Note: The article appears on the article of Parque del Este, but that page is rather poor in english, so I added the link to the article in spanish too. It also appears in the article of Caracas but don't think it counts since it was added 2 days ago. If I have to renominate later, no problem.
Support as nominator --
Paolo Costa 12:07, 13 January 2012 (UTC)reply
Comment I removed the image from
Caracas, as it is over-illustrated already and the image was badly formatted. The best bet for this image is in
Parque del Este, which as you say could use some expansion. Jujutaculartalk 14:25, 13 January 2012 (UTC)reply
Comment No problem. Even though I still think the article of Caracas could really use images like this one, since the ones it has don't have good quality. This park is also a very very important landmark of the city, it is huge. --
Paolo Costa 16:18, 13 January 2012 (UTC)reply
Comment I would say it is a problem when a decent picture gets removed and bunch of crap gets left in there.
Saffron Blaze (
talk) 19:08, 13 January 2012 (UTC)reply
Indeed lots of crap there, but what really matters is if the park is more significant than the other parts of the city illustrated in the article. I don't know Caracas, but I would imagine that is more important than
this green space. --
Elekhh (
talk) 09:14, 14 January 2012 (UTC)reply
Comment Exactly why the image should not have been removed.
Saffron Blaze (
talk) 16:30, 14 January 2012 (UTC)reply
I won't stop it from being put back in but at the very least it needs to be formatted correctly. It was covering text. Jujutaculartalk 13:15, 23 January 2012 (UTC)reply
Support very good EV for Parque del Este and nice image. Indeed two years ago it was expected that articles are more substantial, but recently I saw many images promoted while illustrating stubs, so it wouldn't be fair to abstain on that ground. --
Elekhh (
talk) 09:14, 14 January 2012 (UTC)reply
Comment Added to the article about the landscape architect
Roberto Burle Marx, although of limited EV. Also added some good sources to the article. --
Elekhh (
talk) 09:54, 14 January 2012 (UTC)reply
Thank you Elekhh --
Paolo Costa 01:37, 22 January 2012 (UTC)reply
Support Per above. Impressive picture, has EV, meets criteria, deserves promotion.
Dusty777 (
talk) 02:28, 24 January 2012 (UTC)reply
Promoted File:Venezuela - Caracas - Parque del Este (58)-Venezuela - Caracas - Parque del Este (72)-4.jpg --Jujutaculartalk 13:09, 24 January 2012 (UTC)reply
Note: The article appears on the article of Parque del Este, but that page is rather poor in english, so I added the link to the article in spanish too. It also appears in the article of Caracas but don't think it counts since it was added 2 days ago. If I have to renominate later, no problem.
Support as nominator --
Paolo Costa 12:07, 13 January 2012 (UTC)reply
Comment I removed the image from
Caracas, as it is over-illustrated already and the image was badly formatted. The best bet for this image is in
Parque del Este, which as you say could use some expansion. Jujutaculartalk 14:25, 13 January 2012 (UTC)reply
Comment No problem. Even though I still think the article of Caracas could really use images like this one, since the ones it has don't have good quality. This park is also a very very important landmark of the city, it is huge. --
Paolo Costa 16:18, 13 January 2012 (UTC)reply
Comment I would say it is a problem when a decent picture gets removed and bunch of crap gets left in there.
Saffron Blaze (
talk) 19:08, 13 January 2012 (UTC)reply
Indeed lots of crap there, but what really matters is if the park is more significant than the other parts of the city illustrated in the article. I don't know Caracas, but I would imagine that is more important than
this green space. --
Elekhh (
talk) 09:14, 14 January 2012 (UTC)reply
Comment Exactly why the image should not have been removed.
Saffron Blaze (
talk) 16:30, 14 January 2012 (UTC)reply
I won't stop it from being put back in but at the very least it needs to be formatted correctly. It was covering text. Jujutaculartalk 13:15, 23 January 2012 (UTC)reply
Support very good EV for Parque del Este and nice image. Indeed two years ago it was expected that articles are more substantial, but recently I saw many images promoted while illustrating stubs, so it wouldn't be fair to abstain on that ground. --
Elekhh (
talk) 09:14, 14 January 2012 (UTC)reply
Comment Added to the article about the landscape architect
Roberto Burle Marx, although of limited EV. Also added some good sources to the article. --
Elekhh (
talk) 09:54, 14 January 2012 (UTC)reply
Thank you Elekhh --
Paolo Costa 01:37, 22 January 2012 (UTC)reply
Support Per above. Impressive picture, has EV, meets criteria, deserves promotion.
Dusty777 (
talk) 02:28, 24 January 2012 (UTC)reply
Promoted File:Venezuela - Caracas - Parque del Este (58)-Venezuela - Caracas - Parque del Este (72)-4.jpg --Jujutaculartalk 13:09, 24 January 2012 (UTC)reply