Atmosphere of Jupiter
Illustrates Jupiter (planet) sublimely.
- Nominate and support — Sandover 07:07, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose. Jonas Olson 07:34, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose - seems to have been very heavily post-processed to bring out detail for analysis. I'd prefer a more realistic view - Adrian Pingstone 08:13, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Support - bringing out detail isn't a bad thing; that's how it's done with all the nebula images which are featured. They're actually pretty dull looking without the false colors. -- brian0918 ™ 14:35, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Support,
but barely.The swirling fluidity is very beautiful and mesmerizing.However, the resolution is low and the banding artefacts of the scanning vidicon tube are distracting.-- Deglr6328 01:01, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)- Bigger resolution=me likey :)-- Deglr6328 03:31, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- support Beautiful and certainly add significantly. Circeus 01:59, Apr 19, 2005 (UTC)
- Support Original. I have made a half hearted attempt at removing the banding artefacts of the scanning vidicon tube, but of course that came at the expense of blurring the image slightly. I don't think that they are too bad on the original and only really become visible on the full res photo. -- Fir0002 07:51, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Support either. lovely. Enochlau 10:56, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Support edited image. I remember how this image took my breath away when I first saw it. Denni ☯ 02:23, 2005 Apr 20 (UTC)
- Oppose. Agree with Adrian Pingstone. Janderk 08:01, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Support. There are multiple views in the article, and this one certainly enriches it.-- Eloquence * 05:33, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)
Promoted Image:Jupiter from Voyager 1.jpg +8 / -3 No clear preference for either version, so I will go with
Image:Jupiter from Voyager 1.jpg which is on Commons and appears to be identical to #1 here.
Atmosphere of Jupiter
Illustrates Jupiter (planet) sublimely.
- Nominate and support — Sandover 07:07, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose. Jonas Olson 07:34, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose - seems to have been very heavily post-processed to bring out detail for analysis. I'd prefer a more realistic view - Adrian Pingstone 08:13, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Support - bringing out detail isn't a bad thing; that's how it's done with all the nebula images which are featured. They're actually pretty dull looking without the false colors. -- brian0918 ™ 14:35, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Support,
but barely.The swirling fluidity is very beautiful and mesmerizing.However, the resolution is low and the banding artefacts of the scanning vidicon tube are distracting.-- Deglr6328 01:01, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)- Bigger resolution=me likey :)-- Deglr6328 03:31, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- support Beautiful and certainly add significantly. Circeus 01:59, Apr 19, 2005 (UTC)
- Support Original. I have made a half hearted attempt at removing the banding artefacts of the scanning vidicon tube, but of course that came at the expense of blurring the image slightly. I don't think that they are too bad on the original and only really become visible on the full res photo. -- Fir0002 07:51, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Support either. lovely. Enochlau 10:56, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Support edited image. I remember how this image took my breath away when I first saw it. Denni ☯ 02:23, 2005 Apr 20 (UTC)
- Oppose. Agree with Adrian Pingstone. Janderk 08:01, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Support. There are multiple views in the article, and this one certainly enriches it.-- Eloquence * 05:33, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)
Promoted Image:Jupiter from Voyager 1.jpg +8 / -3 No clear preference for either version, so I will go with
Image:Jupiter from Voyager 1.jpg which is on Commons and appears to be identical to #1 here.