Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2012 at 08:13:32 (UTC)
Original – Russian soprano Galina Vishnevskaya made several recordings during her long career. After retiring from stage performances, she stage directed one of
Rimsky-Korsakov's operas and later opened an opera theatre in Moscow. She starred in the 2007 Russian film Alexandra.Alt 1: improved WBAlt 2: second attempt at WB correction
Reason
A noteworthy soprano who died on Tuesday. The portrait is clear, is of good resolution, and high quality. Unsure about the white balance though.
Support Alt 2. Yeah, I'm not sure about the skin tones/WB either, and I'm not sure if edits would improve things as the skin does look a bit posterised already. But it's still easily up to FP standards IMO, and one of the better portraits I've seen here recently, with a good mix of technical quality and character.
Ðiliff«»(Talk)12:18, 13 December 2012 (UTC)reply
Hmm. The hair in Alt 2 looks a little purple in places, but of course that can happen with a particularly zealous dye job (I don't mean to speak ill of the dead, but that's clearly what we're looking at). I'm uncertain, but it's an awfully nice portrait particularly for a candid shot, and I'm willing to support alt 2, with slight doubts.
Chick Bowen06:23, 18 December 2012 (UTC)reply
I did also lighten the shadows slightly as the blacks were a little underexposed, which I suppose brought out the purple colouring of her hair. When you say doubts, what are you doubting exactly? Whether the purple tint in her hair is real, or imposed by the WB correction?
Ðiliff«»(Talk)08:15, 18 December 2012 (UTC)reply
Umm, the answer wasn't supposed to be yes or no, I was asking which of the two alternatives (if I was correct about either) you were referring to. One alternative was doubting whether the tint is real, the other was doubting whether, as a result of the introduced purple tint, the WB correction was accurate?
Ðiliff«»(Talk)18:11, 18 December 2012 (UTC)reply
Ah, I apologize. I believe the WB correction has gone beyond what the lighting and exposure of the shot would have allowed, and that the purple is evidence of this. However, I think the image is probably slightly underexposed, and thus I'm not sure a perfect white balance, while still bringing out the detail lost in the dark areas of the original, is possible.
Chick Bowen01:13, 19 December 2012 (UTC)reply
Support Alt 2. Overall a good photograph, the WB in the original is way off and I didn't realize that people mummified as fast as shown in Alt 1 but Alt 2 has a good balance. Cat-fivetc ----
13:17, 21 December 2012 (UTC)reply
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2012 at 08:13:32 (UTC)
Original – Russian soprano Galina Vishnevskaya made several recordings during her long career. After retiring from stage performances, she stage directed one of
Rimsky-Korsakov's operas and later opened an opera theatre in Moscow. She starred in the 2007 Russian film Alexandra.Alt 1: improved WBAlt 2: second attempt at WB correction
Reason
A noteworthy soprano who died on Tuesday. The portrait is clear, is of good resolution, and high quality. Unsure about the white balance though.
Support Alt 2. Yeah, I'm not sure about the skin tones/WB either, and I'm not sure if edits would improve things as the skin does look a bit posterised already. But it's still easily up to FP standards IMO, and one of the better portraits I've seen here recently, with a good mix of technical quality and character.
Ðiliff«»(Talk)12:18, 13 December 2012 (UTC)reply
Hmm. The hair in Alt 2 looks a little purple in places, but of course that can happen with a particularly zealous dye job (I don't mean to speak ill of the dead, but that's clearly what we're looking at). I'm uncertain, but it's an awfully nice portrait particularly for a candid shot, and I'm willing to support alt 2, with slight doubts.
Chick Bowen06:23, 18 December 2012 (UTC)reply
I did also lighten the shadows slightly as the blacks were a little underexposed, which I suppose brought out the purple colouring of her hair. When you say doubts, what are you doubting exactly? Whether the purple tint in her hair is real, or imposed by the WB correction?
Ðiliff«»(Talk)08:15, 18 December 2012 (UTC)reply
Umm, the answer wasn't supposed to be yes or no, I was asking which of the two alternatives (if I was correct about either) you were referring to. One alternative was doubting whether the tint is real, the other was doubting whether, as a result of the introduced purple tint, the WB correction was accurate?
Ðiliff«»(Talk)18:11, 18 December 2012 (UTC)reply
Ah, I apologize. I believe the WB correction has gone beyond what the lighting and exposure of the shot would have allowed, and that the purple is evidence of this. However, I think the image is probably slightly underexposed, and thus I'm not sure a perfect white balance, while still bringing out the detail lost in the dark areas of the original, is possible.
Chick Bowen01:13, 19 December 2012 (UTC)reply
Support Alt 2. Overall a good photograph, the WB in the original is way off and I didn't realize that people mummified as fast as shown in Alt 1 but Alt 2 has a good balance. Cat-fivetc ----
13:17, 21 December 2012 (UTC)reply