From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

France radar

France.

From NASA. If only we had physical maps like this for all of the countries. Used on Geography of France. - grendel| khan 09:17, 2004 Dec 22 (UTC)

  • Nominate and support. - grendel| khan 09:17, 2004 Dec 22 (UTC)
  • Comment. I have uploaded the full version to the commons.
  • Oppose. The drop shadow ruins it (it's uneven aswell). ed g2stalk 22:13, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
    • Shouldn't the drop shadow be uneven? If the Earth is round and the light is coming from a point source, you wouldn't necessarily have the exact same amount of shadow along edges with the same slopes. -- brian0918 ™ 19:05, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
      • Sure, if the shadow was supposed to be representing some sort of realistic effect. A nice even shadow around the edge to give slight emphasis to the borders would've been much neater. ed g2stalk 01:24, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Support. Isn't France deliberately cut out from surrounding countries, and that is what is craeting the shadow?-- ZayZayEM 00:56, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Support. Shadow isn't too obtrusive. -- Elijah 05:53, 2004 Dec 24 (UTC)
  • Neutral. I think the detail in the data is excellent and I like the fact that it is France that is the subject. So this should have a place in featured pictures, but I am also uncomfortably with the floating territory/drop shadow treatment (for example its not clear that the Channel Islands aren't in France). Unfortunately I couldn't find an original source image which could be used for an alternative boundary highlight (such as desaturating and tinting the neighbouring countries). -- Solipsist 11:09, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Support. Neutrality talk 00:15, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Enochlau 03:33, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Janderk 17:14, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Support. I actually like the drop shadow... ugen64 03:49, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Oppose; would be support if, indeed, like Solipsist suggested, we could use the original with the other countries faded. James F. (talk) 08:33, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Rescue me! Boring image - where is the excitement? JediMaster16 03:56, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Support (JediMaster, how exciting do you expect a topographic map of France to be?) Shows the topography of France clearly, it's informative and pleasing to look at - Adrian Pingstone 11:11, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose Have to say I agree with JediMaster16: it's clearly an illustrative image, but hardly gripping or exciting. Featured pictures should surely make you think 'wow' when you see them, and I can't see how anyone could find this a particularly thrilling image. Worldtraveller 19:11, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • NOT promoted, +6/-6 -- Bevo 16:16, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

France radar

France.

From NASA. If only we had physical maps like this for all of the countries. Used on Geography of France. - grendel| khan 09:17, 2004 Dec 22 (UTC)

  • Nominate and support. - grendel| khan 09:17, 2004 Dec 22 (UTC)
  • Comment. I have uploaded the full version to the commons.
  • Oppose. The drop shadow ruins it (it's uneven aswell). ed g2stalk 22:13, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
    • Shouldn't the drop shadow be uneven? If the Earth is round and the light is coming from a point source, you wouldn't necessarily have the exact same amount of shadow along edges with the same slopes. -- brian0918 ™ 19:05, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
      • Sure, if the shadow was supposed to be representing some sort of realistic effect. A nice even shadow around the edge to give slight emphasis to the borders would've been much neater. ed g2stalk 01:24, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Support. Isn't France deliberately cut out from surrounding countries, and that is what is craeting the shadow?-- ZayZayEM 00:56, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Support. Shadow isn't too obtrusive. -- Elijah 05:53, 2004 Dec 24 (UTC)
  • Neutral. I think the detail in the data is excellent and I like the fact that it is France that is the subject. So this should have a place in featured pictures, but I am also uncomfortably with the floating territory/drop shadow treatment (for example its not clear that the Channel Islands aren't in France). Unfortunately I couldn't find an original source image which could be used for an alternative boundary highlight (such as desaturating and tinting the neighbouring countries). -- Solipsist 11:09, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Support. Neutrality talk 00:15, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Enochlau 03:33, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Janderk 17:14, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Support. I actually like the drop shadow... ugen64 03:49, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Oppose; would be support if, indeed, like Solipsist suggested, we could use the original with the other countries faded. James F. (talk) 08:33, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Rescue me! Boring image - where is the excitement? JediMaster16 03:56, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Support (JediMaster, how exciting do you expect a topographic map of France to be?) Shows the topography of France clearly, it's informative and pleasing to look at - Adrian Pingstone 11:11, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose Have to say I agree with JediMaster16: it's clearly an illustrative image, but hardly gripping or exciting. Featured pictures should surely make you think 'wow' when you see them, and I can't see how anyone could find this a particularly thrilling image. Worldtraveller 19:11, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • NOT promoted, +6/-6 -- Bevo 16:16, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)



Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook