Too small, artifacting, a lot of people.
- Nominate and delist. - — Vanderdecken∴ ∫ ξ φ 15:47, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delist, per nom. -- moondigger 20:13, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delist per nom. -- Glaurung 05:56, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Excellent scene. "A lot of people"?? Would you oppose a photograph of Time Square because it has people in it? That's a ridiculous argument. — BRIAN 0918 • 2006-07-17 19:11
- Size is more of a problem here. I'm am leaving a note on the uploader's talk page to see if he can provide a higher resolution version. Glaurung 06:00, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep -- Chris 73 | Talk 22:39, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delist per nom. -- Daĉjo почта 14:36, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delist. An infinitely better image could easily be re-taken, minus the blue light of course, but that is hardly relevent to the National Gallery as it was for a PEPSI commercial. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 09:26, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
Delisted Raven4x4x 07:06, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Too small, artifacting, a lot of people.
- Nominate and delist. - — Vanderdecken∴ ∫ ξ φ 15:47, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delist, per nom. -- moondigger 20:13, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delist per nom. -- Glaurung 05:56, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Excellent scene. "A lot of people"?? Would you oppose a photograph of Time Square because it has people in it? That's a ridiculous argument. — BRIAN 0918 • 2006-07-17 19:11
- Size is more of a problem here. I'm am leaving a note on the uploader's talk page to see if he can provide a higher resolution version. Glaurung 06:00, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep -- Chris 73 | Talk 22:39, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delist per nom. -- Daĉjo почта 14:36, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delist. An infinitely better image could easily be re-taken, minus the blue light of course, but that is hardly relevent to the National Gallery as it was for a PEPSI commercial. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 09:26, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
Delisted Raven4x4x 07:06, 24 July 2006 (UTC)