Admittedly there is an
existing FP of this waterfall, but it was mentioned that this current nominated image has better EV due to the more complete view offered by it. The two images are very different in scope and I think there is probably grounds for two FPs on that basis, but I'll let you decide.
Support Fine for two FP's in my view when they are both this good...
Gazhiley (
talk) 15:20, 10 February 2010 (UTC)reply
Support: striking photo and good detail. The other FP is very nice, but this one gives a good impression of the scale of the waterfall (there are people visible at the very bottom) and shows the entire cascade.
NotFromUtrecht (
talk) 17:46, 10 February 2010 (UTC)reply
Promoted File:Upper Wentworth Falls, NSW, Australia 2 - Nov 2008.jpg —
Maedin\talk 17:58, 17 February 2010 (UTC)reply
Admittedly there is an
existing FP of this waterfall, but it was mentioned that this current nominated image has better EV due to the more complete view offered by it. The two images are very different in scope and I think there is probably grounds for two FPs on that basis, but I'll let you decide.
Support Fine for two FP's in my view when they are both this good...
Gazhiley (
talk) 15:20, 10 February 2010 (UTC)reply
Support: striking photo and good detail. The other FP is very nice, but this one gives a good impression of the scale of the waterfall (there are people visible at the very bottom) and shows the entire cascade.
NotFromUtrecht (
talk) 17:46, 10 February 2010 (UTC)reply
Promoted File:Upper Wentworth Falls, NSW, Australia 2 - Nov 2008.jpg —
Maedin\talk 17:58, 17 February 2010 (UTC)reply