The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:41, 22 June 2011 (UTC) reply
File has no licensing information. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 02:36, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:42, 22 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Low resolution image that does not show its subject very clearly and only used on article talk page to indicate its replacement. File has been superseded by File:Dicrurus paradiseus -Kerala -India-6-3c.jpg, a higher-resolution picture of a live specimen of the same species. Crisco 1492 ( talk) 02:45, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:42, 22 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Useless failed proposal. — This, that, and the other (talk) 04:15, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:42, 22 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Screenshot of deleted template to show its particular problems. No file uses at all; hence, no longer needed. — This, that, and the other (talk) 04:24, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: speedy deleted per Teb728. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 19:57, 16 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Non free photo of a living person. Free replacement is definitely possible. MASEM ( t) 05:41, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
And on that purported other purpose, I don't see a lot of call for an image when it's just a one-sentence statement of "she wore this once", with the inexplicable rationalization that it shows Gaga " has been open towards Friendship is Magic", whatever that is supposed to mean. It's definitely not of a J. Lo dress-level of cultural impact or commentary. So while I don't think it necessarily fails WP:NFCC#1, it definitely fails WP:NFCC#8. postdlf ( talk) 16:55, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:42, 22 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Image showing the header of 4chan changed to "Once upon a pony" is completely replaceable by text. MASEM ( t) 06:03, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:42, 22 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Unable to confirm that this is indeed what the description says (i.e. may be a false/invented image). The license is inappropriate. File was copied from dewiki; the source of the file there is stated as "no-longer-existing UN homepage", which is unhelpful. The license at dewiki tells us that it is an "official work" in Germany, Austria or Switzerland, again very doubtful. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:31, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:42, 22 June 2011 (UTC) reply
unused lower-quality format of commons:File:Cadproc1.png by same author DMacks ( talk) 07:57, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:42, 22 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Unencyclopedic, orphaned, low quality user image. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:59, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. - FASTILY (TALK) 07:41, 22 June 2011 (UTC) Numerous files uploaded by Digitalvip ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log): reply
Minutia of a video-game ( X³: Reunion)--content likely not appropriate for WP article (was removed years ago) per excessive plot detail and WP not a gaming/user-guide. Not appropriate format either (graphic-file of text-table: data could vary in over years/new versions not easily editable). DMacks ( talk) 08:05, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:42, 22 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-free TV episode screenshot. This is the third time somebody has uploaded yet another random screenshot for this specific episode article right after the previous one was deleted. We had a group FFD for a whole bunch of proposed alternative ones a few days ago [1], which led to the deletion of the whole lot. No argument has been made why this new screenshot meets NFCC#8 more than any of the ones contained in that last bunch. It clearly doesn't. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:26, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:11, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Image from a commercial source. Violation of NFCC#2. J Milburn ( talk) 11:30, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
I thought I asked you to find an appropriate image?♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:30, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: closed as irrelevant, as the image is present on commons at File:Cairn Terrier with ball.jpg. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 04:43, 17 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 ( talk) 16:12, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: closed as irrelevant, as the image is present on commons at File:Bigg D at Miami Live.jpg. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 04:38, 17 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, unencyclopedic, low quality Acather96 ( talk) 16:13, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: closed as irrelevant, as the image is present on commons at File:Kitchen interior design.jpg]. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 05:01, 17 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, seems only being used to promote an interior design company. Acather96 ( talk) 16:24, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G5 by Magog the Ogre ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:09, 21 June 2011 (UTC) reply
This image was flagged up for potential copyright problems at the good article review of Manila hostage crisis. The uploader is a blocked suspected sock, hence it's impossible to ask for clarification. The uploader tagged the image with CC-BY-SA-3.0.
In any other case in which an image uploaded by a sock is found with copyright problems, I would speedy the image. However, in this case I would rather
assume good faith and open up the discussion to everyone else. The reason is that a
TinEye reverse image search of this image shows no match. Or rather, this image is the source image pirated by two other websites. The short duration between the upload time and the actual event, and a lack of watermarks, also gave me reasons to believe in the uploader that the picture was genuinely taken by the uploader, using a low-resolution device.
Two proposals:
Please comment. Der yck C. 17:37, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Magog the Ogre ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 15 June 2011 (UTC) reply
not required. Richardhsmith329 ( talk) 21:15, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Keep/Withdrawn. - FASTILY (TALK) 07:42, 22 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Obsoleted by File:16 Motorised Division Pistoia collar insignia.svg, which is a lossless format, while this one is not. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 21:35, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:42, 22 June 2011 (UTC) reply
obsoleted by File:Document 8.png for the same reason I listed in the nomination immediately above. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 21:37, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:42, 22 June 2011 (UTC) reply
obsoleted by File:Boston 1772.png Magog the Ogre ( talk) 21:40, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Magog the Ogre ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 15 June 2011 (UTC) reply
obsoleted by File:Far Eastern Republic (orthographic projection).svg Magog the Ogre ( talk) 21:46, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:42, 22 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The text of the article claims that the screenshot shows a lack of ego, but in fact it shows only two men in uniform, standing in front of a microphone. Aside from this claim the text needs no illustration, and the use does not significantly increase reader understanding as required by WP:NFCC#8. If the article needs to comment on the lack of ego, that can be accomplished by pure text without the need of illustration. — teb728 t c 22:33, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. - FASTILY (TALK) 00:34, 23 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The use does not significantly increase reader understanding as required by WP:NFCC#8. If the article needs to comment on the effort that the performance requires, that can be accomplished by pure text without the need of illustration. — teb728 t c 22:33, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:42, 22 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The use does not significantly increase reader understanding as required by WP:NFCC#8. If the article needs to comment on the informality of the performance, that can be accomplished by pure text without the need of illustration. — teb728 t c 22:33, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:42, 22 June 2011 (UTC) reply
One of uploader's two contributions; orphaned, and presumably never used. No encyclopedic use, and we have much better images of cats. – Drilnoth ( T • C • L) 23:49, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:41, 22 June 2011 (UTC) reply
File has no licensing information. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 02:36, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:42, 22 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Low resolution image that does not show its subject very clearly and only used on article talk page to indicate its replacement. File has been superseded by File:Dicrurus paradiseus -Kerala -India-6-3c.jpg, a higher-resolution picture of a live specimen of the same species. Crisco 1492 ( talk) 02:45, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:42, 22 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Useless failed proposal. — This, that, and the other (talk) 04:15, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:42, 22 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Screenshot of deleted template to show its particular problems. No file uses at all; hence, no longer needed. — This, that, and the other (talk) 04:24, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: speedy deleted per Teb728. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 19:57, 16 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Non free photo of a living person. Free replacement is definitely possible. MASEM ( t) 05:41, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
And on that purported other purpose, I don't see a lot of call for an image when it's just a one-sentence statement of "she wore this once", with the inexplicable rationalization that it shows Gaga " has been open towards Friendship is Magic", whatever that is supposed to mean. It's definitely not of a J. Lo dress-level of cultural impact or commentary. So while I don't think it necessarily fails WP:NFCC#1, it definitely fails WP:NFCC#8. postdlf ( talk) 16:55, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:42, 22 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Image showing the header of 4chan changed to "Once upon a pony" is completely replaceable by text. MASEM ( t) 06:03, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:42, 22 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Unable to confirm that this is indeed what the description says (i.e. may be a false/invented image). The license is inappropriate. File was copied from dewiki; the source of the file there is stated as "no-longer-existing UN homepage", which is unhelpful. The license at dewiki tells us that it is an "official work" in Germany, Austria or Switzerland, again very doubtful. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:31, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:42, 22 June 2011 (UTC) reply
unused lower-quality format of commons:File:Cadproc1.png by same author DMacks ( talk) 07:57, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:42, 22 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Unencyclopedic, orphaned, low quality user image. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:59, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. - FASTILY (TALK) 07:41, 22 June 2011 (UTC) Numerous files uploaded by Digitalvip ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log): reply
