The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Obsolete - The file has been replaced by a better version. Abel ( talk) 00:04, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 16 June 2011 (UTC) reply
unused image, artilce Araneus diadematus has enough images. mabdul 08:18, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 16 June 2011 (UTC) reply
unused, File:CFBriggs.jpg in article Charles Frederick Briggs is better. mabdul 08:25, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 13 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-free image that is very similar to the one at the top of the article. the small difference (her head is turned a bit to camera) can easily be described with text, without significantly impairing reader's understanding of the topic. This image fails WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 12:08, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 13 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-free back cover with a completely innapropriate rationale. Image does not add to readers' understanding per WP:NFCC#8 and conveys information that could be covered with text alone. Peripitus (Talk) 12:11, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by King of Hearts ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:08, 8 June 2011 (UTC) reply
non-free image that is largely the combination of two existing images, both of which are in the two articles this is also in. In each article 1/2 of the image is redundant to the existing one (and fails WP:NFCC#3a) and the other 1/2 can be reached by the reader with the simple expedient of clicking once. The layout itself can be described using text alone. Image fails WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFCC#3a. Peripitus (Talk) 12:14, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by King of Hearts ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:08, 8 June 2011 (UTC) reply
recoloured album cover. The colour difference can easily be described with text replacing the need for this additional non-free image. Having this second one does not signficantly add to reader's understanding. Fails WP:NFCC#1, 8 and 3a Peripitus (Talk) 12:28, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by King of Hearts ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:08, 8 June 2011 (UTC) reply
non-free image of a 45 in its cover that shows nothing of significance for readers. - Peripitus (Talk) 12:30, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by King of Hearts ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:08, 8 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-free album cover that is largely identical to the existing one in the article. The small changes (a sticker ) can easily be described with text alone, without significantly harming reader's understanding. Image fails WP:NFCC#1 as replaceable with text and NFCC#8 in that it does not increase reader's understanding significantly. Peripitus (Talk) 12:35, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete as an unnecessary old logo. But note that "replaceable by DM uses" is not a valid argument because it is an oxymoron. By definition DM is the inclusion of a copyrighted work that is so incidental that it cannot serve as a proper replacement. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:51, 8 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Older 2000s-era logo not subject of sourced commentary in the article, and also replaceable by de minimis uses in already-existing photos of restaurant buildings where the old logo is present on the building. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 14:25, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 8 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, superseded by File:US-IL-Chicago-CA06.png Calliopejen1 ( talk) 14:59, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 8 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, superseded by File:US-IL-Chicago-CA01.png Calliopejen1 ( talk) 15:00, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 8 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, superseded by File:US-IL-Chicago-CA03.png Calliopejen1 ( talk) 15:00, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 8 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, superseded by File:US-IL-Chicago-CA02.png Calliopejen1 ( talk) 15:02, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 8 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, superseded by File:US-IL-Chicago-CA04.png Calliopejen1 ( talk) 15:02, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 8 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, superseded by File:US-IL-Chicago-CA05.png Calliopejen1 ( talk) 15:02, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by King of Hearts ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:08, 8 June 2011 (UTC) reply
dubious self-taken photo, no evidence of permission Calliopejen1 ( talk) 15:08, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 8 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 ( talk) 15:09, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by King of Hearts ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:08, 8 June 2011 (UTC) reply
i'm skeptical of the self-taken claim considering the user's other uploads (like a formal portrait labeled self-taken) Calliopejen1 ( talk) 15:12, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 13 June 2011 (UTC) reply
non-free logo (though labeled PD), does not meet WP:NFCC8 when used in biography article Calliopejen1 ( talk) 15:14, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Keep. - FASTILY (TALK) 08:56, 16 June 2011 (UTC) reply
this image is not public domain in the US because it became public domain in australia only in 2001. since it is nonfree it fails WP:NFCC8 - it is not an iconic image, and showing soldiers sitting like this could be easily conveyed with text Calliopejen1 ( talk) 15:19, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 16 June 2011 (UTC) reply
invalid reason to be public domain (only certain romanian govt docs are PD [2]),replaceable photo of living person Calliopejen1 ( talk) 15:28, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 16 June 2011 (UTC) reply
no real reason this would be PD, deleted from german wikipedia (don't know why) Calliopejen1 ( talk) 16:05, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 8 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, superseded by File:Lambda.svg Calliopejen1 ( talk) 16:06, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 8 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, invalid reason to be public domain Calliopejen1 ( talk) 16:08, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 8 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, scaled-down copy of File:Musical note nicu bucule 01 blue2.png Calliopejen1 ( talk) 16:40, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 16 June 2011 (UTC) reply
invalid reason for being PD, source link (which no longer includes this image) marked as copyrighted Calliopejen1 ( talk) 16:43, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 16 June 2011 (UTC) reply
insufficient permission per http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Images_in_Category:People_for_the_Ethical_Treatment_of_Animals - OTRS ticket wasn't valid after all Calliopejen1 ( talk) 17:32, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 16 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Obsolete: redid with Inkscape on Commons as File:Computer system bus.svg W Nowicki ( talk) 20:11, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:55, 31 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Not used, not useful. Damiens.rf 22:22, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 13 June 2011 (UTC) reply
No evidence of being public domain. Image was download from a tripod page (a free webhost). Damiens.rf 22:27, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 8 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphan. No evidence of it being released to the public domain. Damiens.rf 22:28, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Obsolete - The file has been replaced by a better version. Abel ( talk) 00:04, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 16 June 2011 (UTC) reply
