Significant amount of detail, in a setting you don't normally associate with penguins. Currently featured at Magellanic penguin. -   BRIAN 0918  16:31, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Nominate and support. -   BRIAN 0918  16:31, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Support -If i'm being super nitpicky I'd say the DOF is a bit too narrow but it's otherwise very good, so... easily overlooked!-- Deglr6328 17:27, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• That is one beautiful penguin. Support. Tygar 10:02, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)
• Support, though I'd prefer a little bit more contrast between the black colors in the penguin and the background. Mgm| ^(talk) 12:21, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)
  • If you want contrast, go with one of those antarctic penguins, this one doesn't like the cold :)   BRIAN 0918  15:28, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Support. The penguin in the low res photo looks a bit raggedy, but the full image has great clarity. -- Fir0002 04:12, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• I have somewhat brightened up the background in the second picture. The background was just too black. Now the pinguin stands out against the background. JoJan 15:04, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Support the modified version. --  BRIAN 0918  20:26, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Strong support for version 2. — Korath ( Talk) 22:20, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC)
• Support #2, just what the image needed. Junes 20:23, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• support either. -- SPUI ( talk) 08:40, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Promoted #2. +9/-0. --  BRIAN 0918  02:11, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)