for the reasons given above. There is no sourced discussion of the cover art and it is not being used as the primary means of identification of the character at the top of the article, so the context required by NFCC#8 is lacking. There is no content in the article which requires the reader see this particular cover art to be understood and non-free use rationale's claim the the image is needed as an "Illustration of a specific point within the article" again implies decorative use. A wikilink to the stand-alone is provided, so readers can see the cover art there as explained by No. 6 NFC#UUI. Suggest remove from the character article.
"American comic book" and "Modern Age of Comic Books" are general articles about the subject of comic books. There is no specific sourced commentary about this particular cover art in either article, so the context required by NFCC#8 is lacking. Nothing in either article requires the reader see this particular cover art to be understood and the reader can see the cover art by clicking on the wikilink to the stand-alone article. The non-free rationales for these two uses claim the image is needed as an "Illustration of an example within the article" which once again implies decorative, not contextual, use. Suggest remove from both articles. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 00:18, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Keep this in the Batman article, obviously, since it does meet WP:NFCC#8, in that the whole point of that discussion is the dark tone set by that comic. The cover depicts that very tone, and this comic was instrumental in the character's development, as not only noted in the subsection about this comic but also in the lead of the Batman article. If you're going to overreach, as many of you are, then you should delete just about every comic book cover in other characters' articles. This is one of the few times where a picture of it is very appropriate. Remove it from Modern Age of Comic Books and American comic book since there's no reason for it to be in those articles. If you're going to keep this for any articles, it should be for the Batman article and The Dark Knight Returns articles. DrRC ( talk) 20:35, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
If you're going to overreach, as many of you are, then you should delete just about every comic book cover in other characters' articlesseem more like WP:OTHERFILE and WP:DELETEALL arguments than showing how the use in the Batman article meets policy. FWIW, a few hours before I started this FFD, you added a non-free use rationale for "American comic book" this edit. Now, however, you apparently you feel (per above) that the file does not belong in that article. Why add a rationale for an image you feel does not belong in the article? Simply adding a non-free use rationale does not automatically mean the file's non-free use is justified. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 00:49, 27 August 2016 (UTC)