Support if tilt is fixed.
Latics (
talk) 22:08, 11 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Yes, I'd appreciate if someone did that. Unfortunately, I don't own the software to do it myself. NauticaShades 21:32, 12 May 2008 (UTC)reply
I'll do it myself tomorrow if I get time. Unless someone else wants to do it, I'll try to edit and have it up tomorrow afternoon.
Latics (
talk) 00:14, 13 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Support edit 2 great shot.
—dima/talk/ 03:15, 17 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Support Edit 2 Wow, the thumbnail really doesn't do it justice.
faithless(speak) 09:39, 17 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Support edit 2 Good job, very nice image. SpencerT♦C 03:09, 18 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Umm, this image is used only a gallery on
Nymphenburg Palace, which would mean it doesn't really add value to the article. (I'm quite surprised everyone missed this.) Please find a better home for it.
MER-C 11:54, 19 May 2008 (UTC)reply
In my opinion, it is a far better image of the palace than any of the others in the article. I'm going to be
bold and feature it more prominently. NauticaShades 20:39, 19 May 2008 (UTC)reply
I also added it to a gallery of historical buildings of Bavaria. I doesn't add a lot of value to that article, but the palace should be mentioned there anyway. NauticaShades 20:56, 19 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Comment Edit 2 has very bad compression artefacts in the sky. Original has some weird gradations as well (scroll from left to right at full res and look at the sky change) --
118.138.220.97 (
talk) 23:20, 19 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Would you like me to save edit 2 at a higher quality?
Latics (
talk) 02:27, 20 May 2008 (UTC)reply
I think you should save it with the same quality as that of the original. FPs have to be as good as possible.
Muhammad(talk) 12:40, 20 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Alright. I'll have it up by midnight (
CST), at least.
Latics (
talk) 20:48, 20 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Newer version is up...
Latics (
talk) 02:06, 21 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Support (preference for edit 3) great image, meets all the
criteria. 20:30, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Support if tilt is fixed.
Latics (
talk) 22:08, 11 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Yes, I'd appreciate if someone did that. Unfortunately, I don't own the software to do it myself. NauticaShades 21:32, 12 May 2008 (UTC)reply
I'll do it myself tomorrow if I get time. Unless someone else wants to do it, I'll try to edit and have it up tomorrow afternoon.
Latics (
talk) 00:14, 13 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Support edit 2 great shot.
—dima/talk/ 03:15, 17 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Support Edit 2 Wow, the thumbnail really doesn't do it justice.
faithless(speak) 09:39, 17 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Support edit 2 Good job, very nice image. SpencerT♦C 03:09, 18 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Umm, this image is used only a gallery on
Nymphenburg Palace, which would mean it doesn't really add value to the article. (I'm quite surprised everyone missed this.) Please find a better home for it.
MER-C 11:54, 19 May 2008 (UTC)reply
In my opinion, it is a far better image of the palace than any of the others in the article. I'm going to be
bold and feature it more prominently. NauticaShades 20:39, 19 May 2008 (UTC)reply
I also added it to a gallery of historical buildings of Bavaria. I doesn't add a lot of value to that article, but the palace should be mentioned there anyway. NauticaShades 20:56, 19 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Comment Edit 2 has very bad compression artefacts in the sky. Original has some weird gradations as well (scroll from left to right at full res and look at the sky change) --
118.138.220.97 (
talk) 23:20, 19 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Would you like me to save edit 2 at a higher quality?
Latics (
talk) 02:27, 20 May 2008 (UTC)reply
I think you should save it with the same quality as that of the original. FPs have to be as good as possible.
Muhammad(talk) 12:40, 20 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Alright. I'll have it up by midnight (
CST), at least.
Latics (
talk) 20:48, 20 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Newer version is up...
Latics (
talk) 02:06, 21 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Support (preference for edit 3) great image, meets all the
criteria. 20:30, 21 May 2008 (UTC)