The criteria don't mention anything about that. It illustrates the article well, and is certainly striking. Support.
Raven4x4x 08:35, September 4, 2005 (UTC)
Support - have seen similar pictures by the dozends, but I am still very impressed by the building. --
Chris 73Talk 07:41, September 9, 2005 (UTC)
Support, despite the fact that there are probably hundreds of uploaded picture of the Taj Mahal this is a great photo and works well in the article.
JtkieferT |
@ |
C ----- 19:46, September 10, 2005 (UTC)
Neutral Well taken, but me & every other visitor has this exact photo, maybe a photo that captures it in a different way. I dont know how you can photograph this any other way, but I'd like to see it done. --
User:Rakkar
Support- beautiful. As some people think of the assymetricality (if that's not a word, it should be) as a bad thing, I think that is what makes the picture great.
Hojimachong02:38, 18 September 2005 (UTC)reply
The criteria don't mention anything about that. It illustrates the article well, and is certainly striking. Support.
Raven4x4x 08:35, September 4, 2005 (UTC)
Support - have seen similar pictures by the dozends, but I am still very impressed by the building. --
Chris 73Talk 07:41, September 9, 2005 (UTC)
Support, despite the fact that there are probably hundreds of uploaded picture of the Taj Mahal this is a great photo and works well in the article.
JtkieferT |
@ |
C ----- 19:46, September 10, 2005 (UTC)
Neutral Well taken, but me & every other visitor has this exact photo, maybe a photo that captures it in a different way. I dont know how you can photograph this any other way, but I'd like to see it done. --
User:Rakkar
Support- beautiful. As some people think of the assymetricality (if that's not a word, it should be) as a bad thing, I think that is what makes the picture great.
Hojimachong02:38, 18 September 2005 (UTC)reply