Gothic Revival style structure
- Reason
- High EV, high resolution
- Articles this image appears in
- Gothic Revival architecture
- Creator
- National Park Service
- Support as nominator --Samwb123 T- C- @ 17:24, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- Support per nomination. Nostalgic. Durova 373 21:37, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose First, this isn't exactly the epitome of gothic revival, as a visit to the article will show. Additionally, it's a cut off photo of a bridge, showing only a whimsical support system, where inclusion of the entire bridge is warranted. Other minor negatives: the photo's in black and white, but from 1984; the photo needs some minor edits to remove scratches and dust. upstate NYer 22:51, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- Weak support I think is a nice and clear example of gothic revival/neogothic. The design style is manifest in the detail rather than in the overall span of the bridge, thus I see no problem in not capturing the whole bridge like here. I agree though that BW makes it more nostalgic and maybe more attractive but somewhat less EV. Elekhh ( talk) 01:46, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
- Support. Good technical quality, interesting subject, agree with Elekhh about the value of focusing on the detail. NotFromUtrecht ( talk) 17:41, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose no enc. reason for B&W. Cacophony ( talk) 08:26, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose mainly per Cacophony. -- mcshadypl T C 17:44, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose: Pretty much what UpstateNYer said. Maedin\ talk 08:21, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Not promoted -- Makeemlighter ( talk) 23:20, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Gothic Revival style structure
- Reason
- High EV, high resolution
- Articles this image appears in
- Gothic Revival architecture
- Creator
- National Park Service
- Support as nominator --Samwb123 T- C- @ 17:24, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- Support per nomination. Nostalgic. Durova 373 21:37, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose First, this isn't exactly the epitome of gothic revival, as a visit to the article will show. Additionally, it's a cut off photo of a bridge, showing only a whimsical support system, where inclusion of the entire bridge is warranted. Other minor negatives: the photo's in black and white, but from 1984; the photo needs some minor edits to remove scratches and dust. upstate NYer 22:51, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- Weak support I think is a nice and clear example of gothic revival/neogothic. The design style is manifest in the detail rather than in the overall span of the bridge, thus I see no problem in not capturing the whole bridge like here. I agree though that BW makes it more nostalgic and maybe more attractive but somewhat less EV. Elekhh ( talk) 01:46, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
- Support. Good technical quality, interesting subject, agree with Elekhh about the value of focusing on the detail. NotFromUtrecht ( talk) 17:41, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose no enc. reason for B&W. Cacophony ( talk) 08:26, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose mainly per Cacophony. -- mcshadypl T C 17:44, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose: Pretty much what UpstateNYer said. Maedin\ talk 08:21, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Not promoted -- Makeemlighter ( talk) 23:20, 15 December 2009 (UTC)