The result of the discussion was: keep in Cleveland State Vikings, remove all other instances. — ξ xplicit 03:08, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Non-free logo being used in Cleveland State Vikings, Cleveland State Vikings men's basketball, Cleveland State University, Cleveland State Vikings men's soccer, and Cleveland State Vikings women's basketball. File has a non-free use rationale for each of the aforementioned articles, but only the usage in "Cleveland State Vikings" seems appropriate because it is the main article about the university's athletic teams. I don't think the non-free logo is needed in Cleveland State University#Athletics at all since that usage appears to be purely decorative and does not even come close to satisfying WP:NFCC#8 in my opinion. Usage in the individual team articles seems to fail Number 17 of WP:NFC#UUI. The freely licensed File:Cleveland State Wordmark.png being used in individual season articles like 2015–16 Cleveland State Vikings men's basketball team could be possibly used in the individual team articles without any real loss of information if the teams do not have their own specific logos. Marchjuly ( talk) 09:16, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
I believe it meets WP:NFCC#8. People identify Cleveland State University athletics with that logo. There are other Cleveland State's which would lead to confusion. See Cleveland State Community College. I feel that the logos should be kept on their respective pages with the exception of the logo on Cleveland State University#Athletics, which appears to be decoration. I believe it meets WP:NFC#UUI as there is one universal main logo for all athletics.-- SportsMaster ( talk) 14:21, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Non free user made SVGs of other logos are not allowable under NFCC MASEM ( t) 13:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Fails MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 14:02, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Fails MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 14:03, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
A historical image claimed to be the 'own work' of the uploader. — Vensatry (Talk) 14:34, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. — ξ xplicit 03:08, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#8 in that it is used to talk about the skeleton of Stethacanthidae and not the image itself or its publication. Hop on Bananas ( talk) 15:12, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Note that the uploader's only uploads are this and File:Drawing of ''Stethacanthus altonensis'', M.V.2830, first dorsal fin and spine. From LUND, R. (1974) ''Stethacanthus altonensis'' (Elasmobranchii) from the Bear Gulch Limestone of Montana.pdf (see its FFD entry above). Their only contributions are to Stethacanthidae and these two files. Hop on Bananas ( talk) 15:19, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
If both of these images are irreplaceable, I have no objections to deletion. But I'd like more details on specifically why they're irreplaceable (more specific than "complete skeletons of these species are apparently highly unusual" - if all surviving complete stethacanthid skeletons are unavailable for taking freely licensed photos of, where are they and how did they get there)? Someone in the know can tell me here, at the other image's entry, or on my talk page. Hop on Bananas ( talk) 22:37, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFC#UUI §17. A picture like this should only be used in the article about the parent company ( Telenor), but that article contains File:Telenor Group.svg instead.
Also fails WP:NFCC#9 and WP:NFCC#10c on some pages. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:35, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: keep in Partners in Crime (Doctor Who), remove all other instances. — ξ xplicit 04:39, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFLISTS in List of Doctor Who universe creatures and aliens (0–9, A–G).
Fails WP:NFCC#8 in Partners in Crime (Doctor Who) as the image isn't discussed critically there.
Fails WP:NFCC#9 in User:DReifGalaxyM31/Partners In Crime 2. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:40, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
-- [[
User:Edokter]] {{
talk}}
19:31, 6 December 2015 (UTC)The result of the discussion was: delete as failing the non-free content criteria. BethNaught ( talk) 21:31, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8 in Sailing at the 1932 Summer Olympics – Snowbird as the picture isn't critically discussed there.
Fails WP:NFCC#9 in User:NED33/sandbox. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:48, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: remove from User:Mardus/Free software projects named after animals. This logo is seemingly non-free. — ξ xplicit 04:39, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
This is claimed to be unfree, but I'm not sure if this claim is correct. According to c:Category:Mozilla Firefox logos, old Mozilla Firefox logos are unfree while new logos are free. I suspect that this also is the case with logos for other products, but I'm not sure. I also don't know whether this is a new logo or an old logo. If the claim about the file's unfree status is correct, then the file should be removed from User:Mardus/Free software projects named after animals per WP:NFCC#9, but if the uploader's claim about the file's unfree status is incorrect, then the file may remain on that page.
Also note that there is an older revision which has been deleted per WP:F5. If this revision turns out to be free, then the old revision might also be free, and should in that case be undeleted. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:53, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#3. We only need the infobox image ( File:Tree-of-life-title-card.JPG). Stefan2 ( talk) 18:21, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
EXIF says "© John Kelly / RBO / Camera Press / Retna Ltd." which suggests that the picture violates WP:NFC#UUI §7. Stefan2 ( talk) 18:45, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: remove from Jewish views on slavery#The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews. — ξ xplicit 04:39, 18 December 2015 (UTC)}
Non-free cover art being used in The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews and Jews and the slave trade#The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews. It has a non-free rationale for each use, but it only seems appropriate for the stand-alone article about the book per WP:NFC#cite note-2. The section about the book in "Jews and the slave trade" links directly to the stand-alone article using {{ main}} and the section does not specifically discuss the cover itself so there is no need for it per WP:NFCC#8. Marchjuly ( talk) 21:58, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: keep in Cleveland State Vikings, remove all other instances. — ξ xplicit 03:08, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Non-free logo being used in Cleveland State Vikings, Cleveland State Vikings men's basketball, Cleveland State University, Cleveland State Vikings men's soccer, and Cleveland State Vikings women's basketball. File has a non-free use rationale for each of the aforementioned articles, but only the usage in "Cleveland State Vikings" seems appropriate because it is the main article about the university's athletic teams. I don't think the non-free logo is needed in Cleveland State University#Athletics at all since that usage appears to be purely decorative and does not even come close to satisfying WP:NFCC#8 in my opinion. Usage in the individual team articles seems to fail Number 17 of WP:NFC#UUI. The freely licensed File:Cleveland State Wordmark.png being used in individual season articles like 2015–16 Cleveland State Vikings men's basketball team could be possibly used in the individual team articles without any real loss of information if the teams do not have their own specific logos. Marchjuly ( talk) 09:16, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
I believe it meets WP:NFCC#8. People identify Cleveland State University athletics with that logo. There are other Cleveland State's which would lead to confusion. See Cleveland State Community College. I feel that the logos should be kept on their respective pages with the exception of the logo on Cleveland State University#Athletics, which appears to be decoration. I believe it meets WP:NFC#UUI as there is one universal main logo for all athletics.-- SportsMaster ( talk) 14:21, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Non free user made SVGs of other logos are not allowable under NFCC MASEM ( t) 13:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Fails MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 14:02, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Fails MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 14:03, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
A historical image claimed to be the 'own work' of the uploader. — Vensatry (Talk) 14:34, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. — ξ xplicit 03:08, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#8 in that it is used to talk about the skeleton of Stethacanthidae and not the image itself or its publication. Hop on Bananas ( talk) 15:12, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Note that the uploader's only uploads are this and File:Drawing of ''Stethacanthus altonensis'', M.V.2830, first dorsal fin and spine. From LUND, R. (1974) ''Stethacanthus altonensis'' (Elasmobranchii) from the Bear Gulch Limestone of Montana.pdf (see its FFD entry above). Their only contributions are to Stethacanthidae and these two files. Hop on Bananas ( talk) 15:19, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
If both of these images are irreplaceable, I have no objections to deletion. But I'd like more details on specifically why they're irreplaceable (more specific than "complete skeletons of these species are apparently highly unusual" - if all surviving complete stethacanthid skeletons are unavailable for taking freely licensed photos of, where are they and how did they get there)? Someone in the know can tell me here, at the other image's entry, or on my talk page. Hop on Bananas ( talk) 22:37, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFC#UUI §17. A picture like this should only be used in the article about the parent company ( Telenor), but that article contains File:Telenor Group.svg instead.
Also fails WP:NFCC#9 and WP:NFCC#10c on some pages. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:35, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: keep in Partners in Crime (Doctor Who), remove all other instances. — ξ xplicit 04:39, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFLISTS in List of Doctor Who universe creatures and aliens (0–9, A–G).
Fails WP:NFCC#8 in Partners in Crime (Doctor Who) as the image isn't discussed critically there.
Fails WP:NFCC#9 in User:DReifGalaxyM31/Partners In Crime 2. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:40, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
-- [[
User:Edokter]] {{
talk}}
19:31, 6 December 2015 (UTC)The result of the discussion was: delete as failing the non-free content criteria. BethNaught ( talk) 21:31, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8 in Sailing at the 1932 Summer Olympics – Snowbird as the picture isn't critically discussed there.
Fails WP:NFCC#9 in User:NED33/sandbox. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:48, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: remove from User:Mardus/Free software projects named after animals. This logo is seemingly non-free. — ξ xplicit 04:39, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
This is claimed to be unfree, but I'm not sure if this claim is correct. According to c:Category:Mozilla Firefox logos, old Mozilla Firefox logos are unfree while new logos are free. I suspect that this also is the case with logos for other products, but I'm not sure. I also don't know whether this is a new logo or an old logo. If the claim about the file's unfree status is correct, then the file should be removed from User:Mardus/Free software projects named after animals per WP:NFCC#9, but if the uploader's claim about the file's unfree status is incorrect, then the file may remain on that page.
Also note that there is an older revision which has been deleted per WP:F5. If this revision turns out to be free, then the old revision might also be free, and should in that case be undeleted. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:53, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#3. We only need the infobox image ( File:Tree-of-life-title-card.JPG). Stefan2 ( talk) 18:21, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
EXIF says "© John Kelly / RBO / Camera Press / Retna Ltd." which suggests that the picture violates WP:NFC#UUI §7. Stefan2 ( talk) 18:45, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: remove from Jewish views on slavery#The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews. — ξ xplicit 04:39, 18 December 2015 (UTC)}
Non-free cover art being used in The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews and Jews and the slave trade#The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews. It has a non-free rationale for each use, but it only seems appropriate for the stand-alone article about the book per WP:NFC#cite note-2. The section about the book in "Jews and the slave trade" links directly to the stand-alone article using {{ main}} and the section does not specifically discuss the cover itself so there is no need for it per WP:NFCC#8. Marchjuly ( talk) 21:58, 6 December 2015 (UTC)