The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. The arguments below regarding the NFCC were persuasive, and the argument against deletion was ... not persuasive. I also am quite concerned with the idea of using previews from itunes or other music stores to adorn our articles on songs. kmccoy (talk) 19:30, 31 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:Low - Flo Rida.ogg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Adammw ( notify | contribs).

• Doesn't significantly add to the reader's understanding. Was tagged as such, however I've declined the speedy, and brought it here for discussion. PhilKnight ( talk) 13:11, 22 October 2009 (UTC) reply
• Delete. Files fails point eight of our WP:NFCC policy states, which states: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. Nothing about the musical style or characteristics of the song is discussed in the article, so there would be no detriment if the file was omitted. (Note: I originally tagged the file for deletion.) — ξ ^xplicit 20:19, 22 October 2009 (UTC) reply
• Fuck off and leave me and my uploads alone.. Adammw ( talk) 06:44, 23 October 2009 (UTC) reply
• Delete I agree with Explicit this image doesn't add any more understanding of the topic, as for user Adammw please read WP:Civility-- IngerAlHaosului ( talk) 07:54, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:09, 30 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:Iran Web screenshot.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Patchouli ( notify | contribs).

• We don't need to show non-free screenshots of blocked websites to make the point that websites sometimes are blocked. This is unnecessary use of non-free content. Damiens.rf 16:12, 22 October 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Athaenara ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:09, 29 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:Carl XVI & Silvia at White House.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Patchouli ( notify | contribs).

• Image not really found on source url. We can't verify the licensing this way. Damiens.rf 16:13, 22 October 2009 (UTC) reply

Keep as per Nyttend's comments on File:Basescu & Bush 2006 July 27.jpg, as same rational applies. Outback the koala ( talk) 04:31, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply

• Duplicate of File:20061023-1 p102306sc-0035jpg-515h.jpg from Commons. The Commons image is unused, so I will rename it to commons:File:Carl XVI & Silvia at White House.jpg and we can delete this as a shadow image. -- Martin H. ( talk) 08:34, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
  • did so. Also regarding the initial reason: The source is archived, you have to correct the url to http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/. -- Martin H. ( talk) 08:36, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 30 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:Khomeini -- CC.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Patchouli ( notify | contribs).

• Incomplete source information. Copyright holder isn't specified ad can't be determined using the information given, just like the licensing information. Damiens.rf 16:16, 22 October 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Athaenara ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 29 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:I. Sanader with G.W. Bush.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Patchouli ( notify | contribs).

• Image not really found on source url. We can't verify the licensing this way. Damiens.rf 16:17, 22 October 2009 (UTC) reply
  • After rename on Commons now with the same name there. Source corrected on Commons. -- Martin H. ( talk) 08:41, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Nja247 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:03, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:Sepah1.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Patchouli ( notify | contribs).

• gruesome unused image. Damiens.rf 16:18, 22 October 2009 (UTC) reply
• move to comons WP:NOTCENSORED - gruesome is an invalid reason. 70.29.209.91 ( talk) 03:58, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply

Close Move to commons complete image marked for speedy under F8-- IngerAlHaosului ( talk) 08:11, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply

Deleted from Commons, this is a simple copyright violation, see TinEye, see source page - the implicite authorship claim made with the licensing is wrong. -- Martin H. ( talk) 08:29, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 30 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:Guardian Council of Iran.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Patchouli ( notify | contribs).

• not used, bad quality. Damiens.rf 16:19, 22 October 2009 (UTC) reply

Close Removed delete template and moved to commons under WP:NOTREPOSITORY.Please close.-- IngerAlHaosului ( talk) 08:20, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: kept as updated. Skier Dude ( talk) 05:45, 30 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:Basescu & Bush 2006 July 27.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Patchouli ( notify | contribs).

• Image not really found on source url. We can't verify the licensing this way. Damiens.rf 16:20, 22 October 2009 (UTC) reply
• Keep, presumably the image has been removed. We don't remove images here simply because their source URLs remove them. Unless we implement a system similar to Commons' flickrreview process, or unless there's reason to call the uploader's good faith into question, we have to AGF and assume that this really was there at that time. Nyttend ( talk) 23:48, 24 October 2009 (UTC) reply
  • Simply change http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/07/images/20060727-5_d-0236-2-515h.html to http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2006/07/images/20060727-5_d-0236-2-515h.html. -- Martin H. ( talk) 08:43, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply

Close Changes made, if there are no more objections in 24 h i am removing the delete template.-- IngerAlHaosului ( talk) 06:18, 29 October 2009 (UTC) reply

Comment Removed the template and moved to commons,image is now tagged for speedy under CSD F8-- IngerAlHaosului ( talk) 18:51, 29 October 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Utcursch ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:Treason.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Patchouli ( notify | contribs).

• not used. Damiens.rf 16:22, 22 October 2009 (UTC) reply

Close Removed delete template and moved to commons under WP:NOTREPOSITORY.Please close.-- IngerAlHaosului ( talk) 08:19, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply

And is this be usefull on Commons or any other Wikimedia project? This image is simply trash, now on Commons the shared dump :( -- Martin H. ( talk) 08:45, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply

' Commons:Deletion_guidelines-- IngerAlHaosului ( talk) 10:32, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Nja247 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:03, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:Estacion Zarate.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Moebiusuibeom-en ( notify | contribs).