Minutia of a video-game ( X³: Reunion)--content likely not appropriate for WP article (was removed years ago) per excessive plot detail and WP not a gaming/user-guide. Not appropriate format either (graphic-file of text-table: data could vary in over years/new versions not easily editable). DMacks ( talk) 08:05, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:42, 22 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-free TV episode screenshot. This is the third time somebody has uploaded yet another random screenshot for this specific episode article right after the previous one was deleted. We had a group FFD for a whole bunch of proposed alternative ones a few days ago [1], which led to the deletion of the whole lot. No argument has been made why this new screenshot meets NFCC#8 more than any of the ones contained in that last bunch. It clearly doesn't. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:26, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:11, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Image from a commercial source. Violation of NFCC#2. J Milburn ( talk) 11:30, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
I thought I asked you to find an appropriate image?♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:30, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: closed as irrelevant, as the image is present on commons at File:Cairn Terrier with ball.jpg. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 04:43, 17 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 ( talk) 16:12, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: closed as irrelevant, as the image is present on commons at File:Bigg D at Miami Live.jpg. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 04:38, 17 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, unencyclopedic, low quality Acather96 ( talk) 16:13, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: closed as irrelevant, as the image is present on commons at File:Kitchen interior design.jpg]. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 05:01, 17 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, seems only being used to promote an interior design company. Acather96 ( talk) 16:24, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G5 by Magog the Ogre ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:09, 21 June 2011 (UTC) reply
This image was flagged up for potential copyright problems at the good article review of Manila hostage crisis. The uploader is a blocked suspected sock, hence it's impossible to ask for clarification. The uploader tagged the image with CC-BY-SA-3.0.
In any other case in which an image uploaded by a sock is found with copyright problems, I would speedy the image. However, in this case I would rather
assume good faith and open up the discussion to everyone else. The reason is that a
TinEye reverse image search of this image shows no match. Or rather, this image is the source image pirated by two other websites. The short duration between the upload time and the actual event, and a lack of watermarks, also gave me reasons to believe in the uploader that the picture was genuinely taken by the uploader, using a low-resolution device.
Two proposals:
Please comment. Der yck C. 17:37, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Magog the Ogre ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 15 June 2011 (UTC) reply
not required. Richardhsmith329 ( talk) 21:15, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Keep/Withdrawn. - FASTILY (TALK) 07:42, 22 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Obsoleted by File:16 Motorised Division Pistoia collar insignia.svg, which is a lossless format, while this one is not. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 21:35, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:42, 22 June 2011 (UTC) reply
obsoleted by File:Document 8.png for the same reason I listed in the nomination immediately above. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 21:37, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:42, 22 June 2011 (UTC) reply
obsoleted by File:Boston 1772.png Magog the Ogre ( talk) 21:40, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Magog the Ogre ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 15 June 2011 (UTC) reply
obsoleted by File:Far Eastern Republic (orthographic projection).svg Magog the Ogre ( talk) 21:46, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:42, 22 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The text of the article claims that the screenshot shows a lack of ego, but in fact it shows only two men in uniform, standing in front of a microphone. Aside from this claim the text needs no illustration, and the use does not significantly increase reader understanding as required by WP:NFCC#8. If the article needs to comment on the lack of ego, that can be accomplished by pure text without the need of illustration. — teb728 t c 22:33, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. - FASTILY (TALK) 00:34, 23 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The use does not significantly increase reader understanding as required by WP:NFCC#8. If the article needs to comment on the effort that the performance requires, that can be accomplished by pure text without the need of illustration. — teb728 t c 22:33, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:42, 22 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The use does not significantly increase reader understanding as required by WP:NFCC#8. If the article needs to comment on the informality of the performance, that can be accomplished by pure text without the need of illustration. — teb728 t c 22:33, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:42, 22 June 2011 (UTC) reply
One of uploader's two contributions; orphaned, and presumably never used. No encyclopedic use, and we have much better images of cats. – Drilnoth ( T • C • L) 23:49, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply