Mouse had no image explaining the basic function. I pulled some patent images but this one adds color and motion. The photo is original as well. -
jk 03:07, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC) (changing start date of nomination --
Solipsist 21:45, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC))
Nominate and support. First vote here -
jk 17:41, 23 May 2005 (UTC)reply
This one seemed to disappear from FPC.
ed g2s •
talk 11:16, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Let's give this one another two weeks. Today is the first time I've seen it in the nominations page. -
Bevo 03:07, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support - very nicely done. I think the big red arrow could use a little work though. —
Josh Lee 22:33, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC)
Strong support. Nice to see the inside of a mouse without having to destroy the one I use. It's very informative and the image is nicely done.
Mgm|
(talk) 09:53, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)
Support, fantastic diagram.
the wub (talk) 14:13, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support, but I think it would have been better if the original image of the mouse was of higher quality (this one is a bit dark). But the illustrative parts are great. --
Fir0002 04:37, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
Support. Resolution could have been bigger though.
Junes 16:52, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose. I don't like the blurry mouse. It's all a bit dull. --
SilversmithHewwo 18:10, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support, but I agree with.
Fir0002 --
CVaneg 18:28, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose. The mouse is dull and low res. Illustration could do without the red arrow I think.
Chicago god 18:53, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Come on! How high a resolution do you need? You can't make it any bigger than the original mouse image. -
Mgm|
(talk) 10:10, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
Support. This is an image I might have nominated myself. I quite like the fact that the photographic part is blurred as it gives
visual weight to the illustrated cut away portion. --
Solipsist 18:54, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose Average, would support if it was animated to show how wheels move when the mouse moves horizontally and vertically. --
Dzof 11:09, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Mouse had no image explaining the basic function. I pulled some patent images but this one adds color and motion. The photo is original as well. -
jk 03:07, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC) (changing start date of nomination --
Solipsist 21:45, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC))
Nominate and support. First vote here -
jk 17:41, 23 May 2005 (UTC)reply
This one seemed to disappear from FPC.
ed g2s •
talk 11:16, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Let's give this one another two weeks. Today is the first time I've seen it in the nominations page. -
Bevo 03:07, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support - very nicely done. I think the big red arrow could use a little work though. —
Josh Lee 22:33, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC)
Strong support. Nice to see the inside of a mouse without having to destroy the one I use. It's very informative and the image is nicely done.
Mgm|
(talk) 09:53, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)
Support, fantastic diagram.
the wub (talk) 14:13, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support, but I think it would have been better if the original image of the mouse was of higher quality (this one is a bit dark). But the illustrative parts are great. --
Fir0002 04:37, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
Support. Resolution could have been bigger though.
Junes 16:52, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose. I don't like the blurry mouse. It's all a bit dull. --
SilversmithHewwo 18:10, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support, but I agree with.
Fir0002 --
CVaneg 18:28, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose. The mouse is dull and low res. Illustration could do without the red arrow I think.
Chicago god 18:53, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Come on! How high a resolution do you need? You can't make it any bigger than the original mouse image. -
Mgm|
(talk) 10:10, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
Support. This is an image I might have nominated myself. I quite like the fact that the photographic part is blurred as it gives
visual weight to the illustrated cut away portion. --
Solipsist 18:54, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose Average, would support if it was animated to show how wheels move when the mouse moves horizontally and vertically. --
Dzof 11:09, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)