• There is no link to the permission and the original picture in the source shows the (C) symbol, so it is not free. File:Estacion-Saldias.jpg was erased using the same criterion. See Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2009_September_29#File:Estacion-Saldias.jpg Alpertron ( talk) 16:27, 22 October 2009 (UTC) reply
• Close No proof of permission, tagged with CSD:F9-- IngerAlHaosului ( talk) 08:29, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Nja247 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:03, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:Ferrovias Northbound.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Moebiusuibeom-en ( notify | contribs).

• There is no link to the permission and the original picture in the source shows the (C) symbol, so it is not free. File:Estacion-Saldias.jpg was erased using the same criterion. See Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2009_September_29#File:Estacion-Saldias.jpg Alpertron ( talk) 16:32, 22 October 2009 (UTC) reply
• Close No proof of permission, tagged with CSD:F9-- IngerAlHaosului ( talk) 08:29, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Nja247 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:03, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:Ferroexpreso pampeano 2 .jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Moebiusuibeom-en ( notify | contribs).

• There is no link to the permission and the original picture in the source shows the (C) symbol, so it is not free. File:Estacion-Saldias.jpg was erased using the same criterion. See Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2009_September_29#File:Estacion-Saldias.jpg Alpertron ( talk) 16:35, 22 October 2009 (UTC) reply
• Close No proof of permission, tagged with CSD:F9-- IngerAlHaosului ( talk) 08:29, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Nja247 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:03, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:Alco RSD 35.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Moebiusuibeom-en ( notify | contribs).

• There is no link to the permission and the original picture in the source shows the (C) symbol, so it is not free. File:Estacion-Saldias.jpg was erased using the same criterion. See Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2009_September_29#File:Estacion-Saldias.jpg Alpertron ( talk) 16:36, 22 October 2009 (UTC) reply
• Close No proof of permission, tagged with CSD:F9-- IngerAlHaosului ( talk) 08:29, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Athaenara ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 29 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:Law Enactments.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Patchouli ( notify | contribs).

• not used. Damiens.rf 16:37, 22 October 2009 (UTC) reply

Close Removed delete template and moved to commons under WP:NOTREPOSITORY.Please close.-- IngerAlHaosului ( talk) 07:34, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Nja247 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:03, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:Retiro-Terminal.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Moebiusuibeom-en ( notify | contribs).

• There is no link to the permission and the original picture in the source shows the (C) symbol, so it is not free. File:Estacion-Saldias.jpg was erased using the same criterion. See Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2009_September_29#File:Estacion-Saldias.jpg Alpertron ( talk) 16:38, 22 October 2009 (UTC) reply
• No proof of permission, tagged with CSD:F9-- IngerAlHaosului ( talk) 07:12, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by RHaworth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 29 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:Fourteen helpers .jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Pietru ( notify | contribs).

• incomplete source information (some website) makes it impossible to verify authenticity of material and licensing information. Damiens.rf 17:53, 22 October 2009 (UTC) reply

Nonsense!! Why not ask before presuming the file is without merit? Silly busybody. Ελληνικά όρος ή φράση ( talk) 20:28, 22 October 2009 (UTC) reply

• Delete, can't verify that it's PD. Nyttend ( talk) 23:45, 24 October 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Kmccoy ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:Windows Live Downloads.png ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Damaster98 ( notify | contribs).

• This copyrighted file, as testified by its fair-use infobox, is an older version of File:Windows Live Essentials.PNG — both files are screenshots of the same subject, namely download.live.com web site — and therefore violates Wikipedia Non-free Content Criteria policy, clause 3: Minimal extent of use. The subject of this nomination is only used in one article (as opposed to what is claimed in its fair-use rationale) and can safely be replaced by its counterpart. Fleet Command ( talk) 18:12, 22 October 2009 (UTC) reply
  • UPDATE: The author has replaced the subject of this nomination with its counterpart. This image is now not used in any article and is eligible for speedy deletion. Fleet Command ( talk) 17:54, 23 October 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:09, 30 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:Adnan Oktar Agustos2007 3 09.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mineral ( notify | contribs).

• Image of a living person, Adnan Oktar, hence easily replacable, fails WP:NFCC. According to this Slate article, he's good at self-promotion, so getting a free image on request ought to be possible.  Sandstein  18:21, 22 October 2009 (UTC) reply
• Delete, easily fails our nonfreecontent policy. Nyttend ( talk) 23:43, 24 October 2009 (UTC) reply
• He's alive, but he is in prison. Still, we might be able to get something. I'll see what I can do when I get around to reading his article. In most cases I find I can get an image quite easily. Richard001 ( talk) 12:16, 25 October 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: kept as updated. Skier Dude ( talk) 05:47, 30 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:UTorrent.png ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by SF007 ( notify | contribs).

• NFCC 10 - file does not attribute copyright holder. ViperSnake151  Talk  21:22, 22 October 2009 (UTC) reply

Close Now it does diff and its fair use with correct rational and its still used. So lets close this already.-- IngerAlHaosului ( talk) 06:57, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 30 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:100 1560.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Saopaulo1 ( notify | contribs).

• We already have a few images of a border collie, and even more on Commons. Has a default camera name, but isn't really worth the time for an administrator to delete. GrooveDog •  oh hai 23:26, 22 October 2009 (UTC) reply
• Delete, although we normally permit free images that are used for userpages, this clearly isn't the user himself/herself, and if we permit this, what's to stop us from permitting any and all personal images? Nyttend ( talk) 23:44, 24 October 2009 (UTC) reply
• Close File is now commons and is nominated for speedy under F8-- IngerAlHaosului ( talk) 06:42, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.