< February 27 | March 1 > |
---|
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 7 March 2011 (UTC) reply
No encyclopædic value. It's just made up. bobrayner ( talk) 03:26, 28 February 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Image does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:05, 28 February 2011 (UTC) reply
OB dhurd ( talk) 04:42, 28 February 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:05, 28 February 2011 (UTC) reply
new file with same name uploaded dhurd ( talk) 05:00, 28 February 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:50, 7 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Non notable image (just a DS with a blank screen), unencyclopedic unsourced, dubious claim of an "orange screen of death" caused by the user intentionally removing a cartridge while the system is on, not in use on any pages. FluffyPug ( talk) 13:37, 28 February 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:50, 7 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Portrait photograph, small size (web resolution), unlikely to be uploader's own work. Previously published on the subject's Facebook profile page [1]. Uploader claimed own work, was asked to send OTRS confirmation and failed to do so. Same uploader has also uploaded non-free screenshots as alleged own work (see File:R2.jpg, deleted at PUF, File:Mtennis2admDONE.jpg, speedied). File was restored by a fellow admin who felt a previous CSD#F11-speedy was invalid. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:03, 28 February 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:50, 7 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphan, Unencyclopedic. (No sources found relating these images to Sudbrook Magnet Middle School... Invented here?) Buzz-tardis ( talk) 14:47, 28 February 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Erroneous Nomination. When following the
listing instructions (step 2), you need to replace "File_name.ext
" with the actual name of the file. You'll also want to put the name of the uploader just after "Uploader=
", and your reason for deletion just after "Reason=
". Feel free to just replace this entire section with the corrected template. If you are still having trouble, ask for help at
WT:FFD or at my talk page.
AnomieBOT
⚡ 18:14, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
reply
DEDB ( talk) 17:45, 28 February 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: delete. The uploader negates his own license in the description, making this into an unacceptable license, technically eligible for F3 speedy deletion. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 21:23, 7 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned image. In addition to tagging it with an acceptable free license, the uploader also said, "This image is being uploaded for use in Wikipedia and for any personal uses. I would prefer that this not be used for commercial use without my prior approval." I suppose that it's debatable what the actual legal implications are of this "preference", but if the image is not in use, I think we should lean towards acceding to that preference and delete the image. B ( talk) 22:13, 28 February 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:52, 7 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Unused portrait photo of a named individual who apparently never had an article, apparently never used, uploaded by an editor with no other contributions. An IP who claims to be the subject pictured has been asking to get it deleted [2]. Fut.Perf. ☼ 23:22, 28 February 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 8 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-free image of what purports to be the production set of a TV series. No discernible function in the article, no meaningful rationale (should in fact have been speedied for lack of such), apparently purely decorative. Fut.Perf. ☼ 23:51, 28 February 2011 (UTC) reply
< February 27 | March 1 > |
---|
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 7 March 2011 (UTC) reply
No encyclopædic value. It's just made up. bobrayner ( talk) 03:26, 28 February 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Image does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:05, 28 February 2011 (UTC) reply
OB dhurd ( talk) 04:42, 28 February 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:05, 28 February 2011 (UTC) reply
new file with same name uploaded dhurd ( talk) 05:00, 28 February 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:50, 7 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Non notable image (just a DS with a blank screen), unencyclopedic unsourced, dubious claim of an "orange screen of death" caused by the user intentionally removing a cartridge while the system is on, not in use on any pages. FluffyPug ( talk) 13:37, 28 February 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:50, 7 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Portrait photograph, small size (web resolution), unlikely to be uploader's own work. Previously published on the subject's Facebook profile page [1]. Uploader claimed own work, was asked to send OTRS confirmation and failed to do so. Same uploader has also uploaded non-free screenshots as alleged own work (see File:R2.jpg, deleted at PUF, File:Mtennis2admDONE.jpg, speedied). File was restored by a fellow admin who felt a previous CSD#F11-speedy was invalid. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:03, 28 February 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:50, 7 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphan, Unencyclopedic. (No sources found relating these images to Sudbrook Magnet Middle School... Invented here?) Buzz-tardis ( talk) 14:47, 28 February 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Erroneous Nomination. When following the
listing instructions (step 2), you need to replace "File_name.ext
" with the actual name of the file. You'll also want to put the name of the uploader just after "Uploader=
", and your reason for deletion just after "Reason=
". Feel free to just replace this entire section with the corrected template. If you are still having trouble, ask for help at
WT:FFD or at my talk page.
AnomieBOT
⚡ 18:14, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
reply
DEDB ( talk) 17:45, 28 February 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: delete. The uploader negates his own license in the description, making this into an unacceptable license, technically eligible for F3 speedy deletion. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 21:23, 7 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned image. In addition to tagging it with an acceptable free license, the uploader also said, "This image is being uploaded for use in Wikipedia and for any personal uses. I would prefer that this not be used for commercial use without my prior approval." I suppose that it's debatable what the actual legal implications are of this "preference", but if the image is not in use, I think we should lean towards acceding to that preference and delete the image. B ( talk) 22:13, 28 February 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:52, 7 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Unused portrait photo of a named individual who apparently never had an article, apparently never used, uploaded by an editor with no other contributions. An IP who claims to be the subject pictured has been asking to get it deleted [2]. Fut.Perf. ☼ 23:22, 28 February 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 8 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-free image of what purports to be the production set of a TV series. No discernible function in the article, no meaningful rationale (should in fact have been speedied for lack of such), apparently purely decorative. Fut.Perf. ☼ 23:51, 28 February 2011 (UTC) reply