< February 28 | March 2 > |
---|
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:55, 8 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-free screenshot of TV episode that hasn't aired yet. No analytical commentary, apparently random scene, article is a sub-stub with no content in need of support from an image. Fails NFCC#8. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:12, 1 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:59, 8 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-free photograph of a film director, standing on an (unidentified) film set, with several (unidentified) other people from his team, in an undescript situation, talking and pointing to something. Used in the production section of an article about the film in question, but not directely related to any specific statement in the text, and not needed to understand anything in particular about it, hence fails NFCC#8. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:40, 1 March 2011 (UTC) reply
< February 28 | March 2 > |
---|
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:55, 8 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-free screenshot of TV episode that hasn't aired yet. No analytical commentary, apparently random scene, article is a sub-stub with no content in need of support from an image. Fails NFCC#8. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:12, 1 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:59, 8 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-free photograph of a film director, standing on an (unidentified) film set, with several (unidentified) other people from his team, in an undescript situation, talking and pointing to something. Used in the production section of an article about the film in question, but not directely related to any specific statement in the text, and not needed to understand anything in particular about it, hence fails NFCC#8. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:40, 1 March 2011 (UTC) reply