- Reason
- I saw this picture on Commons Featured Picture Candidates and thought it deserved a chance here. It is of high quality and of value to the article.
- Articles this image appears in
- Nymphenburg Palace
- Creator
- user:Richard Bartz
- Support as nominator Nautica Shad es 19:58, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Support iftilt is fixed. Latics ( talk) 22:08, 11 May 2008 (UTC)- Yes, I'd appreciate if someone did that. Unfortunately, I don't own the software to do it myself.
Nautica
Shad
es
21:32, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
- I'll do it myself tomorrow if I get time. Unless someone else wants to do it, I'll try to edit and have it up tomorrow afternoon. Latics ( talk) 00:14, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Support edit 2Latics ( talk) 22:27, 15 May 2008 (UTC)- Support edit 2 or 3 Latics ( talk) 01:58, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, I'd appreciate if someone did that. Unfortunately, I don't own the software to do it myself.
Nautica
Shad
es
21:32, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
- Support well done. — αἰτίας • discussion• 10:13, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- Support-The quality of pictures each years just increases. Meldshal42 Hit me What I've Done 23:11, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
- Support edit 2 great shot. —dima /talk/ 03:15, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
- Support Edit 2 Wow, the thumbnail really doesn't do it justice. faithless (speak) 09:39, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
- Support edit 2 Good job, very nice image. Spencer T♦ C 03:09, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Umm, this image is used only a gallery on Nymphenburg Palace, which would mean it doesn't really add value to the article. (I'm quite surprised everyone missed this.) Please find a better home for it. MER-C 11:54, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- In my opinion, it is a far better image of the palace than any of the others in the article. I'm going to be bold and feature it more prominently. Nautica Shad es 20:39, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- I also added it to a gallery of historical buildings of Bavaria. I doesn't add a lot of value to that article, but the palace should be mentioned there anyway. Nautica Shad es 20:56, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Edit 2 has very bad compression artefacts in the sky. Original has some weird gradations as well (scroll from left to right at full res and look at the sky change) -- 118.138.220.97 ( talk) 23:20, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Would you like me to save edit 2 at a higher quality? Latics ( talk) 02:27, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- I think you should save it with the same quality as that of the original. FPs have to be as good as possible. Muhammad (talk) 12:40, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Alright. I'll have it up by midnight ( CST), at least. Latics ( talk) 20:48, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Newer version is up... Latics ( talk) 02:06, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- Support (preference for edit 3) great image, meets all the criteria. 20:30, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- Note:The above vote was made by User:Guest9999. Spencer T♦ C 13:56, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
Promoted Image:Image-Schloss Nymphenburg Munich CC edit3.jpg, edit 2 without the artifacts. MER-C 11:05, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Reason
- I saw this picture on Commons Featured Picture Candidates and thought it deserved a chance here. It is of high quality and of value to the article.
- Articles this image appears in
- Nymphenburg Palace
- Creator
- user:Richard Bartz
- Support as nominator Nautica Shad es 19:58, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Support iftilt is fixed. Latics ( talk) 22:08, 11 May 2008 (UTC)- Yes, I'd appreciate if someone did that. Unfortunately, I don't own the software to do it myself.
Nautica
Shad
es
21:32, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
- I'll do it myself tomorrow if I get time. Unless someone else wants to do it, I'll try to edit and have it up tomorrow afternoon. Latics ( talk) 00:14, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Support edit 2Latics ( talk) 22:27, 15 May 2008 (UTC)- Support edit 2 or 3 Latics ( talk) 01:58, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, I'd appreciate if someone did that. Unfortunately, I don't own the software to do it myself.
Nautica
Shad
es
21:32, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
- Support well done. — αἰτίας • discussion• 10:13, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- Support-The quality of pictures each years just increases. Meldshal42 Hit me What I've Done 23:11, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
- Support edit 2 great shot. —dima /talk/ 03:15, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
- Support Edit 2 Wow, the thumbnail really doesn't do it justice. faithless (speak) 09:39, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
- Support edit 2 Good job, very nice image. Spencer T♦ C 03:09, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Umm, this image is used only a gallery on Nymphenburg Palace, which would mean it doesn't really add value to the article. (I'm quite surprised everyone missed this.) Please find a better home for it. MER-C 11:54, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- In my opinion, it is a far better image of the palace than any of the others in the article. I'm going to be bold and feature it more prominently. Nautica Shad es 20:39, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- I also added it to a gallery of historical buildings of Bavaria. I doesn't add a lot of value to that article, but the palace should be mentioned there anyway. Nautica Shad es 20:56, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Edit 2 has very bad compression artefacts in the sky. Original has some weird gradations as well (scroll from left to right at full res and look at the sky change) -- 118.138.220.97 ( talk) 23:20, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Would you like me to save edit 2 at a higher quality? Latics ( talk) 02:27, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- I think you should save it with the same quality as that of the original. FPs have to be as good as possible. Muhammad (talk) 12:40, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Alright. I'll have it up by midnight ( CST), at least. Latics ( talk) 20:48, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Newer version is up... Latics ( talk) 02:06, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- Support (preference for edit 3) great image, meets all the criteria. 20:30, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- Note:The above vote was made by User:Guest9999. Spencer T♦ C 13:56, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
Promoted Image:Image-Schloss Nymphenburg Munich CC edit3.jpg, edit 2 without the artifacts. MER-C 11:05, 27 May 2008 (UTC)