unused image, artilce Araneus diadematus has enough images. mabdul 08:18, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 16 June 2011 (UTC) reply
unused, File:CFBriggs.jpg in article Charles Frederick Briggs is better. mabdul 08:25, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 13 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-free image that is very similar to the one at the top of the article. the small difference (her head is turned a bit to camera) can easily be described with text, without significantly impairing reader's understanding of the topic. This image fails WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 12:08, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 13 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-free back cover with a completely innapropriate rationale. Image does not add to readers' understanding per WP:NFCC#8 and conveys information that could be covered with text alone. Peripitus (Talk) 12:11, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by King of Hearts ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:08, 8 June 2011 (UTC) reply
non-free image that is largely the combination of two existing images, both of which are in the two articles this is also in. In each article 1/2 of the image is redundant to the existing one (and fails WP:NFCC#3a) and the other 1/2 can be reached by the reader with the simple expedient of clicking once. The layout itself can be described using text alone. Image fails WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFCC#3a. Peripitus (Talk) 12:14, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by King of Hearts ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:08, 8 June 2011 (UTC) reply
recoloured album cover. The colour difference can easily be described with text replacing the need for this additional non-free image. Having this second one does not signficantly add to reader's understanding. Fails WP:NFCC#1, 8 and 3a Peripitus (Talk) 12:28, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by King of Hearts ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:08, 8 June 2011 (UTC) reply
non-free image of a 45 in its cover that shows nothing of significance for readers. - Peripitus (Talk) 12:30, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by King of Hearts ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:08, 8 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-free album cover that is largely identical to the existing one in the article. The small changes (a sticker ) can easily be described with text alone, without significantly harming reader's understanding. Image fails WP:NFCC#1 as replaceable with text and NFCC#8 in that it does not increase reader's understanding significantly. Peripitus (Talk) 12:35, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete as an unnecessary old logo. But note that "replaceable by DM uses" is not a valid argument because it is an oxymoron. By definition DM is the inclusion of a copyrighted work that is so incidental that it cannot serve as a proper replacement. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:51, 8 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Older 2000s-era logo not subject of sourced commentary in the article, and also replaceable by de minimis uses in already-existing photos of restaurant buildings where the old logo is present on the building. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 14:25, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 8 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, superseded by File:US-IL-Chicago-CA06.png Calliopejen1 ( talk) 14:59, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 8 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, superseded by File:US-IL-Chicago-CA01.png Calliopejen1 ( talk) 15:00, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 8 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, superseded by File:US-IL-Chicago-CA03.png Calliopejen1 ( talk) 15:00, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 8 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, superseded by File:US-IL-Chicago-CA02.png Calliopejen1 ( talk) 15:02, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 8 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, superseded by File:US-IL-Chicago-CA04.png Calliopejen1 ( talk) 15:02, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 8 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, superseded by File:US-IL-Chicago-CA05.png Calliopejen1 ( talk) 15:02, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by King of Hearts ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:08, 8 June 2011 (UTC) reply
dubious self-taken photo, no evidence of permission Calliopejen1 ( talk) 15:08, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 8 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 ( talk) 15:09, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by King of Hearts ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:08, 8 June 2011 (UTC) reply
i'm skeptical of the self-taken claim considering the user's other uploads (like a formal portrait labeled self-taken) Calliopejen1 ( talk) 15:12, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 13 June 2011 (UTC) reply
non-free logo (though labeled PD), does not meet WP:NFCC8 when used in biography article Calliopejen1 ( talk) 15:14, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Keep. - FASTILY (TALK) 08:56, 16 June 2011 (UTC) reply
this image is not public domain in the US because it became public domain in australia only in 2001. since it is nonfree it fails WP:NFCC8 - it is not an iconic image, and showing soldiers sitting like this could be easily conveyed with text Calliopejen1 ( talk) 15:19, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 16 June 2011 (UTC) reply
invalid reason to be public domain (only certain romanian govt docs are PD [2]),replaceable photo of living person Calliopejen1 ( talk) 15:28, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 16 June 2011 (UTC) reply
no real reason this would be PD, deleted from german wikipedia (don't know why) Calliopejen1 ( talk) 16:05, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 8 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, superseded by File:Lambda.svg Calliopejen1 ( talk) 16:06, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 8 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, invalid reason to be public domain Calliopejen1 ( talk) 16:08, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 8 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, scaled-down copy of File:Musical note nicu bucule 01 blue2.png Calliopejen1 ( talk) 16:40, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 16 June 2011 (UTC) reply
invalid reason for being PD, source link (which no longer includes this image) marked as copyrighted Calliopejen1 ( talk) 16:43, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 16 June 2011 (UTC) reply
insufficient permission per http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Images_in_Category:People_for_the_Ethical_Treatment_of_Animals - OTRS ticket wasn't valid after all Calliopejen1 ( talk) 17:32, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 16 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Obsolete: redid with Inkscape on Commons as File:Computer system bus.svg W Nowicki ( talk) 20:11, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:55, 31 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Not used, not useful. Damiens.rf 22:22, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 13 June 2011 (UTC) reply
No evidence of being public domain. Image was download from a tripod page (a free webhost). Damiens.rf 22:27, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 8 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphan. No evidence of it being released to the public domain. Damiens.rf 22:28, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply