Strong Support - It could be blurry and maybe out of focus, yet that animation brings much more educational and encyclopedic value than many other "sharp" pictures. It looks to me that Wikipedia POD should be more concern about bringing up unique and educational pictures instead of maybe beautiful but very common ones. After all Wikipedia is not a photo contest. It is Encyclopedia.
Mbz1 |
Talk
Support per above - yay geologically active bodies other than earth! The ejecta get so far out there too...
Debivort 05:00, 17 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Strong Support possibly the only image of its kind
Jellocube27 06:00, 17 May 2007 (UTC)reply
CommentSupport. I would love to support this, but the image description page currently lacks a caption. The blurb
here probably isn't public domain, as it's on a Johns Hopkins University website, otherwise I'd paste that in. --
Avenue 12:30, 17 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Thanks; I now support it. I'd also like to see a strip (per Pengo below), but I think the current version is good enough to be featured as is. --
Avenue 22:39, 17 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Comment Is it possible to have these 5 images laid out as a strip too, so they can be studied more closely? Animation is good but it's nice to have an alternative (and non-moving) way to view the images too. —
Pengo 14:21, 17 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Support - The caption should mention that the
ejecta gets up to 350km in altitude (the space shuttle would have to
dodge it)! —The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
TotoBaggins (
talk •
contribs) 15:56, 17 May 2007 (UTC).reply
I've added the height to the caption here (it's already on the image description page). --
Avenue 09:31, 18 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Support Of all GIF animations I've seen, this one is the most "spaced-out"... ;-) --
Janke |
Talk 17:09, 17 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Support Very interesting and unique. —
BRIAN0918 • 2007-05-17 18:17Z
Comment While I recognize the uniqueness of the animation, I also feel that it has very poor quality, even given the circumstances. I imagine this was compressed to make it work as an animation? If the uncompressed, larger files could be uploaded as a strip, per Pengo, I might support.--
HereToHelp 20:38, 17 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Weak Support, I so want to support this on encyclopaedic grounds, but the poor quality may be just too much. It's hard to discern what's exactly going on without the blurb. Centy 22:02, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Support Even if its 500 million miles away.
Bewareofdog 23:58, 17 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Strong Support - It could be blurry and maybe out of focus, yet that animation brings much more educational and encyclopedic value than many other "sharp" pictures. It looks to me that Wikipedia POD should be more concern about bringing up unique and educational pictures instead of maybe beautiful but very common ones. After all Wikipedia is not a photo contest. It is Encyclopedia.
Mbz1 |
Talk
Support per above - yay geologically active bodies other than earth! The ejecta get so far out there too...
Debivort 05:00, 17 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Strong Support possibly the only image of its kind
Jellocube27 06:00, 17 May 2007 (UTC)reply
CommentSupport. I would love to support this, but the image description page currently lacks a caption. The blurb
here probably isn't public domain, as it's on a Johns Hopkins University website, otherwise I'd paste that in. --
Avenue 12:30, 17 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Thanks; I now support it. I'd also like to see a strip (per Pengo below), but I think the current version is good enough to be featured as is. --
Avenue 22:39, 17 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Comment Is it possible to have these 5 images laid out as a strip too, so they can be studied more closely? Animation is good but it's nice to have an alternative (and non-moving) way to view the images too. —
Pengo 14:21, 17 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Support - The caption should mention that the
ejecta gets up to 350km in altitude (the space shuttle would have to
dodge it)! —The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
TotoBaggins (
talk •
contribs) 15:56, 17 May 2007 (UTC).reply
I've added the height to the caption here (it's already on the image description page). --
Avenue 09:31, 18 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Support Of all GIF animations I've seen, this one is the most "spaced-out"... ;-) --
Janke |
Talk 17:09, 17 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Support Very interesting and unique. —
BRIAN0918 • 2007-05-17 18:17Z
Comment While I recognize the uniqueness of the animation, I also feel that it has very poor quality, even given the circumstances. I imagine this was compressed to make it work as an animation? If the uncompressed, larger files could be uploaded as a strip, per Pengo, I might support.--
HereToHelp 20:38, 17 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Weak Support, I so want to support this on encyclopaedic grounds, but the poor quality may be just too much. It's hard to discern what's exactly going on without the blurb. Centy 22:02, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Support Even if its 500 million miles away.
Bewareofdog 23:58, 17 May 2007 (UTC)reply